| There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. If everyone seeing this today donates $5, we will meet our goal for 2019. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with |
Talk:Earth hour
From RationalWiki
Can you get the source and post it here? Thx. The EmperorKneel before Zod! 21:44, 7 April 2009 (EDT)
This thing doesn't work properly in Chrome.I see it got fixed. Ŵêâŝêîôîď
Methinks it is a Weasel 23:19, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
- Yeah, I changed my mind about what I wanted to do once I got to common.css. My original plan was to enlarge the link itself to 100% width and height and remove the underline on mouseover (the previous version broke in firefox because of the line-height, which was necessary to hide the underline), but then I just went with the simpler and less disruptive solution. -- Nx / talk 23:24, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
- Btw, is it confusing to have "lights off!" link to the article? Because clicking the link does the opposite, it turns on the lights, but on the other hand "lights off!" is like a motto or something. -- Nx / talk 23:28, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, it is. (It's a confusing page.) OTOH, it's the only feature on the page, so making it a link (and making it obviously clickable) is fine - David Gerard (talk) 23:31, 4 June 2010 (UTC)`
- That is an art, thanks for the fix. ĴαʊΆʃÇä₰ yes, JAVASCAP 01:19, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
- I have to say that it is a pretty cool idea. And while yes, the "Lights off!" thing is confusing, it takes anyone with more than 7 minutes of experience on the internet to figure it out.
moral 02:53, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
- One problem, you can't see the diffs and previous. Not that it matters, this isn't a content article. However, it is worth mentioning in case anyone wants to try this trick again elsewhere.
moral 02:56, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
- One problem, you can't see the diffs and previous. Not that it matters, this isn't a content article. However, it is worth mentioning in case anyone wants to try this trick again elsewhere.
- I have to say that it is a pretty cool idea. And while yes, the "Lights off!" thing is confusing, it takes anyone with more than 7 minutes of experience on the internet to figure it out.
- That is an art, thanks for the fix. ĴαʊΆʃÇä₰ yes, JAVASCAP 01:19, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, it is. (It's a confusing page.) OTOH, it's the only feature on the page, so making it a link (and making it obviously clickable) is fine - David Gerard (talk) 23:31, 4 June 2010 (UTC)`
- Btw, is it confusing to have "lights off!" link to the article? Because clicking the link does the opposite, it turns on the lights, but on the other hand "lights off!" is like a motto or something. -- Nx / talk 23:28, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
- Yeah, I changed my mind about what I wanted to do once I got to common.css. My original plan was to enlarge the link itself to 100% width and height and remove the underline on mouseover (the previous version broke in firefox because of the line-height, which was necessary to hide the underline), but then I just went with the simpler and less disruptive solution. -- Nx / talk 23:24, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
I notice that YouTube has stolen our joke.
moral 22:52, 25 March 2011 (UTC)