RationalWiki's 2019 Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

If everyone who saw this today donated $5, we would meet our goal for 2019.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!

Donations so far: $2900Goal: $6000

User talk:49.193.205.142

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

IP editors aren't allowed to do anything but correct typos. It doesn't matter if you're correct and Narky Sawtooth is doing what all the other lazy groupthinkers do. Create an account and you can add any old unsourced opinion you want. Until then, here is Assistant Professor Joris Enter's new template that still misrepresents site policy. Conscience (talk) 10:30, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Alternately, your edits are shit and Conscience is also shit. Your pastebin doesn't necessitate the removal of, cf, "Fans of 8chan blamed anyone except themselves.<ref>https://i.imgur.com/e37Nmdp.png https://i.imgur.com/1nRNmGS.png</ref>" or "and the even worse '''/polpol/'''." 32℉uzzy; 0℃atPotato (talk/stalk) 10:45, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
Yes FuzzyCatPotato, because the posts of 5 users certainly represents an entire community of fans and a dead and irrelevant politics board certainly belongs on the page when the website's 2nd largest board isn't. I didn't add that in the summary as I'm pretty sure that would of gone without saying, but I guess there is no limit to how crass people like you can be. —49.193.205.142 (talk) 11:20, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
Anyone who disagrees with you and your bully buddies is shit. Conscience (talk) 10:49, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
Oh come and see the violence inherent in the system! Help! Help! I'm being repressed!--JorisEnter (talk) 10:51, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
No, Conscience, you're shit because you're a whiny holier-than-thou incompetent who thinks they speak for a community they haven't bothered to improve -- or meaningfully join. You're the quintessential back-seat driver, with an enhanced superiority complex. (For proof, you immediately drop pretenses of defending BON's edits and go back to whimpering about those nasty site-controlling thugs, me and my "buddies". Stay on subject, brave soldier.) Your disagreement is just the shit-icing on the shit-cake. Go. Away. FuzzyCatPotato of the Nigerian Oozes (talk/stalk) 11:17, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
Euge!--JorisEnter (talk) 22:12, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
Actually FuzzyCatPotato, how about YOU go away from my talk page, take your drama shitflinging with you, and stop being a self-righteous and pretentious cretin who feels the needs to start worthless little quarrels driven by unwarranted self-importance everywhere they go. Fuck you very much. —49.193.205.142 (talk) 05:48, 28 June 2016 (UTC)



Information icon.svg This is the discussion page for an anonymous user who has not created an account yet, or who does not use it.

We therefore have to use the numerical IP address to identify them. Such an IP address can be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user and feel that irrelevant comments have been directed at you, please create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users.