User talk:Liberosaurus Rex

What is going on? World Blogs Clogs Elections The Bar (talk) (talk) (talk) (talk) (hic) Welcome to RationalWiki, Liberosaurus Rex! Check out our guide for newcomers and our community standards! Tell us how you found RationalWiki here! If you are interested in contributing: Read what our articles are intended to be Check out the to-do list See our help page and Wikipedia's formatting cheatsheet If writing a new article, consider writing up a draft And most importantly: Pull up a goat and have some fun!

— Dysk (contribs) 10:53, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

I'm blocked for harassment? What harassment? Disagreeing with John66? Disagreeing with John66 = trolling. Editing mistakes in his article = vandalism. Anyone that questions him is a sock of his enemy on a personal crusade against him. Evidence not needed. I notice my recommendations on Carnivore diet have now been edited in. None of the socks with names similar to mine that attacked John66 were me. How convenient. Please explain what "harassment" I have committed beyond disagreeing with John66, who frankly is wrong by the way. Liberosaurus Rex (talk) 13:22, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

You have been banned on RW on many socks before. Your recent IP addresses use the same IP range and trace to the same location:

82.132.215.120, 82.132.215.134 match the banned sock 82.132.246.186 (check the talk-page). You are the same banned person. Your obsession was racialism, 82.132.220.230 on many other 82.132 IPs has been well documented on RW, now you are trying to hide on this website on a secret stealth account. It is not rocket science to see this. The IP evidence is undeniable. Tremors (talk) 14:48, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

The IP evidence is completely deniable. It's a British mobile network. There must be millions of people using it. I'm not going to confirm or deny anything about my identity. My identity is private. I'm not going to play "are you this guy?" "no" "are you this guy?" "no" "are you this guy?" "not saying". What kind of a shit show is this when you, obviously yet another sock from the same bizarre troll group, get to throw out these bizarre personal accusations when someone questions the accuracy of articles? And your articles aren't accurate. They seem to be written more with the motivation of taking sadistic pleasure in attacking people and groups rather than any kind of truthful appraisal of the issue. My view is that you people (specifically this individual here and his associate(s)) are just a network of malicious psychopathic trolls rather than scientists. And you're obviously also the same people that made all of the impersonation socks attacking yourselves to try to "win" the discussion by getting all of your opponents banned and locking the talk page. What an absolute joke this place is. Why are you allowed around here? I can see how you would be useful if they needed someone to write sickeningly dishonest personal smear pieces to destroy the reputations of people who disagree with the regulars here. You people are lower than dog vomit. Liberosaurus Rex (talk) 15:24, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

If you search for 82.132 on RW you are the only person using it, literally, LOL. This is a limited IP range that traces to the same geographical location. Obviously you do not realise this. You used that IP range on many of your socks to argue about racialism.

But anyway. Hi Mikey "I can see how you would be useful if they needed someone to write sickeningly dishonest personal smear pieces to destroy the reputations of people who disagree with the regulars here. You people are lower than dog vomit." Thanks for confirming it is 100% you! Tremors (talk) 16:07, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ Yes there are hundreds of thousands of people on that network in that area, using that exact IP range. Yes they are all technically indistinguishable. Yes, CU/IP evidence is form of pseudoscience. However, it doesn't really matter since you don't appear to be very well suited to this website anyway, and your attitude is not conducive to the desired environment. Consider your implicit appeal to be unblocked rejected. I am not looking for a reply so will disable talk page access now. Have fun. — Dysk (contribs) 16:17, 3 March 2019 (UTC)