| There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. If everyone who saw this today donated $5, we would meet our goal for 2019. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with |
Talk:Vortex-based math
What the hell is this crap? Spud (talk) 14:58, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
- More of a comment than an article, isn't it? SophieWilder
15:16, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
- I think you're missing the great service this article provides. Just this morning, I was puzzling over whether Vortex based math was indeed one of the greatest scientific revelations of all time, like all the kids at school say. So I came to Rational Wiki and discovered, rather, that "the math that describes a vortex is pretty neat and potentially useful for this or that."
- Would you rather that I continued in my confusion? There's real value in this short article! Phiwum (talk) 15:48, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
- Any one of you could have summarily deleted this delightful bit of fluff.
- Vortex Math Returns!
- At the age of fifteen Marko Rodin projected his mind as far as he could across the universe and asked the question, "What is the secret behind intelligence?" Due to his gift of intense focus or because it was time for him to know the answer, his stomach muscles turned to iron and as he was literally lifted forward he answered out loud, "I understand."
- One may assume that this image is an enneagram-based representation of Morko Rodin's G-spot. Try to unsee that, if you can
- There is a RW article in there somewhere, but it has not made its way here yet. Sprocket J Cogswell (talk) 16:34, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
- I've sort of tried to start to fix it. I have to say I haven't laughed so much since I found Time Cube. Doxys Midnight Runner (talk) 17:12, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
- Any one of you could have summarily deleted this delightful bit of fluff.
I expanded quite a bit and added some snark. I thought it was funny, anyway. Here's an article I wouldn't be embarrassed to show to my parents. Wehpudicabok [話] [変] [留] 11:11, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
- I enjoyed writing about something other than Gamergate, for a change. Math really is fun, even bad math! :) Wehpudicabok [話] [変] [留] 11:25, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
- Is this maths going down the (bath) plughole or coming up it? 82.44.143.26 (talk) 15:38, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
It FLOWS both ways simultaneously - don't throw the bathwater! 122.59.255.207 (talk)(WHAT baby?!)
Others have got their first - eg [1] - and there are 'many, many' other such. 82.44.143.26 (talk) 16:52, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Propaganda[edit]
This Rational Wiki is irrational Wiki. Ignorant information is being persisted. What is Vortex Math? Where is the actual math and an example of the math. Rational Wiki is also wrongly attributing Vortex Math to Marko Rodin and his Coil. When the subject is looked into, there are coils and examples of vortex math going back to the eighties. Suppressing accurate information does nothing for someone who has an interest to understand what Vortex math is really about. — Unsigned, by: TimeSpaceSphere / talk / contribs