| There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. If everyone who saw this today donated $5, we would meet our goal for 2019. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with |
Pics of the day - Mar 03, 2011: Conservapedia in February 2011
| In Feb 2011, Andy and friends were a little bit more open to new editors. This policy was rewarded with an influx of trolls, and some guys who they thought to be trolls. Nevertheless, the number of editors in Feb was 187, slightly down from January - and only five months (Aug 2009, Sep-Dec 2010) were worse since Mar 2007. | |||||||||||||
| Joaquín Martínez seemed to be the most active editor at Conservapedia in Feb 2011, but keep in mind, that the numbers of Conservapedia:Active users - and in these diagrams - represent the edits still in the database, as they are take from the edit history of the contributors... | |||||||||||||
| ... while the number for the next diagrams are taken from the logs, and therefore include everything which wasn't oversighted. So, JM made 1582 edits, including numerous uploads. | |||||||||||||
Ken trumped him with 1980 edits:
A surprising number of 1425 (85%) of his comments in Feb 2011 are still in the database in Mar 1, 2011. But they won't stay there: Looking at Conservapedia:Active users from this month and the last month, one finds that ~ 2,200 of his ~ 30,000 older edits have also disappeared. |