User talk:Miekal/Archive3
Ameriwiki[edit]
Hey Mikalos, did you kill George?--Fergus Mason Thruppence I got for selling my coat, tuppence for selling my blanket. If ever I 'list for a soldier again, the Devil shall be my Sergeant. 00:57, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
Important telegraph[edit]
<flashmp3>http://www.sounddogs.com/previews/2904/mp3/377372_SOUNDDOGS__fe.mp3</flashmp3>
Or rather you would, except you don't seem to have yer 'Email user' thingy set up. Fix it at once! Peter Urist for Mod! 04:47, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
- It isn't? Oh right, i changed it to my other email but havent validated it. 2 seconds.--il'Dictator Mikal 05:29, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
- That would explain this, then. (And sent, btw.) Peter Urist for Mod! 05:50, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
- i actually only changed it recently, as for the message i replied... i think. i dont use wiki email thing much. il'Dictator Mikal 06:04, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
- It worked. Peter Urist for Mod! 06:11, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
- huzzah--il'Dictator Mikal 06:13, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
- ..can't find a good trumpet sound, dammit. Peter Urist for Mod! 06:17, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
- in no way what you probably want but heres some trumpetil'Dictator Mikal 06:22, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
- ..can't find a good trumpet sound, dammit. Peter Urist for Mod! 06:17, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
- huzzah--il'Dictator Mikal 06:13, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
- It worked. Peter Urist for Mod! 06:11, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
- i actually only changed it recently, as for the message i replied... i think. i dont use wiki email thing much. il'Dictator Mikal 06:04, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
- That would explain this, then. (And sent, btw.) Peter Urist for Mod! 05:50, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
Goats can climb steep cliffs[edit]
Arab Spring[edit]
You began this "conversation" by reverting without an explanation. Reason demands that you explain why you prefer Islamist dictatorships in Arabistan to secular dictatorships? Perhaps you hold women's rights in contempt? - Thorvelden (talk)
- Well, i decided that your support for assad and the other dictators wasnt going to doil'Dictator Mikal 17:29, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
- Wasn't going to do what exactly?
- Why can't you explain yourself? You hold yourself out as a graduate student in history. Academics explain. So explain.
Book repository[edit]
You mean like a kindle? We've legitimately had real trouble getting people to export them to here.
I've been trying to read a couple of books that I can't get in hardcopy lately. It would be really nice if I didn't have to get my laptop out to do it—I kinda get distracted. Maybe that's it? Peter Urist for Mod! 07:54, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
- Reading online is sorta a problem, why i try and do it in a way that doesnt involve having the internet. --il'Dictator Mikal 04:53, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
Name change[edit]
Whatcha want it changed to? Тytalk 04:50, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
You still a Jesus Freak?[edit]
Enquiring minds demand to know. :) --MtDPrematurely Indeterminate 16:04, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
- What? No, not for a while now--il'Dictator Mikal 16:12, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
- In that case you might just have a vote cast in your favour, son. --MtDPrematurely Indeterminate 16:14, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
- Huzzah!--il'Dictator Mikal 16:19, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
- 'ken Oath. You're properly atheist now, yes? I don't mean just SSA atheist, I'm talking at least 0.8 of a Harris or 1.4 Dawkins. --MtDPrematurely Indeterminate 16:24, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
- Sure? Not sure what those levels are :P I don't think theres a higher power or Deity/Deities if thats what your going at. --il'Dictator Mikal 16:34, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
- Considering that you're also a sodomite, that's good enough for me. --MtDPrematurely Indeterminate 16:35, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
- Huzzah!?--il'Dictator Mikal 16:37, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
- Chill baby, you got a vote. --MtDPrematurely Indeterminate 16:38, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
- Huzzah!?--il'Dictator Mikal 16:37, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
- Considering that you're also a sodomite, that's good enough for me. --MtDPrematurely Indeterminate 16:35, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
- Sure? Not sure what those levels are :P I don't think theres a higher power or Deity/Deities if thats what your going at. --il'Dictator Mikal 16:34, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
- 'ken Oath. You're properly atheist now, yes? I don't mean just SSA atheist, I'm talking at least 0.8 of a Harris or 1.4 Dawkins. --MtDPrematurely Indeterminate 16:24, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
- Huzzah!--il'Dictator Mikal 16:19, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
- In that case you might just have a vote cast in your favour, son. --MtDPrematurely Indeterminate 16:14, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
Your breakdown[edit]
Hi Mikal, in case you wanted them, here's your breakdown.
Candidate | Rank | Count |
Mikal | 1 | 4 |
Mikal | 2 | 1 |
Mikal | 6 | 1 |
Mikal | 7 | 1 |
Mikal | 9 | 1 |
Mikal | 11 | 2 |
Mikal | 13 | 2 |
Mikal | 14 | 1 |
Mikal | 15 | 1 |
Mikal | 16 | 1 |
Mikal | 17 | 3 |
Mikal | 18 | 2 |
Mikal | 19 | 1 |
Cheers VOXHUMANA 04:56, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
Conspiracy[edit]
G-Fitz is alive!!!!
Civ5[edit]
So, reading from your post, I see you play CiV. Have any interesting stories from the game? The Heidelberg Kid (talk) 20:05, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
- Not really interesting, but theres never any uranium where you need it -.- Also, I learned that when you have to Kingdoms of Israel (David and Solomon) they absolutely hate eachother. --Mikal Harass Follow 20:18, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
- Is it worth the money to buy? I'm still on 4 - not sure i want to switch to 5. (and no, i don't use roman numerals. they are very dyslexic UN FRIENDLY)--GodotL'important c'est d'aimer 20:27, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
- I'm still on Civ 3. ТyAsk me about frog-backed securities 20:32, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
- Hubby likes 3 more than 4. I want one that really does focus on diplomacy and religion far more than warfare. but i guess i'm just not a real human. ;-)
- I have 1 & ToT around here somewhere. ТyAsk me about frog-backed securities 21:01, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
- TOT? i'm doing Cesar as a city building. I want something inbetween city building and the non war aspects of civ. but - don't exist.--GodotL'important c'est d'aimer 21:06, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
- Test of time, civ 2 with fantasy mode, sci-fi mode, and you kept playing once you reached alpha centauri... on Alpha Centauri. ТyAsk me about frog-backed securities 21:24, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
- I have a copy of Civ 3 complete somewhere in my room, i have civ 4 installed on my desktop but i havent played it in a while and my favorite is personally civ 2. However, i think its worth the money, and they redid diplomacy and readded religion into civ 5's expansion. I also rarely do anything involving war unless i have to, or want the resources they have :D --Mikal Harass Follow 21:09, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
- TOT? i'm doing Cesar as a city building. I want something inbetween city building and the non war aspects of civ. but - don't exist.--GodotL'important c'est d'aimer 21:06, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
- I have 1 & ToT around here somewhere. ТyAsk me about frog-backed securities 21:01, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
- Hubby likes 3 more than 4. I want one that really does focus on diplomacy and religion far more than warfare. but i guess i'm just not a real human. ;-)
- I'm still on Civ 3. ТyAsk me about frog-backed securities 20:32, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
- Is it worth the money to buy? I'm still on 4 - not sure i want to switch to 5. (and no, i don't use roman numerals. they are very dyslexic UN FRIENDLY)--GodotL'important c'est d'aimer 20:27, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
I've played all the main Civs, some expansions, and Alpha Centauri (original, not Alien Crossfire). Civ1 and 2 I got free download online (needed a special MS-DOS program to run Civ1). Civ3 and Civ4 (and their expansion packs) I kept in a red CD case along with World of Goo and other games I really liked, but I lost the case a couple years ago (probably losing over $100 in the process) and haven't seen it since. Probably will need to get them again when my budget permits. Civ5's on Steam, so no need to get a CD. My computer toaster doesn't really like fun games (yay Minecraft). I'll probably be getting an Ultrabook soon or something. Are giant death robots worth building? o_O
(Oh, and did they really add Solomon to the game? There's no evidence of a kingdom of his magnitude in his temporal period. If he existed at all (which is very unlikely), he would've been a goat herder or something.) The Heidelberg Kid (talk) 21:28, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
- I downloaded a mod for it (Both Israel factions i have). I also have to make sure when i play mod games i turn off the ancients (playing against a civ that gets wonder build rates of 1/20, a unique Death robot (which arent actually that practical on account of being the last thing you have in the tech tree before future tech) and a Monument that gives +3 faith, culture, science food and production...)Mikal Harass Follow 21:34, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
- (ec) Call me an old-timer, but Civ II is also still my favorite. Although putting all your research into getting Leonardo's Workshop early game does kind of break it. Nebuchadnezzar (talk) 21:28, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
65[edit]
65 what? Bodies? Million dollars? If the latter, you forgot the 'way' in 'getaway.' Peter This is not my first temporal anomaly 07:26, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
- Speed. Testing via not caring about speed limits at 11 at night and normal driving has led me to discover my car is in dire need of work if i want to actually use the interstate to cross town instead of the normal streets.Now if i could have 65mil that'd be pretty awesome as well. --Mikal Harass Follow 07:47, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
Email[edit]
^ТyAsk me about frog-backed securities 02:58, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
- Yahoos mail is probably the only part of it i haven't destroyed via noscript and adblock. also replied.--Mikal Harass Follow 03:06, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
James E. Carter is the source of your ignorance about basic literacy[edit]
Actually, that phrase does not indicate that Romney gained the nomination, which is an important current event. It is also not referenced anywhere else in the article. Stop using Soros money and listening to Swift, and get some education! I'm a high school dropout and I know better.--Elvis is King (talk) 21:22, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
- That's nice. --Mikal Harass Follow 21:31, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
- What's this crap about? I could be doing Statistics homework, but I don't seem to care. What did J. break this time? --Bona fide Taylor Swift lover, according to Conservapedia admins! (talk) 21:37, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Joy![edit]
Thank you for the block sir may I haz another? Must be nice to fuck with people who cannot defend themselves! Matzosphere (talk) 18:09, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
Block[edit]
I unblocked this user because it's not clear if the user was trolling or was making a joke at the expense of the Religious right. New users should get the benefit of any doubt. Proxima Centauri (talk) 14:25, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
Ayn Rand[edit]
It would seem your ideology is generally opposed to philosopher's like Ayn Rand. I was wondering if you could detail why dates and ages weren't important in biographies? I think your worldview is getting in the way of your objectivity. Guidedog (talk) 17:15, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
- "I think your worldview is getting in the way of your objectivity.", "It would seem your ideology is generally opposed to philosopher's like Ayn Rand." I don't know much about rands philosophy, i truly don't care to learn either. And my worldview has nothing to do with me saying "we aren't writing a biography on Ayn Rand, Theres No need to go into the minute details of her exact age and the date when it happened". (Dates like death are different) --Mikal Harass Follow 20:11, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
Monarchy[edit]
I don't expect you to stop deleting my additions, but could you at least attempt an edit summary so I can see what the supposed problem is. Peterdjones (talk) 12:08, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
- I agree. There is too much deletion going on without giving proper reasons and some of it is just trolling. Proxima Centauri (talk) 12:18, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
Get lost idiot[edit]
This was said to you, many thanks for attention if you still have any. Whatever you say now about me i don't give a dmn, because i have serious reasons not to appreciate you that much. Thanks again.Okasaki (talk) 22:30, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
Seriously?[edit]
You're gonna symbolically block a guy who just got here and who has no blocking rights himself, and make a snotty comment in the process over a freakin' lame joke in an edit comment? OnTheInternetNobodyKnowsYou'reAGod (talk) 19:22, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
- Whatever will you do without those 3 lost seconds of editing time. You also did say "Discuss"--Mikal Harass Follow 19:37, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
Christpedia[edit]
http://christpedia.wikinet.org/wiki/Main_Page
Here's the link to it for whenever you want to start working on it. Inquisitor Sasha Ehrenstein des Sturmkrieg Sector 17:47, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
I usually try to ignore you[edit]
But why the hell are you unblocking Nutty Roux? So he can continue to edit war over my user and talk pages? Back off.--"Shut up, Brx." 02:11, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
- you should know blocking him would be a waste of time anyways brx. --Mikal Harass Follow 02:14, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
Webcomics[edit]
What have you got in your folder? I need suggestions for what to read next. I can't face another set of exams without good procrastination material. Peter Subsisting on honey 05:02, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
- Sparse as im to lazy to look for many, but Scandanavia and The World, Order of the Stick, Manly guys doing manly things, Final Fantasy VII: The Sevening, Oglaf (NSFW), Saturday morning breakfast Cereal and this list--Mikal Harass Follow 05:16, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
- I've read some of those, but I'll look at the rest. Here are some of mine. Peter Subsisting on honey 06:23, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
Your re-op of Nutty Roux[edit]
Just so you know you are responsible for what he then did, again, and for what ensues. Enjoy. --Abd (talk) 02:52, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
- Don't listen to this guy. The only person responsible for Nutty is Nutty. Theory of Practice Haters gonna hate. 02:53, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
Thanks[edit]
...for that. I'll go back to sleep now. Prodigal (talk) 17:12, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Don't drop hour-long blocks on non-sysops.[edit]
Don't do that. Dude is editing exclusively in the Forum. Don't like what he writes? don't read it. Theory of Practice Still tryin' to figure it all out. 03:21, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
Request for input[edit]
As a student of American history, whaddyathink? Anti-Fed crankery was the official position of the Democratic Party in 1912 ("We oppose the so-called Aldrich bill or the establishment of a central bank), essentially Ron Paul's woo-economics. Should a reference be made in either RW article? nobsCorporations are people, too 18:50, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
- -Shrug- dunno. Also I'm a student of European and Near Eastern History, not American.--Mikal Harass Follow 01:58, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
- Pardone. I thought as a 'Mercan interested in US politics you'd be interested. nobsCorporations are people, too 16:47, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
Are you fucking brain-damaged?[edit]
We don't block people for being trolls, especially when they haven't made any real edits yet. We don't drop long-term blocks on people (unless they are proven spammers) without some sort of discussion. You've been here long enough to know how it works, fucking act like it. Theory of Practice Still tryin' to figure it all out. 15:37, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
- based on This edit, i saw little hope that we were in store for anything more then petty Wiki-vandalism, hence my "not wasting time" comment in the block, though... you are correct.--Mikal Harass Follow 15:41, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
Really?[edit]
When did we decide what constitutes "offensive speech"? This isn't a pedophile apologist (so far), as far as holocaust deniers are concerned...they exist and odious as their "ideas" are maybe deleting their castle user page only reinforces their idea that the powers that be will stamp out "truth" (as they see it), simply because that is what power does. Matzosphere (talk) 04:17, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
RE: Ha?[edit]
I thought it was pretty funny. Inquisitor Sasha Ehrenstein des Sturmkrieg Sector 04:08, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
- It made me chuckle a little but but... thats about it. Though the "Ha?" was more of a "i don't get why" and not "funny?"--Mikal Harass Follow 04:22, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
- I suppose it's not really that funny. It's probably more the potential humor if someone did something with it and it took a long time for the Antiwomanists to catch onto what it is. Inquisitor Sasha Ehrenstein des Sturmkrieg Sector 05:26, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
keep out of other people's discussions unless you have something to contribute.[edit]
Thanks.
Dirk Steele (talk) 21:19, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
I Just Love a Minor Parteh Candidate[edit]
In honour of your persistence in the face of eternity, I'll once again send my primary vote your way. Anyone else on that ballot you think I should preference? I was hoping to find Sophie on the list but alas... --MtDPrematurely Indeterminate 05:09, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
- -shrug- There isn't particularly anybody on the list I dislike, so I can't really just suggest one. And this is how we win victories my friend, by showing up every time slowly building support! --Mikal Harass Follow 07:23, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
- No, this is how you get to be a third party loser. If you want office you must take it. Build a team of dedicated cadres. Don't let rank incompetents like ToP, Blue or the Lefter-Than-Thou Godot take it from you. Oy, no wonder that dessicated old cross-dresser David Gerard is running for office. --MtDPrematurely Indeterminate 09:52, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
- It's aussies like you that make your country think coalition governments are bad things. Peter Subsisting on honey 10:37, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
- Campaign, dude. sterilesporadic heavy hitter 13:40, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
- It's aussies like you that make your country think coalition governments are bad things. Peter Subsisting on honey 10:37, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
- No, this is how you get to be a third party loser. If you want office you must take it. Build a team of dedicated cadres. Don't let rank incompetents like ToP, Blue or the Lefter-Than-Thou Godot take it from you. Oy, no wonder that dessicated old cross-dresser David Gerard is running for office. --MtDPrematurely Indeterminate 09:52, 31 December 2012 (UTC)