| There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. If everyone seeing this today donates $5, we will meet our goal for 2019. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with |
User talk:Brxbrx/Massage
From RationalWiki
Go for it. ТyTalk. 00:49, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
- Funny, needs more substance. ТyTalk. 01:58, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
- I'll get around to it. This is just the intro. I pulled out some of my old text books for the rest. Is the style ok for RW?--Brxbrx (talk) 15:10, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
- Seems more like ED back when it was funny. But it might work :) ТyTalk. 15:16, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
- I love the intro. The use of commas is a little odd in places. Yeah, reads a bit like ED, but the intro does make a good point. Could be worth getting in some of the legitimate uses of massage. Some references would be nice - particularly to show the roots of the snark being dished-out. Concernedresident omg!!! ponies!!! 20:03, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
- I put one source in there for now, problem is my refs are all school textbooks from a private trade college: no ISBN--Brxbrx (talk) 20:06, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
- I have some books at hand that I can add as references. If you're short on refs, prod me when it's move to mainspace so I can go in and add some. Skeptic's Dictionary and Gardner cover a few areas relevant to this. The intro is definitely one of the most amusing things I've read in a while. Concernedresident omg!!! ponies!!! 20:43, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
- I put one source in there for now, problem is my refs are all school textbooks from a private trade college: no ISBN--Brxbrx (talk) 20:06, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
- I love the intro. The use of commas is a little odd in places. Yeah, reads a bit like ED, but the intro does make a good point. Could be worth getting in some of the legitimate uses of massage. Some references would be nice - particularly to show the roots of the snark being dished-out. Concernedresident omg!!! ponies!!! 20:03, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
- Seems more like ED back when it was funny. But it might work :) ТyTalk. 15:16, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
- I'll get around to it. This is just the intro. I pulled out some of my old text books for the rest. Is the style ok for RW?--Brxbrx (talk) 15:10, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
Stubby[edit]
A little stubby. Link to bullshit rather than sarcasm. ТyTalk. 19:55, 2 April 2011 (UTC)