Information icon.svg Consider taking the RationalWiki Community Survey 2017 or see the results.

Conservapedia:Atheism/torefute

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Wigocp.svg This Conservapedia-related article is of largely historical interest, and not necessarily the focus of RationalWiki today.
Conservapedia was a major focal point in the early history of RationalWiki, but long ago ceased coming up with new ways to appall and amuse.
Our energies are now spent debunking other, fresher examples of religious fundamentalism and creationist claims.
For RationalWiki's less ancient content, try the cover story articles or a random article.
Conservlogo late april.png
Conservapedia
Introduction
Newcomer's Guide
What is going on?
Commentary
Best of Conservapedia
Blatant plagiarism
Differences with Wikipedia
Hijacked articles
"SDG"
"TZB"
"Fab Five"
Sysops
Timeline
CP in the media
In-depth analysis
Active users
Illustrated guide
Fun
Article Matrix
Greatest Insights
Parthian Shots

More about CP

CP's version as of 9:45, 3 September 2007


Atheism, as defined by the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy and the Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, is the denial of the existence of any God or gods.[1][2]

Attempts to Dilute the Definition of Atheism[edit]

Since 1979 proponents of atheism have often been attempting to dilute the definition of atheism to mean a mere lack of belief there is a God or gods.[3] One of the reasons why some proponents of atheism have been attempting to dilute the definition of the term atheism is to shift the burden of proof regarding the existence of God. [3]

In the article, Is Atheism Presumptuous?, atheist Jeffery Jay Lowder, a founder of Internet Infidels, states that "I agree [with Copan] that anyone who claims, "God does not exist," must shoulder a burden of proof just as much as anyone who claims, "God exists." [3] In short, the attempt to redefine atheism is a merely an attempt to make no assertions so no facts need be offered.[3] The attempt to redefine atheism, however, is not in accordance with the standard definitions of atheism that encyclopedias of philosophy employ which is that atheism is a denial of the existence of God or gods.[4][5][3]

Types of Atheism Further Explained[edit]

There different types of atheism, based on different answers to the following questions:

  • In what God or gods deny and/or disbelieve?
  • Why does the atheist deny and/or disbelieve?
  • How does the atheist's denial and/or disbelief manifest itself?

Which God or gods?[edit]

Since atheism is denial or disbelief in a God or gods, it is important first to identify in which god the atheist denies or disbelieves. In ancient times, for example, Christians were accused of being atheists because of their disbelief of the pagan gods, even though they believed in the Christian God.[6] Socrates was also accused of Atheism, although references to God run throughout his recorded statements.[7] Also, Albert Einstein and Baruch Spinoza professed belief in "God," but they defined "God" as the cosmos as a whole, and without personality. Therefore, one can be considered an atheist with respect to one god, but a theist with respect to another, and it is important to understand first in what God the atheist denies or claims to disbelieve.

Why does the atheist state they disbelieve?[edit]

Atheists claim there are two main reasons for their denial of the existence of God and/or disbelief in God: the conviction that there is positive evidence or argument that God does not exist (Strong atheism), and their claim that theists bear the burden of proof to show that God exists, that they have failed to do so, and that belief is therefore unwarranted (Weak atheism).

Manifestations[edit]

There are two ways that atheism manifests itself:

  • Theoretical atheism: atheism of the mind -- that is, believing that God does not exist.
  • Practical atheism: atheism of the life - that is, living as though God does not exist. [8]

Biblical Statements Regarding Atheism[edit]

The writers of the Bible considered the existence of God to be self-evident and Moses simply wrote: "In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth." (Genesis 1:1). [9]

Accordingly, the psalmist David wrote the following:

"The fool has said in his heart, 'There is no God.' They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good." - Psalms 14:1

The psalmist David also stated that "The heavens declare the glory of God..." - Psalms 19:1

The Apostle Paul wrote to the Romans that the creation testifies to the existence of God when he wrote the following:

"For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who suppress the truth in unrighteousness, because what may be known of God is manifest in them, for God has shown it to them. For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even His eternal power and Godhead, so that they are without excuse,For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, [even] his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse..." - Romans 1:19-20 (NKJV)

Various Causal Factors of Atheism[edit]

A number of causes of atheism have been offered:

  • State churches: Rates of atheism are much higher in countries with a state sanctioned religion (such as many European countries), and lower in states without a sanctioned religion (such as the United States). Some argue this is because state churches become bloated, corrupt, and/or out of touch with the religious intuitions of the population, while churches independent of the state are leaner and more adaptable. It is important to distinguish "state-sanctioned churches," where participation is voluntary, from "state-mandated churches" (such as Saudi Arabia) with much lower atheism rates because publicly admitted atheism is punishable by death. [10]
  • Rebellion: Some argue that atheism stems from a deliberate choice to ignore the reality of God's existence[11]
  • Moral depravity: Some argue that moral depravity has been demonstrated in the atheist community through history and through various studies.[12][13][14][15] The Bible asserts that "The fool has said in his heart, 'There is no God.' They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good." (Psalms 14:1 (KJV)). The biblical fool is said to be lacking in sound judgement and the biblical fool is also associated with moral depravity. For example, the biblical book of Proverbs states: "A wise man is cautious and turns away from evil, But a fool is arrogant and careless. A quick-tempered man acts foolishly, And a man of evil devices is hated. The naive inherit foolishness, But the sensible are crowned with knowledge."(Proverbs 14:16-18 (NASB)). The book of Proverbs also has strong words regarding the depravity of biblical fools: "The desire accomplished is sweet to the soul: but [it is] abomination to fools to depart from evil." (Proverbs 13:9 (KJV)). Regarding the deceitfulness of fools Proverbs states: "The wisdom of the sensible is to understand his way, But the foolishness of fools is deceit." (Proverbs 14:8 (KJV)). Noted Bible commentator and clergyman Matthew Henry wrote regarding atheism: "A man that is endued with the powers of reason, by which he is capable of knowing, serving, glorifying, and enjoying his Maker, and yet lives without God in the world, is certainly the most despicable and the most miserable animal under the sun."[16] Others are of the opinion that theists are also capable of moral depravity, and indeed that all people are "totally depraved" by original sin.
  • Superficiality: Noted ex-atheist and psychologist Dr. Paul Vitz has stated that he had superficial reasons for becoming an atheist such as the desire to be accepted by his Stanford professors who were united in disbelief regarding God.[17]
  • Error: Some argue that atheism partly stems from a failure to fairly and judiciously consider the facts [18]
  • Poor relationship with father: Some argue that a troubled/non-existent relationship with a father may influence one towards becoming an atheist.[19] Dr. Paul Vitz wrote a book entitled Faith of the Fatherless in which he points out that after studying the lives of more than a dozen leading atheists he found that a large majority of them had a father who was present but weak, present but abusive, or absent.[20][21] Dr. Vitz also examined the lives of prominent theists who were contemporaneous to their atheist counterparts and from the same culture and in every instance these prominent theists had a good relationship with his father.[22] Dr. Vitz has also stated other common factors he observed in the famous atheists he profiled: they were all intelligent and arrogant.[23]
  • Negative experiences with Christians: "The single greatest cause of atheism in the world today is Christians, who acknowledge Jesus with their lips, then walk out the door, and deny Him by their lifestyle. That is what an unbelieving world simply finds unbelievable."[24]
  • Division in religion: According to Francis Bacon, atheism is cased by "divisions in religion, if they be many; for any one main division addeth zeal to both sides, but many divisions introduce atheism." [25]
  • Learned times, peace, and prosperity: Francis Bacon argued that atheism was caused by "Learned times, specially with peace and prosperity; for troubles and adversities do more bow men’s minds to religion."[26]

Tenuousness of Atheism in Prominent People Who Claimed to Atheist[edit]

The atheism of notable people who claimed to be atheists has had the characteristic of tenuousness in regards to maintaining thoughts in accordance with atheism. For example, Jean-Paul Sartre was one of the leading atheists of the 20th Century. Yet Jean-Paul Sartre made this candid confession:

As for me, I don’t see myself as so much dust that has appeared in the world but as a being that was expected, prefigured, called forth. In short, as a being that could, it seems, come only from a creator; and this idea of a creating hand that created me refers me back to God. Naturally this is not a clear, exact idea that I set in motion every time I think of myself. It contradicts many of my other ideas; but it is there, floating vaguely. And when I think of myself I often think rather in this way, for wont of being able to think otherwise.[27]

Charles Darwin wrote in his private notebooks that he was a materialist which is a type of atheist.[28][29] The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy states the following:

In 1885, the Duke of Argyll recounted a conversation he had had with Charles Darwin the year before Darwin's death: In the course of that conversation I said to Mr. Darwin, with reference to some of his own remarkable works on the Fertilisation of Orchids, and upon The Earthworms, and various other observations he made of the wonderful contrivances for certain purposes in nature—I said it was impossible to look at these without seeing that they were the effect and the expression of Mind. I shall never forget Mr. Darwin's answer. He looked at me very hard and said, “Well, that often comes over me with overwhelming force; but at other times,” and he shook his head vaguely, adding, “it seems to go away.”(Argyll 1885, 244] [30]

Denials That Atheists Exist[edit]

Some have asserted that atheists do not exist. In regards to a biblical statement on atheism Sir Francis Bacon stated in his essay Of Atheism the following regarding atheism: The Scripture saith, The fool hath said in his heart, there is no God; it is not said, The fool hath thought in his heart; so as he rather saith it, by rote to himself, as that he would have, than that he can thoroughly believe it, or be persuaded of it....It appeareth in nothing more, that atheism is rather in the lip, than in the heart of man.[31]}}

In addition, Christian philosophers and apologists Dr. Cornelius Van Til and Dr. Greg Bahnsen argued there are no atheists and that atheists are actively suppressing their belief and knowledge of God and enigmatically engage in self-deception.[32] The English poet Edward Young wrote in his famous work Night Thoughts that "By night, an atheist half-believes a God."[33]

Claims of the Conditionality and Nonconditionality of Atheism[edit]

Plato wrote that "Few men are so obstinate in their atheism, that a pressing danger will not compel them to the acknowledgement of a divine power."[34] Reverend William T. Cummings is famous for stating that "There are no atheists in foxholes."[35] Chaplain F.W. Lawson of the 302d Machine Gun Battalion, who was wounded twice in wartime, stated "I doubt if there is such a thing as an atheist. At least there isn't in a front line trench."[36]

Although news organization MSNBC featured a story in which atheist veterans claimed that there are atheists in foxholes,[37] as previously mentioned, Sir Francis Bacon wrote: "The Scripture saith, The fool hath said in his heart, there is no God; it is not said, The fool hath thought in his heart; so as he rather saith it, by rote to himself, as that he would have, than that he can thoroughly believe it, or be persuaded of it....It appeareth in nothing more, that atheism is rather in the lip, than in the heart of man.[38] In addition, the Bible states that "The wisdom of the prudent is to understand his way, But the folly of fools is deceit."(Proverbs 14:8). Also, there is the previously-mentioned theory of Christian philosophers and Christian apologists Cornelius Van Til and Dr. Greg Bahnsen who argued there are no atheists and that atheists are actively suppressing their belief and knowledge of God and enigmatically engage in self-deception.[39]

Atheism and Communism[edit]

Karl Marx said "Religion is the opium of the people," [40] and also wrote: "Communism begins from the outset (Owen) with atheism; but atheism is at first far from being communism; indeed, that atheism is still mostly an abstraction." [41]

Vladimir Lenin similarly wrote: "A Marxist must be a materialist, i. e., an enemy of religion, but a dialectical materialist, i. e., one who treats the struggle against religion not in an abstract way, not on the basis of remote, purely theoretical, never varying preaching, but in a concrete way, on the basis of the class struggle which is going on in practice and is educating the masses more and better than anything else could."[42]

Criticism[edit]

Atheism and the universal negative[edit]

Dr. D. James Kennedy wrote about the impossibility of proving the key plank of Atheism, the non-existence of God:

Atheism is what is called a "universal negative." One of the laws of logic is that you can't prove a universal negative....You would have to examine every part of the universe....

By the way, you would have to be very, very fast because, who knows, this God, these angels....may be very, very fast, and just after you get somewhere, they may have left for another part of the universe.

This means that you would have to be omnipresent. You would also have to know everything about every part of the universe, so you would be omniscient. Then, just at the point when you proved that there was no God, you would also have proven that you were one.[43]

Logician Mortimer Adler concurs with Dr. Kennedy that the standard definition of atheism which attempts to prove a universal negative in regards to God's existence is a self-defeating proposition and prominent atheists such as Gordon Stein and Carl Sagan have candidly stated that God's existence cannot be disproven.[44]

Atheism and Reasonable Argument[edit]

Theists often criticize atheism as being contrary to persuasive argument. Arguments for the existence of God include:

  • Teleological argument: The universe exhibits overwhelming evidence of deliberate, intelligent, purposeful design, which implies an intelligent designer;
  • Cosmological argument: Every event in our universe necessarily has a cause. However, it is impossible that there should be an unending chain of causes going back. Therefore, there necessarily must be a cause distinct from the universe as we know it which is capable of causing all things and is itself uncaused. Atheism denies that that First Cause is God.
  • Ontological argument: Since existence is inherent to the definition of God, it is impossible to conceive of God without conceiving of Him as existing;
  • Historical arguments for the existence of God: Arguments stemming from historical accounts and archaeological evidence;
  • Experiential arguments for the existence of God: Arguments based on personal experience and human intuition;

Atheism and Mass Murder[edit]

Christian apologist Gregory Koukl wrote that "the assertion is that religion has caused most of the killing and bloodshed in the world. There are people who make accusations and assertions that are empirically false. This is one of them."[45] Koukl details the number of people killed in various events involving theism and compares them to the much higher tens of millions of people killed under atheistic regimes.[45]

Koukl summarized by stating:

It is true that it's possible that religion can produce evil, and generally when we look closer at the detail it produces evil because the individual people are actually living in a rejection of the tenets of Christianity and a rejection of the God that they are supposed to be following. So it can produce it, but the historical fact is that outright rejection of God and institutionalizing of atheism actually does produce evil on incredible levels. We're talking about tens of millions of people as a result of the rejection of God.[45]

The theory of evolution played a prominent role in regards to communism.[46][47] Communists, in particular Stalinism, favored a version of Lamarckism called Lysenkoism[48]. Many geneticists were imprisoned and executed for their bourgeois science, and agricultural policies based on Lysenkoism that were adopted under Stalin and Mao caused famines and the death of millions[49].

Nobel Prize winner Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn was asked to account for the great tragedies that occurred under the brutal communist regime he and fellow citizens suffered under.

Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn offered the following explanation:

Over a half century ago, while I was still a child, I recall hearing a number of old people offer the following explanation for the great disasters that had befallen Russia: "Men have forgotten God; that's why all this has happened. Since then I have spend well-nigh 50 years working on the history of our revolution; in the process I have read hundreds of books, collected hundreds of personal testimonies, and have already contributed eight volumes of my own toward the effort of clearing away the rubble left by that upheaval. But if I were asked today to formulate as concisely as possible the main cause of the ruinous revolution that swallowed up some 60 million of our people, I could not put it more accurately than to repeat: "Men have forgotten God; that's why all this has happened." [50]

Atheists in America and Charity[edit]

Charitable giving by atheists and agnostics in America is significantly less than by theists, according to a study by the Barna Group:

The typical no-faith American donated just $200 in 2006, which is more than seven times less than the amount contributed by the prototypical active-faith adult ($1500). Even when church-based giving is subtracted from the equation, active-faith adults donated twice as many dollars last year as did atheists and agnostics. In fact, while just 7% of active-faith adults failed to contribute any personal funds in 2006, that compares with 22% among the no-faith adults.[51]


Arthur C. Brooks wrote:

The differences in charity between secular and religious people are dramatic. Religious people are 25 percentage points more likely than secularists to donate money (91 percent to 66 percent) and 23 points more likely to volunteer time (67 percent to 44 percent). And, consistent with the findings of other writers, these data show that practicing a religion is more important than the actual religion itself in predicting charitable behavior. For example, among those who attend worship services regularly, 92 percent of Protestants give charitably, compared with 91 percent of Catholics, 91 percent of Jews, and 89 percent from other religions.[52]

ABC News reported the following:

...the single biggest predictor of whether someone will be charitable is their religious participation.

Religious people are more likely to give to charity, and when they give, they give more money: four times as much. And Arthur Brooks told me that giving goes beyond their own religious organization:

"Actually, the truth is that they're giving to more than their churches," he says. "The religious Americans are more likely to give to every kind of cause and charity, including explicitly non-religious charities."[53]

Atheism and Immoral Views[edit]

The Barna Group also found that atheists/agnostics in America were more likely, than theists in America, to look upon the following behaviors as morally acceptable: illegal drug use; excessive drinking; sexual relationships outside of marriage; abortion; cohabitating with someone of opposite sex outside of marriage; obscene language; gambling; pornography and obscene sexual behavior; engaging in homosexuality/bisexuality. [54]

Atheism and Questions of Origins[edit]

Atheism provides no useful input in regards to origins. Creationist scientists state that the first law of thermodynamics and the second law of thermodynamics argue against an eternal universe or a universe created by natural processes and argue for a universe created by God.[55][56][57] A majority of the most prominent and vocal defenders of the evolutionary position which employs methodological naturalism since World War II have been atheists.[58][59] Creationist scientists also assert the theory of evolution is an inadequate explanation for the variety of life forms on earth.[60] In addition, the current naturalistic explanations for the origin of life are inadequate.

Atheism and the Existence of Evil[edit]

Atheists state that the existence of evil is a problem for theism which holds to a good and powerful God.[61] Theodicy is the branch of study in theology and philosophy that defends the goodness of God despite the existence of evil.[62] In traditional Christianity and Judaism the book of Job is used to explain the existence of evil.[63] In recent times Christian apologists often cite Alvin Plantinga's free will defense in regards to the existence of evil. [64][65] The work of St. Augustine is also cited in regards to theodicy. [66]

Atheism and the Foundation of Modern Science[edit]

The birth of modern science occured in Christianized Europe.[67] Sociologist Rodney Stark investigated the individuals who made the most significant scientific contributions between 1543 and 1680 A.D., the time of the Scientific Revolution. In Stark's list of 52 top scientific contributors,[68] only one (Edmund Halley) was a skeptic and another (Paracelsus) was a pantheist. The other 50 were Christians, 30 of whom could be characterized as being devout Christians.[68] Sir Francis Bacon, sometimes referred to as "the Father of Modern Science", wrote: "I had rather believe all the fables in the Legend, and the Talmud, and the Koran, than that this universal frame is without a mind."[69]

‎In False conflict: Christianity is not only compatible with Science--it created it Stark writes:

Recent historical research has debunked the idea of a "Dark Ages" after the "fall" of Rome. In fact, this was an era of profound and rapid technological progress, by the end of which Europe had surpassed the rest of the world. Moreover, the so-called "Scientific Revolution" of the sixteenth century was a result of developments begun by religious scholars starting in the eleventh century. In my own academic research I have asked why these religious scholastics were interested in science at all. Why did science develop in Europe at this time? Why did it not develop anywhere else? I find answers to those questions in unique features of Christian theology. Even in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, the leading scientific figures were overwhelmingly devout Christians who believed it their duty to comprehend God's handiwork. My studies show that the "Enlightenment" was conceived initially as a propaganda ploy by militant atheists attempting to claim credit for the rise of science. The falsehood that science required the defeat of religion was proclaimed by self-appointed cheerleaders like Voltaire, Diderot, and Gibbon, who themselves played no part in the scientific enterprise......[70]

Dr. Charles Thaxton similarly states:

P. E. Hodgson in reviewing Stanley Jaki's Science and Creation said: "Although we seldom recognize it, scientific research requires certain basic beliefs about the order and rationality of matter, and its accessibility to the human mind . . . they came to us in their full force through the Judeo-Christian belief in an omnipotent God, creator and sustainer of all things. In such a world view it becomes sensible to try and understand the world, and this is the fundamental reason science developed as it did in the Middle Ages in Christian Europe, culminating in the brilliant achievements of the seventeenth century."[71]

Ineffectiveness of Atheist Debaters[edit]

Doug Jesseph[edit]

In October of 1997, atheist Jeffrey Jay Lowder, a founder of Internet Infidels, stated that he believed that "the most impressive debater to date" was Doug Jesseph.[72] Yet Doug Jesseph claimed in a debate with William Lane Craig in 1996 that the origin of life had a detailed atheistic explanation(s).[73] In 1996, John Horgan wrote the following regarding what the highly respected origin of life researcher Stanley Miller believed to the case regarding naturalistic explanations of the origin of life: "Miller seemed unimpressed with any of the current proposals on the origin of life, referring to them as “nonsense” or “paper chemistry.”"[74] In addition, in 1996, John Horgan wrote the following in Scientific American: "The origin of life is a science writer's dream. It abounds with exotic scientists and exotic theories, which are never entirely abandoned or accepted, but merely go in and out of fashion."[75]

Gordon Stein[edit]

In 1985, Christian apologist Dr. Greg Bahnsen and prominent atheist Gordon Stein had a debate at the University of California, Irvine. John Frame wrote regarding the debate in which Dr. Bahnsen used the transcendental argument for the existence of God that "In the end, Stein walked and talked like a broken man."[76] The Greg Bahnsen-Gordon Stein debate was recorded and transcribed and was dubbed "The Great Debate".[77][78]

Greg Bahnsen and Michael Martin[edit]

Dr. Greg Bahnsen became known as the "man atheists fear most".[79] This is because Harvard-educated Dr. Michael Marti] was scheduled to debate Bahnsen but pulled out of the debate at the "eleventh hour". A press release at the time said that Dr. Martin offered ruses on why he pulled out and didn't want the scheduled debate recorded but the real reason was that "...Michael Martin is afraid that he will be publicly humiliated just as his friend and fellow atheist, Dr. Gordon Stein, was..."[80]

Martin later released his transcendental argument for the non-existence of God (TANG) in 1996 which was rebutted by Christian apologists.[81]

Creationists tend to win creation-evolution debates[edit]

As noted earlier, a majority of the most prominent and vocal defenders of the naturalistic evolutionary position since World War II have been atheists.[82][83] Robert Sloan, Director of Paleontology at the University of Minnesota, reluctantly admitted to a Wall Street Journal reporter that the "creationists tend to win" the public debates which focused on the creation vs. evolution controversy.[84][85] In August of 1979, Dr. Henry Morris reported in an Institute for Creation Research letter the following: “By now, practically every leading evolutionary scientist in this country has declined one or more invitations to a scientific debate on creation/evolution.”[85] Morris also said regarding the creation scientist Duane Gish (who had over 300 formal debates): “At least in our judgment and that of most in the audiences, he always wins.”[85] Generally speaking, leading evolutionists generally no longer debate creation scientists.[86]

Atheism and its Decline as a Theoretical Position[edit]

According to Munich theologian Wolfhart Pannenberg "Atheism as a theoretical position is in decline worldwide."[87] Oxford scholar Alister McGrath agrees and has stated that atheism's "future seems increasingly to lie in the private beliefs of individuals rather than in the great public domain it once regarded as its habitat."[88]

Atheism in Academia[edit]

There is a book by Richard H. Harvey, entitled "70 Years of Miracles." In it Harvey relates his experience in a Chemistry class at Allegheny College in Meadville, Pennsylvania in the 1920's.

According to Harvey, his professor Dr. Lee was a deist who for many years had spent time with each freshman class lecturing against prayer. After a couple of sessions discussing the power of natural laws and the lack of evidence that any god interferes with those laws, Lee would announce that he would drop a flask to the floor and challenged anyone to pray that the flask would remain whole.

Harvey then related that one year, a student finally found the courage to stand up and volunteer to pray. Lee dropped the flask and it rolled off his shoe to the floor without damage. The class cheered and Lee no longer delivered his annual lectures against prayer. fair use

Other Well Known Proponents of Atheism[edit]

Prominent atheists and atheist schools of thought include:

  • Carvaka school: an atheistic and materialistic offshoot of Hinduism in the 6th century b.c.
  • Samkhya school: an atheistic school of classical Indian philosophy, originating in the 6th century b.c.
  • Diagoras: Greek philosopher who denied the existence of the Greek pantheon
  • Epicurus: Greek philosopher espousing materialism, and stated that, even if the gods exist, they do not interact with humans and are therefore non-existent for all practical purposes;
  • Lucretius: Greek philosopher espousing materialism, and stated that man should not believe in the gods because their ideas about the gods and their fear of death made men unhappy;
  • Friedrich Nietzsche: Prominent 20th century atheist philosopher;
  • Mao Zedong: Chinese Communist leader;
  • Paul Kurtz: founder of the Council of Secular Humanism
  • Isaac Asimov
  • David Hume
  • Bertrand Russell
  • Ayn Rand
  • Richard Dawkins
  • Douglas Adams
  • Ernest Hemingway

Atheist population as a percentage of various countries' populations[edit]

Specific research on atheists conducted in 2006 suggests that the true proportion of atheists is 4% in the United States, 17% in Great Britain and 32% in France. In the United States, however, another 14% of the respondents identified themselves as agnostic indicating that 18% of the U.S. population do not ascribe to theistic views.[89]

American's view of atheists[edit]

Research in the American Sociological Review finds that among several groups listed, atheists are the group that Americans relate least to in terms of their vision of American society and are the group most likely to be mentioned as one that Americans would not want to have marry into their family. [90]

Position: This Group Does Not At All Agree with My Vision of American Society: I Would Disapprove if My Child Wanted to Marry a Member of This Group:
Atheist 39.6% 47.6%
Muslim 26.3% 33.5%
Homosexual 22.6% NA
Conservative Christian 13.5% 6.9%
Recent Immigrant 12.5% Not Asked
Hispanic 7.6% 18.5%
Jew 7.4% 11.8%
Asian American 7.0% 18.5%
African American 4.6% 27.2%
White American 2.2% 2.3%

External links[edit]

See Also[edit]

Notes[edit]

  1. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/atheism-agnosticism/
  2. http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/1998
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 http://www.thedivineconspiracy.org/athart3.htm
  4. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/atheism-agnosticism/
  5. http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/1998
  6. Athenagoras, A Plea for the Christians, 2d century a.d.[1]
  7. Plato, Apol., 26,c.
  8. Dr. Martin Luther King in his sermon A letter to American Christians spoke of "practical atheism".[2]
  9. http://www.answersingenesis.org/Home/Area/AnswersBook/existence1.asp
  10. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118434936941966055.html?mod=googlenews_wsj
  11. "For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who suppress the truth in unrighteousness, because what may be known of God is manifest in them, for God has shown it to them. For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even His eternal power and Godhead, so that they are without excuse,For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, [even] his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse..." —Romans 1:19-20
  12. http://www.str.org/site/News2?page=NewsArticle&id=5527
  13. http://www.barna.org/FlexPage.aspx?Page=BarnaUpdateNarrow&BarnaUpdateID=272
  14. http://abcnews.go.com/2020/Story?id=2682730&page=2
  15. http://www.barna.org/FlexPage.aspx?Page=BarnaUpdate&BarnaUpdateID=152
  16. http://www.ccel.org/ccel/henry/mhc1.ii.html
  17. http://www.columbia.edu/cu/augustine/arch/vitz.txt
  18. "A young man who wishes to remain a sound Atheist cannot be too careful of his reading. There are traps everywhere--'Bibles laid open, millions of surprises,' as Herbert says, 'fine nets and stratagems.' God is, if I may say it, very unscrupulous." -- C.S. Lewis, Surprised by Joy.
  19. http://www.leaderu.com/truth/1truth12.html
  20. Vitz, Paul, The Psychology of Atheism, September 24, 1997 (lecture notes taken by an audience member).
  21. Anders, Kerby, Atheists and Their Fathers (Probe Ministries)
  22. http://www.columbia.edu/cu/augustine/arch/vitz.txt
  23. http://www.columbia.edu/cu/augustine/arch/vitz.txt
  24. Brennan Manning
  25. http://www.philosophyofreligion.info/ofatheism.html
  26. http://www.philosophyofreligion.info/ofatheism.html
  27. http://www.johnankerberg.org/Articles/apologetics/AP0702W4.htm
  28. http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/1877
  29. American Scientist May 1977:323
  30. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/teleological-arguments/notes.html
  31. http://www.authorama.com/essays-of-francis-bacon-17.html
  32. http://www.cmfnow.com/articles/PA191.htm
  33. http://www.bartleby.com/100/224.html
  34. http://listserv.linguistlist.org/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind0609D&L=ads-l&P=15696
  35. http://listserv.linguistlist.org/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind0609D&L=ads-l&P=15696
  36. http://listserv.linguistlist.org/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind0609D&L=ads-l&P=15696
  37. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14322117/
  38. http://www.authorama.com/essays-of-francis-bacon-17.html
  39. http://www.cmfnow.com/articles/PA191.htm
  40. http://www3.baylor.edu/~Scott_Moore/texts/Marx_Opium.html
  41. http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1844/manuscripts/comm.htm
  42. http://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1909/may/13.htm
  43. Kennedy, James D., A Universal Negative
  44. Samples, Kenneth R., Putting The Atheist on The Defensive Christian Research Journal, Fall 1991 & Winter 1992, page 7
  45. 45.0 45.1 45.2 Koukl, Gregory, The Real Murderers: Atheism or Christianity?, 1994
  46. http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/3054/
  47. http://www.icr.org/index.php?module=articles&action=view&ID=276
  48. http://www.bookrags.com/research/lysenkoism-wog/
  49. http://www.bookrags.com/research/lysenkoism-wog/
  50. http://www.icr.org/index.php?module=articles&action=view&ID=276
  51. Atheists and Agnostics Take Aim at Christians The Barna Update, 2007.
  52. Brooks, Arthur C., faith and charitable giving Policy Review, Oct-Dec 2003, p.2.
  53. Stossel, John and Kendall, Kristina Who Gives and Who Doesn't? ABC News, November 28, 2006
  54. http://www.barna.org/FlexPage.aspx?Page=BarnaUpdate&BarnaUpdateID=152
  55. http://godevidences.net/space/lawsofscience.php
  56. http://www.apologeticspress.org/articles/2329
  57. http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/AstroPhysicalSciences14.html
  58. Dr. Don Batten, A Who’s Who of evolutionists Creation 20(1):32 December 1997.
  59. Jonathan Sarfati, Ph.D.,F.M., Refuting Evolution, Chapter 1, Facts and Bias
  60. http://www.icr.org/home/resources/resources_tracts_scientificcaseagainstevolution/
  61. http://www.leaderu.com/orgs/probe/docs/evil.html
  62. http://encarta.msn.com/dictionary_1861719540/theodicy.html
  63. http://apologetics.com/default.jsp?bodycontent=/articles/doctrinal_apologetics/bowman-job.html
  64. http://www.xenos.org/essays/evilpo.htm
  65. http://www3.baylor.edu/~Scott_Moore/handouts/free_will_defense.html
  66. http://www.str.org/site/News2?page=NewsArticle&id=5124
  67. http://www.ldolphin.org/bumbulis/#anchor5343749
  68. 68.0 68.1 Williams, Alex,The biblical origins of science, Journal of Creation 18(2):49–52, August 2004.
  69. Bacon, Francis, Of Atheism
  70. http://goliath.ecnext.com/coms2/gi_0199-3274629/False-conflict-Christianity-is-not.html
  71. http://www.leaderu.com/truth/1truth17.html
  72. http://www.infidels.org/infidels/newsletter/1997/october.html
  73. http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/doug_jesseph/jesseph-craig/jesseph1.html
  74. http://www.trueorigin.org/abio.asp
  75. http://members.iinet.net.au/~sejones/orignl01.html#orgnflfmjrprblmschcknndgg
  76. http://www.frame-poythress.org/frame_articles/Bahnsen.htm
  77. http://prosapologian.wordpress.com/2007/08/15/great-debates/
  78. http://www.bellevuechristian.org/faculty/dribera/htdocs/PDFs/Apol_Bahnsen_Stein_Debate_Transcript.pdf
  79. http://mywebpages.comcast.net/webpages54/ap/biobahn.html
  80. Anon., Press Release
  81. http://www.reformed.org/apologetics/index.html?mainframe=/apologetics/martin_TAG.html
  82. Don Batten, A Who’s Who of evolutionists Creation 20(1):32, December 1997.
  83. Jonathan Sarfati, Refuting Evolution, Chapter 1, Facts and Bias
  84. Ankerberg, John, and Weldon, John, Truth in Advertising: Damaging the Cause of Science
  85. 85.0 85.1 85.2 Fraser, Bill,Who wins the Debates?
  86. http://www.icr.org/article/811/
  87. http://www.worldtribune.com/worldtribune/05/breaking2453432.91875.html
  88. http://www.worldtribune.com/worldtribune/05/breaking2453432.91875.html
  89. In addition, 6% declined to say; and 3% indicated they were unsure of their beliefs.
  90. Edgell, Gerteis & Hartmann 2006