RationalWiki talk:Vlogroll/Controversial secularists

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Sarcastic[edit]

ΆI think the sarcastic voice is not appropriate for a sincere wiki. The article would be fine without it.— Unsigned, by: 194 24 1384 / talk / contribs

What makes you think this is a sincere wiki? Snark is what we do. Spud (talk) 10:23, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Looking at this page, it appears that this wiki is more aptly named "OpinionWiki." There isn't much rationality here, just the aggressive unloading of previously held opinions. NSeven (talk) 01:53, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

Jaclyn Glenn[edit]

About Jaclyn Glenn, her recent videos does have a pro-feminist tone to them, nonetheless her videos critical of feminism could be her opinion of radical feminism, or she is strictly neutral. About her Elliot Rodger video, to be fair, she did say that misogyny is not the only factor in the shooting, something which I agree, an incident like that must have a motive (misogyny) a triggering factor (mental illness) and a method or means(access to weapons, lack of gun control). In my opinion she might not be a feminist per se, but a humanist, she does not see misogyny as a gender issue but a human issue. but she is quite controversial. Just Sayin'. . .64.237.228.20 (talk) 20:47, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

What a bunch of bullies some of you are[edit]

I stumbled on this page by accident. Really? This is petty. This belongs in high school. You're making a list of anyone who has even criticized feminism? Is there no one left on this wiki who maintains even a slim sense of rationality? Enough to see how over the top of and insane the extremists on here really have become?

The Bible Reloaded?[edit]

Full disclosure here: I agree with a lot of what some of these guys say, though not necessarily all of it, and am generally more open to people who identify as feminists than as MRAs. But TBR has associated with people on both sides of the Gamergate issue, and proudly so. In fact, a casual stroll through the comments section of their videos will reveal that their (relatively few) critics are usually angry at their association with prominent Youtube feminists. The entry on here gives the opposite impression. I won't comment on some of the other entries since my knowledge of the people isn't comprehensive enough, but after this entry I have to seriously question if all of the allegations made are true/in context. — Unsigned, by: 209.173.173.16 / talk / contribs