RationalWiki's 2019 Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

If everyone seeing this today donates $5, we will meet our goal for 2019.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!

Donations so far: $2900Goal: $6000

Talk:Plutonium

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Does RW really need another poorly written off-mission stub? RationalWiki is not an encyclopedia.--ZooGuard (talk) 07:29, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

No, it doesn't. The only valid reason for this article would be if it was connected with woo or pseudoscience. I seem to recall a similar "elemental" article being nuked(pun intended) a while ago. Deletion tag or speedy deletion? ScepticWombat (talk) 07:37, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
It was originally a redirect.--ZooGuard (talk) 07:56, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
A redirect to an informationless category page is pretty useless eitherway, though. If the page gets deleted, maybe redirect it to nuclear energy? 141.134.75.236 (talk) 08:03, 29 April 2015 (UTC)