RationalWiki's 2019 Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

If everyone seeing this today donates $5, we will meet our goal for 2019.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!

Donations so far: $2460Goal: $6000

User talk:EvanHarper/Sandbox

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Looking good so far. Any chance you could reduce the amount of redlinks? Lord of the Goons The official spikey-haired skeptical punk 05:02, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

I dunno, Goonie. The red links listed could have some merit in mainspace. Aboriginal Noise Oh, what a lovely tea party! 05:04, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
I know that. It was meant to spark ideas for future articles, not mean "get rid of them". But I can see how that was misconstrued. Lord Goonie Hooray! I'm helping! 05:06, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
Well, that makes sense now. Aboriginal Noise Oh, what a lovely tea party! 05:07, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
This article was on Wikipedia first - it even got a DYK and thousands of hits. Then the idiots deleted it as non-notable. Hence the redlinks. EvanHarper (talk) 05:09, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
I saw you originally had tons of them, but the ones you have now are fine, as they could be made into actual articles later on. Gooniepunk2010 Oi! Oi! Oi! 05:10, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
Actually, this article (when it becomes one) seems right up our alley. Right on, man! Aboriginal Noise Oh, what a lovely tea party! 05:15, 23 December 2009 (UTC)