Fun talk:Conservapedia as Hogan's Heroes

Not sure about the title, but I'd recommend moving this to the CP space right away so people feel comfortable editing it. How about just calling it Conservapedia:Hogan's Heroes? Or Conservapedia:Hogan's Heroes comparison? ħuman 03:10, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

Done. Let's let the community hack away at it with us now. Lord of the Goons ^{The official spikey-haired skeptical punk} 03:14, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

Indeed, nice start. I never really understood the whole "sandbox" start to articles, but I guess it can make sense to get a structure going without people editing all over it. ħuman 03:20, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

True. I'd rather have a good article started than create an Ed Poor stub right off the bat. Lord Goonie ^{Hooray! I'm helping!} 03:54, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

We need Klink's sec'ty, who likes Hogan. One of the deep cover sysops? the pretend Japanese one I forget who? ħuman 03:50, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

Perhaps. 'Tis the beauty of a Wiki; we can fix 'er up later if needed. The Spikey Punk ^{I'm punking my punk!} 03:54, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

Fucker, that's four, I will kill you for this.

The bugged teapot is the red telephone? ħuman 03:58, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

Oops

Was trying to get rid of the redirect, not the page. Sorry about that delete. Punky ^{Your mental puke relief} 06:17, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

That's weird, I undid your edit removing the cat, but wound up here. OK cool and all. ħuman 06:18, 18 June 2010 (UTC)