| There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. If everyone seeing this today donates $5, we will meet our goal for 2019. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with |
RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Premium rate telephone number
From RationalWiki
Contents
Premium rate telephone number | Result: Deleted[edit]
Delete[edit]
- There is nothing missional in this article at all. that it is occasionally used by fake psychics etc means nothing - they also advertise in gossip rags (i'm told) but we don't cover those. Bicyclewheel
17:57, 13 July 2016 (UTC) - Might as well have an article on paper, naming people you people dislike who use it. Conscience (talk) 18:47, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
- Same as BW. oʇɐʇoԀʇɐϽʎzznℲ (talk/stalk) 22:11, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
- The reasons for deleting this have already been very eloquently stated. I can't say it any better.Spud (talk) 13:45, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
- Can't find much missionality in this. The fact that scammers use it doesn't make it relevant.--JorisEnter (talk) 12:01, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
Keep[edit]
- Rewrite it into an article about scam artists and woo peddlers using this stuff.--The (((Kigel))) (talk) (mail) 18:11, 13 July 2016 (UTC) 18:11, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
- They're still only *using* it. The phone line itself isn't the woo, it's only incidental to the woo. It's like having an article about books because David Icke writes books. Bicyclewheel
18:14, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
- Not exactly books but still ikanreed You probably didn't deserve that 22:21, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
- They're still only *using* it. The phone line itself isn't the woo, it's only incidental to the woo. It's like having an article about books because David Icke writes books. Bicyclewheel
- Faunas (talk) 19:43, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
Merge/redirect[edit]
Goat[edit]
- There could be an article, but this isn't it - David Gerard (talk) 18:59, 13 July 2016 (UTC)