| There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. If everyone seeing this today donates $5, we will meet our goal for 2019. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with |
Talk:Hare Krishna creationism
Contents
Theosophy[edit]
I understand that Theosophists believe in a form of Hindu creationism, should a section be added about this? Or a separate article? DinoCrisis (talk) 01:32, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
Krishna[edit]
This is pretty much entirely the Hare Krishna view, which is like taking Christian creationism and attributing it to Judaism - David Gerard (talk) 18:02, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
- As such, I've moved it. I realise they call their version "Hindu creationism", but it leads to confusion like the above comment - David Gerard (talk) 20:52, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Vedanta is anti-science[edit]
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/19420889.2015.1123356 FuzzyCatPotato of the Nefarious Homotopys (talk/stalk) 23:54, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
No, wait, Vendanta (sic) is actually pro-science, and empiricism is dumb[edit]
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/19420889.2016.1183855 Sir ℱ℧ℤℤϒℂᗩℑᑭƠℑᗩℑƠ (talk/stalk) 15:38, 24 May 2016 (UTC)