RationalWiki's 2019 Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

If everyone seeing this today donates $5, we will meet our goal for 2019.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!

Donations so far: $2900Goal: $6000

User talk:Nuhai

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
New logo large.png Welcome to RationalWiki, Nuhai!

Please see our guide for newcomers and our community standards.

Tell us how you found RationalWiki here!

If you are interested in contributing:

Before removing large chunks from an article, please discuss it on the talkpage first. Thanks. --PsyGremlinSiarad! 14:33, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

I'm pretty sure Glynn Harrison and I would disagree profoundly on many major issues but I agree with you that our article is not worthy of us. I've marked it for deletion. We shall see. Innocent Bystander (talk) 17:06, 11 November 2013 (UTC)