RationalWiki's 2019 Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

If everyone who saw this today donated $5, we would meet our goal for 2019.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!

Donations so far: $2900Goal: $6000

User talk:64.229.179.101

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
New logo large.png Your welcome to RationalWiki is lukewarm at best, 64.229.179.101.

This observation is due to the nature of your initial edits. Pull up a goat and try not to make trouble.

We realize it is possible that you do not understand the nature of the site or our objectives.

Please see our guide for newcomers and our community standards to clarify things for you.

If you're still interested in contributing, please see what our articles are intended to be.

Hi.--Bobbing up 02:05, 19 February 2009 (EST)

Every so often I like to look into the various whacky BoNs. This one is from Toronto. I didn't see that one coming. Alberta, maybe. Alabama, definitely. Toronto, no. --Edgerunner76Your views are intriguing to me and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter 09:53, 25 February 2009 (EST)


You're not going to get your edit to stick, so why bother? Totnesmartin 09:55, 25 February 2009 (EST)

I am spreading the truth of the Bible. Your godless liberal science will only lead to you hell. I suggest you believe in Him and embrace His love. 64.229.179.101 10:00, 25 February 2009 (EST)
Anybody else getting a slight blip on the Poe meter? --Edgerunner76Your views are intriguing to me and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter 10:03, 25 February 2009 (EST)
(edit conflict) Not me, this is perfectly normal Christian proselytising. I used to know some SDAs and they said far weirder things than Mr 64 here.
Incidentally please sign up here if you'd like to debate with us. Why should I believe in "Him" if there's no evidence for "Him"? Totnesmartin 10:07, 25 February 2009 (EST)
I only said slightly. The "[y]our godless liberal science" seemed a bit over-the-top. --Edgerunner76Your views are intriguing to me and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter 10:12, 25 February 2009 (EST)
IT'S A TRAP. OUR SHIELDS CAN'T REPEL CHRISTIANITY OF THAT MAGNITUDE!193.1.52.12 10:15, 25 February 2009 (EST)
Great Star Wars reference. 193, are you just someone who forgot to log in? --Edgerunner76Your views are intriguing to me and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter 10:18, 25 February 2009 (EST)
DSFARGEG reporting in from college.193.1.52.12 10:21, 25 February 2009 (EST)
You'll only win a cookie for a Star Wars reference when you use an ip address that has the numbers 1183 somewhere in it. Bondurant 10:34, 25 February 2009 (EST)
1138 surely? kTHXbai. Totnesmartin 10:40, 25 February 2009 (EST)
Curse my fat fingers, and my Ken-like inability to use preview. Bondurant 10:47, 25 February 2009 (EST)

Create an account[edit]

In all seriousness, why not create an account and present your views rather than engaging in pointless wandalism? --Edgerunner76Your views are intriguing to me and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter 10:04, 25 February 2009 (EST)

What a shame, I was hoping for a reasoned debate on the Bible but you've gone. Totnesmartin 10:55, 25 February 2009 (EST)



Information icon.svg This is the discussion page for an anonymous user who has not created an account yet, or who does not use it.

We therefore have to use the numerical IP address to identify them. Such an IP address can be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user and feel that irrelevant comments have been directed at you, please create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users.