User talk:Lumenos/Community Standards (Lumenos)

At 07:33, 1 July 2010 (UTC) there was a fork created of this page created at Lumeniki.

Who cares? besides Lumenos, that is....P-Foster (talk) 07:37, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

He needs to tell us in three different places what he is doing on his other website, otherwise how will we possibly know? - π 07:42, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

[The Measuring consensus debate map]

You appear to be rewriting history a lot here. Parts of discussions have been removed and you are changing your responses compared with what is in the archived version. - π 03:43, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

I have merged in the only comments of someone else, that I remember deleting. I'm sure you will find that they were invaluable to the debate.

How have I re-written history? Is there any evidence of deception? I don't see the document as being purely for a historical purpose, it is better to have something that is more up to date. If I changed my mind about something someone commented on, I used strikeouts. If it wasn't commented on, and I changed it without noting it, I put a new time stamp. ~ Lumenos (talk) 09:53, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

Following Lumenos' "original edits" is hard enough. But when he refactors a page into what he calls a "debate tree" and what everyone else calls "incomprehensible" is, well, incomprehensible. ħuman 03:54, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

The only thing I "moved" was the same part that you moved when it was on your "Community Standards" talk page. Then I created a section for Bob's comments (without moving them) just like I did on this talk page. ~ Lumenos (talk) 10:03, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

It is in your userspace the only person that can delete it is you. - π 14:06, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

Did you just say I could put whatever I want in my user space and if some rouge sysop decides to repeatedly delete it, Little Brother has got my back?!?!?!? 'Cause that would be so awesome. Lumenos (talk) 03:51, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

You can do whatever you want in your user space (not user talk) within reason. Obviously if you are going to use it to post spam or liable material it will be deleted. That is why I would rather not have debates in userspace, as the user who's space it is controls it. - π 10:13, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

Depends on how fucking stupid it is. Why not post your Luminoshitty on your own damn website, since it serves no purpose here? ħuman 03:55, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

Eeearrrm, which Lumenishyshit would that be, Sir? I thought we were collaborating on a little project here. Have I broken the rules? Lumenos (talk) 04:06, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

Is he (Lumenos) a nutter or what? This is a genuine, not rhetorical, question) 14:13, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

I think he has no idea what so ever about how RationalWiki (or any other wiki for that matter) works, but he has his own strong opinions on how they should work. Back at WikiIndex he chopped up conversations according to some "debate map" idea he developed on his own wiki. The end result was nobody could follow the conversation as it was no long chronological and their comments were in different sections than they remember putting them in. So from a conventional stand point, yes. - π 14:16, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

I summarized the WikiIndex incident in three sentances here. ~ That blind moron (talk) 16:29, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

OOw oow I know this one. What's a nutter? ~ That blind moron (talk) 14:43, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

I didn't know the original conversation was going to be deleted so I treated it as a "debate map" for a short time. ~ That blind moron (talk) 14:42, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

I've ignored him up to now 'cause I thought he was a nutter but, after some rooting round the web, I see that he is! He's a nutter! So I'll go back to ignoring him. 15:09, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

I find "crazy's" interesting, personally. I must admit that if you wait a few weeks to read my posts, they are more likely to be accurate.

Any other perceptions or evaluations of my behaviour are welcome here.

~ That blind moron (talk) 16:23, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

OK. You're a self obsessed nutter! 16:25, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

Please don't blame me if you have difficulty sticking to your virtuous plan there. ~ That blind moron (talk) 16:29, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

"added link to threat"

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=User:Lumenos/Community_Standards_%28Lumenos%29&curid=101140&diff=611050&oldid=611047

You're insane. ħuman 05:42, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

Created a fork at Lumeniki

Ace McWicked and Gooniepunk do not appreciate us arguing here, and I would rather edit Lumeniki anyway. I have created a fork of this talk page there. I haven't edited it yet but I might, so just watch yourself. ~ Lumenos (talk) 07:33, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

Once again, no one cares. ħuman 09:03, 1 July 2010 (UTC)