| There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. If everyone who saw this today donated $5, we would meet our goal for 2019. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with |
User talk:AnarchoJesse
Drive-by deletion of sections of articles is frowned upon... would you care to bring up your concerns on the talk page of the article? ħuman
16:12, 27 June 2008 (EDT)
- We don't really do third person views, I'm afraid :) ↳ ↑ ⇨ <blink>↕</blink> <blink>▽</blink> ← 16:13, 27 June 2008 (EDT)
I'm going to be honest, I'm not sure how the messaging system works here, but in the even that you read this, I didn't really see what sort of discussion needed to be had on something that wasn't 1.) sourced or 2.) of any sort of credibility. It's one thing to make a criticism of libertarianism on it's page, it's something totally different to make the entire page THE criticism of libertarianism.
- You're probably right. If you'd like to bring up specific complaint on the relevant talk page, we'd all be glad to discuss the state of the article there. ↳
↑
⇨
<blink>↕</blink>
<blink>▽</blink>
←
16:34, 27 June 2008 (EDT)
- I see that you've taken it to the talk page. To be honest libertarianism is something about which I personally know little. It should be interesting to see your debate on that page. Our talk pages are, in fact, often more useful than the articles for those interested in learning about issues.--Bobbing up 16:51, 27 June 2008 (EDT)