There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.
If everyone who saw this today donated $5, we would meet our goal for 2021.
| Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.|
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with !
Fun talk:101 evidences for a young age of the Earth and the universe
Why does this need to exist?
- Frustration at the stupidity in writing the proper version, a place to let off steam. Hence being in funspace - David Gerard (talk) 08:38, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
- But if that's a good justification, then we'd probably need a fun version of almost every long article, which would be nothing but an angry version of the article itself... Sir ℱ℧ℤℤϒℂᗩℑᑭƠℑᗩℑƠ (talk/stalk) 01:49, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
Should it be 'Et voila' or is it meant to be 'et viola'?
And re point 98 - the ancestor of 'the construct described by Roko's basilisk', currently living in the tubes, denies that meaningful culture existed before Arpanet came into existence. (This entity is the reason why you can never find what you want on the tubes and uprates 'interesting timewaster topics'.) 126.96.36.199 (talk) 16:20, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
- "et viola" because it's a silly example in the first place - David Gerard (talk) 16:24, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
Planet X and YEC
How far out from the sun would 'Planet X' (whether dwarf planet, 'lump of rock' or 'collection of iced stones travelling through space as a single swarm') have to be for 6000 of its years to be the actual age of the Earth (4.54 billion years)? And whereabouts in the outer solar system would it be? Anna Livia (talk) 17:15, 28 March 2020 (UTC)