| There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. If everyone who saw this today donated $5, we would meet our goal for 2019. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with |
User talk:Liberalscum
- Hi RobS(mith)!!! CЯacke® 21:38, 13 September 2007 (MDT)
- Holy crap, how did you know that? tmtoulouse torment 21:40, 13 September 2007 (MDT)
- I guessed, he's the only one to use "scum" "Slime" and whatnot, in edit summaries.CЯacke® 21:43, 13 September 2007 (MDT)
- Holy crap, how did you know that? tmtoulouse torment 21:40, 13 September 2007 (MDT)
- Hmm..i guess he missed us with the boycott...had to come wandalize.--PalMD-Berate Me 21:44, 13 September 2007 (MDT)
- Kudos cracker on great detective skills...I swear I will figureo ut the forum shit soon I moved it to my to-do list e-mail folder, good news is I get through 15-20 of those a day. Bad news is I get another 50 a day to add to it...... tmtoulouse torment 21:47, 13 September 2007 (MDT)
- I don't see where he used those magic wordz--PalMD-Berate Me 21:49, 13 September 2007 (MDT)
- Kudos cracker on great detective skills...I swear I will figureo ut the forum shit soon I moved it to my to-do list e-mail folder, good news is I get through 15-20 of those a day. Bad news is I get another 50 a day to add to it...... tmtoulouse torment 21:47, 13 September 2007 (MDT)
No no no. You got it wrong. It's not "Liberal scum" it's "Liberals cum." Man, RobS is a fucking perv. It's embarassing that, like Jimmy Wales and Larry Flynt, he's free to move about the country. DickTurpis 21:55, 13 September 2007 (MDT)
- LOL, the "liberal scum" comes (ahem) form the block log edit summaries over to Crapopedia: re:
(Block log); 23:44 RobS (Talk | contribs | block) (blocked "User:BevanFindlay" with an expiry time of infinite: racist liberal scum slimebag) - CЯacke® 21:57, 13 September 2007 (MDT)
- Fucking great. Now I really want to go over and see for myself, but I can't because of the goddamn boycott! See? This is what I didn't want to miss. Damn you AFL-CIO! DickTurpis 22:01, 13 September 2007 (MDT)
Holy fucking shit, Rob. I just noticed that you blanked the content of the FBI incident page. That's hilarious. Not only have you banned mentioning of the FBI over at CP, but it's been banned here too. You know, I don't think you have the jurisdiction. DickTurpis 21:59, 13 September 2007 (MDT)
- Do we have definitive proof that he's the resident spook? Locke
Always Watching...... 22:09, 13 September 2007 (MDT)
- Yes. tmtoulouse torment 22:09, 13 September 2007 (MDT)
- Ok, just thought I'd make sure before I plot diabolically. Locke
Always Watching...... 22:11, 13 September 2007 (MDT)
- Ok, just thought I'd make sure before I plot diabolically. Locke
- Yes. tmtoulouse torment 22:09, 13 September 2007 (MDT)
Rob, the difference between RW and CP is...[edit]
...you're still here. If someone tried something this blatant on Conservapedoa(sic), they'd be permabanned instantly, their IP range would be banned, every edit they'd ever made would be reverted, their talkpage blanked, and the ground salted in their hometown. Here? We point and laugh, swat you on the nose with a rolled-up short ban, and clean up the mess. Now....do you have even the faintest notion in your throbbing little brain why this is? --Gulik 22:36, 13 September 2007 (MDT)