RationalWiki's 2019 Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

If everyone who saw this today donated $5, we would meet our goal for 2019.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!

Donations so far: $2900Goal: $6000

RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Sky sounds

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Strange Noises in the Sky | Result: Keep[edit]

Sky sounds (edit|talk|history|protect|delete|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Keep[edit]

  1. A fairly well known piece of woo: Hufffpo, Sharon Hill, and of course the "Science has yet to identify the cause!" sensationalism of the Daily Mail. Maybe rename the article Sky noises or something. Leuders (talk) 16:00, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
    Moved it to Sky sounds. And fucked up the AfD template link in the process. Leuders (talk) 18:06, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
  2. Keep - vastly improved, this is now worth keeping - David Gerard (talk) 07:06, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
  3. Needs more citations & examples, but no reason to delete. €₳$£ΘĪÐWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 07:20, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
  4. Keep it. The article is way better than when it first started.--TemplarJLS (talk) 08:42, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

Delete[edit]

  1. This is just shit. Spud (talk) 09:22, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
  2. There's potential for something on silly explanations for unexplained noises, but probably only as passing mentions in larger articles. SophieWilderModerator 10:20, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

#There's a possible article, but this isn't it and it wouldn't be at this title - David Gerard (talk) 10:31, 8 September 2014 (UTC) Vastly improved, changing to keep - David Gerard (talk) 07:06, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

  1. Needs crazy amounts of extra brewing. Zero (talk - contributions) 13:45, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
  2. Not seeing why this article as it is is needed--Miekal 18:09, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
I could have sworn I saw the subject written up by a transphobic MRA anti-GMO fundamentalist Christian on Conservapedia... Leuders (talk) 19:14, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
I said as is. My statement is bascialy the same as David's--Miekal 19:15, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Goat[edit]