Talk:Kim Jong Un

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Icon sociology.svg This article contains information about one or more living persons.

Articles about living people must be handled carefully, because they are more open to legal threats.
Reference any contentious allegations solidly; unreferenced allegations should be removed.
If legal threats are raised on this page, please direct the potential litigant to RationalWiki:Legal FAQ; do not interact with them.

"With that being said, there are reports that his ascension to power has triggered infighting inside the North Korean Army;[4] this has culminated in the public execution of Jang Song Taek, his Number Two and uncle in late 2013, along with Jang's wife and children by being fed to wild dogs in an interesting subversion of North Korean cuisine."

Too far? --Let Them Eat Cake (talk) 23:53, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

Summit With Trump[edit]

Should his summit with Trump be mentioned on this page or on Trump's page or both? 68.0.189.224 (talk) 05:01, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

It should be mentioned, but since it shows Trump in a positive light I suspect it won't be.--RWRW (talk) 11:00, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
Mein Gott! If you think that shows tRump in a 'positive light' then you are truly deluded. Godot (talk) 14:26, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
Yes, I do consider having the biggest diplomatic breakthrough in 70 years a 'positive light'. Also congratulations! I seems opposing me gained you the rank of Sysop! --RWRW (talk) 17:56, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
A) Quit throwing a tantrum over not getting more rights, it's not the end of the world and doing so makes you look like a twatwaffle. B) Trump got a pinkie promise from Kim that most experts agree isn't worth shit. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 18:00, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
It wasn't a tantrum, it was a fact. And like I said, it was more than any president got including Obama. --RWRW (talk) 18:26, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
Bringing up user rights out of the blue? Yeah, that's you continuing your little shitfit, which let's be honest is only hurting your case. Meanwhile Obama got Iran to sign a contract more or less giving up the entirety of their nuclear capabilities, complete with international monitoring and heavy backlash should they step out of line. Trump in turn called this weak, dumped it (which was just plain stupid) and said he'd get better with North Korea but so far has squat to show for his bluster. An apt comparison would be a man who brags about his sex life but turns out to not only have erectile dysfunction but also premature ejaculation. Trump isn't going to outdo anyone on Foreign affairs and Diplomacy, and everyone bloody well knows it except for his ever adoring fanclub with their heads up their asses. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 18:35, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
Let's be honest, I've made many productive edits yet you (and your friends) opposed me out of dislike and spite. And with the trump-Kim summit, you and your band of lefties will do anything to downsize Trump's achievement, even though you know ol' Hillary would have never have achieved such a thing. --RWRW (talk) 18:54, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
Hillary isn't president, Trump is, Trump talked big and has yet to back it up with actions. In addition, "what about Hillary" in response to Trump's failings is quite simply dodging the issue. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 19:01, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
I must say, that was a very skilful deflection of my comment on your (and others) bias action in depriving me of Sysopship! And yes, Trump talked big, and he is delivering things that no other president has. Quit crying your liberal tears and admit that Trump has done much better than you originally thought.--RWRW (talk) 20:13, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
@RWRW Told you so. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 12:10, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia free image[edit]

Wikipedia now has a free image of Un Kim. Just saying. 108.26.217.72 (talk) 18:01, 16 September 2018 (UTC)