Information icon.svg Results are posted for the RationalWiki 2020 Moderator Election.
Thanks to all who participated in the vote, and congratulations to the new moderators!


From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Further information can be obtained from the several Wikipedia pages.

There are two strands to the story of R-l-C: the mythic/created story, and the 'factual works' written to put priest, place and supposed mystery in context. Jackiespeel (talk) 19:02, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

"It is claimed that ...."[edit]

Weak passive-voice bullshit. Who claims? TheoryOfPractice (talk) 01:07, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

I'm going to go one further, ToP. There is no link to this page, and not much to be gained by it. How does it support our overall mission? What is the point? Researcher (talk) 19:58, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
None, really, not in its current state, anyway (passive voice, no sources). Jackiespiel seems to have added quite a few articles on topics that might be interesting, but probably not given our mission (Black Pope, Voynich Manuscript). Hasn't been around since 12/31, but was quite active. Maybe we should ping him (her?) on his talkpage and see what he thinks? ħumanUser talk:Human 20:56, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
This could be kept, or maybe become section in somne holy blood hloy grail/Da Vinci Code article - which we don't seem to have. Totnesmartin (talk) 18:31, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Developing the subject[edit]

As a suggestion - create a "Christ's bloodline" page (under a suitable header) and have this entry, the Holy Blood, Holy Grail (which is not the correct title of the book), and other linked pages as subheadings - and redirects etc as appropriate. Jackiespeel (talk)

I think deleting would be a lot easier, since this has no footnotes or references of any kind, and isn't written particularly well. ħumanUser talk:Human 00:47, 6 January 2010 (UTC)