User talk:140.198.72.167

Your welcome to RationalWiki is lukewarm at best, 140.198.72.167. This observation is due to the nature of your initial edits. Pull up a goat and try not to make trouble. We realize it is possible that you do not understand the nature of the site or our objectives. Please see our guide for newcomers and our community standards to clarify things for you. If you're still interested in contributing, please see what our articles are intended to be.

We don't appreciate it when BoN's drive by and blank from our articles, especially not with bombastic edit summaries. Please don't do that again.

That being said, many of us think that the current Ayan Hirsi Ali and Sam Harris articles are disasters, and that they will need a full rewrite from scratch at some point (as soon as there's non-abrasive manpower for it).

As such, if you calm down your triggered rhetoric a bit (about "REAL Atheists" , SJWs, "pro-islam propaganda", ""But I thought this was supposed to be RATIONALWiki!" Drink!" and the rest), you're invited to sign up with an account and help us to constructively figure out how to write brand new articles on Ali and Harris — assuming you can write (and are not completely mouth-frothing), of course.

It'll still be a pure group effort (all of RW is), and you won't last long if you blow a gasket from seeing criticism against these two included in their supposed new articles (there are negative things to say as well) — but it's not a minority view here that we should basically restart our articles on them from scratch and find angles that aren't as axe-grindingly black-and-white.

Now then... let's see if you actually take things down a few notches and get constructive like I ask you to, or if you're just another zealot — much like the nut who wrote the same smear pieces on Ali and Harris which you just blanked from (and which I think need a full rewrite, as opposed to an angry blanking).

I'm aware that I'm going far out on a limb here. For all I know, you're a random vandal. The first impression you've made certainly isn't good. But the articles you happened to blank from are so bad, that I'm actually entertaining the thought that we just got off on the wrong foot here.

You're no longer blocked, but I repeat — don't blank shit. Atleast have the common decency to concern troll the talk pages. Though, if you're the type who thinks that Islamophobia is a myth (or even good), then please — don't even waste our time.

Let's see how this pans out.

All the best, Reverend Black Percy (talk) 19:32, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

People in the fight against islamis, feminism, and cultural marxism don't need more harassment, especially from so called 'rationals'. this is called 'rationalwiki', right? do you know how much abuse and terror Hirsi lived under? how she was kicked out of her new home in Europe because of the Muslim Bloc and their regressive allies? Or how Sam Harris is one of the few sane voices left now? He's absolutely correct on things, yet all of you seem to think that him saying a few hyperbolic statements and siding with the only good society in the Middle East (Israel) makes him worthy of any mockery. if we don't follow Harris, Western Society is doomed to cultural marcxism and Islamism which is fundamentally incompataible with our very existence as a western society. just look at ISIS for proof of this, 90% of muslims SUPPORT iSIS. muslims are going to marry into OUR families and turn societ back to the dark ages.,^{— Unsigned, by: 140.198.72.167 / talk / contribs}

On talk pages, please sign your comments using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking on the sign button: on the toolbar above the edit panel. You can also indent successive talk page comments using one more colon (:) for each line. Thank you. Reverend Black Percy (talk) 19:42, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Now I almost feel stupid for having given you the benefit of the doubt.

"Western society is doomed to cultural marxism"

Thank you, bye. Reverend Black Percy (talk) 19:44, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

(edit conflict) don't be too hard on yourself, he could have quite easily been a rational person who was very frustrated at our awful articles. He wasn't though. Christopher (talk) 19:47, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

“”muslims are going to marry into OUR families and turn societ back to the dark ages.,

Unfortunately, the drive-by content blankers on RationalWiki too often turn out to be illiterate goofballs. --Cosmikdebris (talk) 19:52, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Thanks, guys. I hope it was clear enough what I was trying to do here... I still feel kinda dirty, though. "90% of all muslims support Isis"? Get the fuck out of here. Add to that Eurabia mongering, etc... I couldn't have picked a worse person to extend a chance to, could I? If this is what a Sam Harris diehard looks like, then maybe Mona wasn't as far off the mark as I thought. Reverend Black Percy (talk) 19:53, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

I really don't think whoever this guy is can be said to be representative of any group, who was Mona by the way? Something to do with Israel/Palestine? Christopher (talk) 19:58, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

If I wanted to know I could always look at the coop cases, no need to answer that. Christopher (talk) 19:59, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Nah, I'm not really saying that I think this guy represents Sam Harris (I think Sam Harris represents Sam Harris). First of all, I'm about 98% sure that this vandal supports Trump. Harris doesn't. But let me just state the obvious, for the record... Just because the current Ali/Harris articles are shit, doesn't mean that any drive-by zealot who happens to agree is my friend. Reverend Black Percy (talk) 20:04, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Mona, for all her intransigence, is at least intelligent and articulate. The BoN here is clearly an unsalted nut. --Cosmikdebris (talk) 20:16, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Yes, I certainly don't mean to equate Mona to this hate-filled numbnut. Though, all black-and-white thinkers can come across sounding much more alike than they themselves even realize. Reverend Black Percy (talk) 20:30, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Crikey! I decide to come back for a visit and what do I see? One of the purest examples of the once-thought-cryptid Harrisbot! A breed that Randroidologists should see some similarities in with their own quarry! Don't worry Percy, you did nothing wrong. Unfortunately Harrisbots seem to be an actual problem outside of the most diehard circles of r/samharris. His rhetoric is attracting a Certain Sort, wouldn't be surprised if they claim he said he was voting for Hillary because he 'feared for his job if his REAL feelings were revealed!!'. That BoN was really something though, I don't think I've seen a Harrisbot defend Hirsi before, mostly they focus everything on Sam and maybe Dawkins or Dennet. Did Sam and Hirsi do something together recently? Also love that subtle "THEY'RE COMING TO STEAL OUR WOMEN" thing, that's a new version I haven't seen yet. Hollow (talk) 23:11, 5 April 2017 (UTC)