| There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. If everyone seeing this today donates $5, we will meet our goal for 2019. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with |
Template:SacredForeknowledgeChecklist
Summary of claim: The ENTER HOLY TEXT AS NOUN accurately ENTER SUMMARY OF SCIENTIFIC FOREKNOWLEDGE CLAIM, which would have been unknowable to contemporary science.
Does this statement meet all criteria necessary for ENTER HOLY TEXT AS ADJECTIVE scientific foreknowledge?
- Is it correct? No.
- Is it in the ENTER HOLY TEXT AS NOUN? No.
- Is it unambiguous? No.
- Was it outside of contemporary knowledge? No.
- Was it outside of contemporary technology? No.
8 parameters are required.
1st: The name of the sacred text
2nd: The adjective form of the name of the sacred text
3rd: Whether the claimed foreknowledge is correct
4th: Whether the claimed foreknowledge is in the sacred text
5th: Whether the claimed foreknowledge is unambiguous
6th: Whether the claimed foreknowledge was outside of contemporary knowledge
7th: Whether the claimed foreknowledge was outside of contemporary technology
8th: Whether the claimed foreknowledge fits all previous 5 criteria, in "is/isn't" form