| There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. If everyone who saw this today donated $5, we would meet our goal for 2019. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with |
Talk:Krishna
The proponents going down Oxford Street do 'rabbit on.' 212.85.6.26 (talk) 16:23, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
backward[edit]
There is something very backward about this. If "hare krishna" is like saying "ave maria", then shouldn't the article be Krishna? the Hare part being a subset?— Unsigned, by: WaitingforGodot / talk / contribs
- I thought about the same thing, but I do not really get it. All I can do is describe a bit about Krishna's character, but I am not sure if this should just be called Krishna and leave the "hare" out. Feredir28 (talk) 20:51, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
- Flip the topics, make karishna first, hare second, and then relocate. at least that's what i'd do.
GodotThe Peyote God awaits 20:53, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
- Flip the topics, make karishna first, hare second, and then relocate. at least that's what i'd do.