2025 RationalWiki 'Oregon Plan' Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!
Donations so far: $7608.77Goal: $10000

Chicken coop

Fragment of a discussion from User talk:Blue
Jump to navigation Jump to search

I'm on board with this. Is it possible to move this LiquidThread to Community Standards talk, where we can hammer out some actual language to set this up? Or can you not swap a LiquidThread to a normal talk page?

ADtalkModerator05:38, 19 August 2011

This is why I was opposed to liquid threads in the first place. There might be a way to export a liquid thread, but I do not know what it is, and no doubt there will be complications.

Mjollnir.svgListenerXTalkerX05:45, 19 August 2011
 

I'm on board too, definitely. I think we also need some guidelines on when and how to close discussions and votes.

As far as I know, there's no (yet extant) way of exporting a liquidthread as wikitext.

Blue (pester)06:19, 19 August 2011