User contributions
For 192.76.8.65 talk block log suppressed user contributions logs edit filter log vandal log
- 11:21, 2 September 2018 diff hist +353 Talk:LessWrong
- 18:12, 25 August 2018 diff hist +839 Talk:LessWrong →EA orgs praising AI pseudoscience charity. Is it useful?
- 19:39, 24 August 2018 diff hist +701 Talk:LessWrong →EA orgs praising AI pseudoscience charity. Is it useful?
- 19:24, 24 August 2018 diff hist +1,461 Talk:LessWrong →EA orgs praising AI pseudoscience charity. Is it useful?
- 19:07, 24 August 2018 diff hist -273 LessWrong revision was not true according to the 2017 EA survey the percentage of people comming into EA from Lesswrong has dropped to 15% and lesswrong is not longer in the top 5 of how people learn about EA
- 21:24, 21 August 2018 diff hist -44 Scott Alexander →Existential risks: removed a line that most people at MIRI are not AI researchers. Most of them have PhD in relevant fields or work experience at large tech companies that work on AI which qualifies them to do AI research.
- 20:54, 21 August 2018 diff hist +696 Talk:LessWrong →EA orgs praising AI pseudoscience charity. Is it useful?
- 20:35, 21 August 2018 diff hist +560 LessWrong The current version of this website presents an outdated view of effective altruism evaluators on miri, If you undo the update you purposefully create a false image. That is not rational that is bashing an organisation you dont like
- 17:50, 21 August 2018 diff hist +560 LessWrong It does not make sense to have an old negative evaluation by and EA organisation on this site but not allow users to add newer positive evaluations by other EA organisations. There should be either both or none.
- 17:29, 21 August 2018 diff hist -7 LessWrong →Finances
- 17:28, 21 August 2018 diff hist +567 LessWrong →Finances