User talk:AnarchoJesse

Your welcome to RationalWiki is lukewarm at best, AnarchoJesse. This observation is due to the nature of your initial edits. Pull up a goat and try not to make trouble. We realize it is possible that you do not understand the nature of the site or our objectives. Please see our guide for newcomers and our community standards to clarify things for you. If you're still interested in contributing, please see what our articles are intended to be.

Drive-by deletion of sections of articles is frowned upon... would you care to bring up your concerns on the talk page of the article? ħuman 16:12, 27 June 2008 (EDT)

We don't really do third person views, I'm afraid :) _{<blink>↳</blink> ↑ ⇨ ↕ ▽ ←} 16:13, 27 June 2008 (EDT)

Seriously though, if you've got some concerns present them and we'll talk about them.--Bob^{bing up} 16:26, 27 June 2008 (EDT)

I'm going to be honest, I'm not sure how the messaging system works here, but in the even that you read this, I didn't really see what sort of discussion needed to be had on something that wasn't 1.) sourced or 2.) of any sort of credibility. It's one thing to make a criticism of libertarianism on it's page, it's something totally different to make the entire page THE criticism of libertarianism.

You're probably right. If you'd like to bring up specific complaint on the relevant talk page, we'd all be glad to discuss the state of the article there. _{<blink>↳</blink> ↑ ⇨ ↕ ▽ ←} 16:34, 27 June 2008 (EDT)

I see that you've taken it to the talk page. To be honest libertarianism is something about which I personally know little. It should be interesting to see your debate on that page. Our talk pages are, in fact, often more useful than the articles for those interested in learning about issues.--Bob^{bing up} 16:51, 27 June 2008 (EDT)