RationalWiki's 2019 Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

If everyone seeing this today donates $5, we will meet our goal for 2019.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!

Donations so far: $2900Goal: $6000

Template:SacredForeknowledgeChecklist

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Summary of claim: The ENTER HOLY TEXT AS NOUN accurately ENTER SUMMARY OF SCIENTIFIC FOREKNOWLEDGE CLAIM, which would have been unknowable to contemporary science.
Does this statement meet all criteria necessary for ENTER HOLY TEXT AS ADJECTIVE scientific foreknowledge?

  1. Is it correct? No.
  2. Is it in the ENTER HOLY TEXT AS NOUN? No.
  3. Is it unambiguous? No.
  4. Was it outside of contemporary knowledge? No.
  5. Was it outside of contemporary technology? No.
Thus, this statement is not an example of ENTER HOLY TEXT AS ADJECTIVE scientific foreknowledge.

[edit] [purge] Documentation

8 parameters are required.

1st: The name of the sacred text

2nd: The adjective form of the name of the sacred text

3rd: Whether the claimed foreknowledge is correct

4th: Whether the claimed foreknowledge is in the sacred text

5th: Whether the claimed foreknowledge is unambiguous

6th: Whether the claimed foreknowledge was outside of contemporary knowledge

7th: Whether the claimed foreknowledge was outside of contemporary technology

8th: Whether the claimed foreknowledge fits all previous 5 criteria, in "is/isn't" form