Talk:Refuting anti-LGBT arguments

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Title[edit]

I tried to put in references, but I don't know what I am doing wrong. I could use a little help--Rationalzombie94 (talk) 23:38, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

You forgot to add the reflist template. :)-DiamondDisc1(talk) 23:52, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

This would work far better[edit]

in LGBT. On its own, it will never be seen. Sir ℱ℧ℤℤϒℂᗩℑᑭƠℑᗩℑƠ (talk/stalk) 00:46, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Agreed.—CheeseburgerPlate Spinning-Burger.gif (talkstalk) 19:42, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

health arguments against homosexuality cannot be refuted[edit]

As an example- "Gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men are 17 times more likely to get anal cancer than heterosexual men." https://www.cdc.gov/msmhealth/std.htm 86.14.2.77 (talk) 04:20, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Annnnd in any way how does this info, assuming its correct, affect the worth of a bisexual like me? Bugger off--Pokefrazer (talk) 04:36, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

List vs tabular format[edit]

I think a sequence of heading/description is easier to read and visually scan, as opposed to the current table layout. Thoughts? Andmartinelli (talk) 06:20, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Re:"Do not lie with a man as one lies with a woman; that is detestable."[edit]

I found this on yahoo answers:

Well, see, the later injunctions found in the Pauline letters are based on a misinterpretation of Leviticus 18:22. It's says that a man should not lie with another man as he would with a woman. All this means is a guy shouldn't tell his dude friends lies about income or sports accomplishments the way he would if was trying to impress a chick.

Is this true?—CheeseburgerPlate Spinning-Burger.gif (talkstalk) 19:50, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

No. The people writing this sort of nonsense are homosexual crackpot "historical revisionists" like Afrocentrists. These homosexual historical revisionists are attempting to re-write history and remove anti-homosexuality in ancient cultures/religions.86.14.2.77 (talk) 20:34, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
it might be bullshit but they are not trying to rewrite history. They trying fine evidence that the religion that they may sincerely and deeply believe to be true, does not hate them. AMassiveGay (talk) 22:54, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
Alright. I don't study the bible (because it's boring IMHO) so that's why I ask. If there are cranks that believe this, then it should be covered on the wiki somewhere.—CheeseburgerPlate Spinning-Burger.gif (talkstalk) 23:11, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
"Well, see, the later injunctions found in the Pauline letters are based on a misinterpretation of Leviticus 18:22. It's says that a man should not lie with another man as he would with a woman. All this means is a guy shouldn't tell his dude friends lies about income or sports accomplishments the way he would if was trying to impress a chick." Yahoo answers is the best thing. Diacelium (talk) 22:56, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Lie in Bible = lie down = fuck. Herr FüzzyCätPötätö (talk/stalk) 00:40, 15 January 2017 (UTC)