User talk:Puma Kitten

Your welcome to RationalWiki is lukewarm at best, Puma Kitten. This observation is due to the nature of your initial edits. Pull up a goat and try not to make trouble. We realize it is possible that you do not understand the nature of the site or our objectives. Please see our guide for newcomers and our community standards to clarify things for you. If you're still interested in contributing, please see what our articles are intended to be.

You're welcome to your opinions on Hillary, but it might be better to discuss them on the talk page before making controversial edits to the article, right after creating your user name. Any way, welcome to the dollhouse. Bondurant 07:41, 17 February 2009 (EST)

If you'd like to discuss the articles rather than putting silly comments into them, then you are welcome here. We're a friendly bunch, really. If you persist, though, you'll end up in the vandal bin Bondurant 07:58, 17 February 2009 (EST)

You're just another bunch of Hillary haters from the look of it. Hillary is right of center? The Democratic party used to roll over to Bush until the Obamabots took over? what garbage.Puma Kitten 08:03, 17 February 2009 (EST)

We're not some amorphous lump, all with the same opinions, you know. I'm not sure what the rational behind the right-of-centre comment is, but you're welcome to discuss it on the talk page and get it changed. Being from the UK, every polititian in the US is right of centre, though. Bondurant 08:05, 17 February 2009 (EST)

I've said this before. Center is defined as Emperor Palpatine here in the U.S., so Puma is right from a cetain point of view. --Edgerunner⁷⁶_{Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?} 08:12, 17 February 2009 (EST)

Not a sock of that ultra feminist one from a while back is it? ArmondikoV^pathetic 08:16, 17 February 2009 (EST)

Keep quiet, lest CUR overhears you. Innocent until proven otherwise is the RW way, I thought. (As opposed to the CP way, which is "Suspects are guilty. Period. Otherwise, they wouldn't be suspects, would they?"). Bondurant 08:21, 17 February 2009 (EST)

Too late, the edit to the cat essay got my attention. What radical feminest? And why can't I hear this? And Puma Kitten, take it from a cat here: DO NOT MESS WITH THE MOB. --"CUR^talk 17:20, 17 February 2009 (EST)

True. But I think a cool down block vandal bin lest their be an edit war over sexism. ArmondikoV^pathetic 08:29, 17 February 2009 (EST)

I'm surprised a PUMA didn't find their way here earlier. Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 12:24, 17 February 2009 (EST)

Barnstar

		Barnstar
		For your tireless contributions to RationalWiki, I award you this barnstar.

Vandal bin

I have Vandal binned you, as warned, for disruptive edits. If you feel you'd like to discuss your contributions to this site on the talk pages rather than entering into edit wars, then let us know, and you will be paroled. Bondurant 08:29, 17 February 2009 (EST)

I was just about to extend the same invitation. Yes, we get it, you're a PUMA and you've got something to say. However, please say it on the talk pages first. --Arcan ¡ollǝɥ 08:30, 17 February 2009 (EST)

Just two other points. I agreed with your edit to the Sarah Palin article. The other point is that Palin herself made a joke about the difference between a Rottweiler pitbull and a "Hockey Mom" being lipstick. Given her otherwise repugnent views on - well - just about anything, it's only a short hop from a rottweiler pitbull to a pig. Bondurant 08:33, 17 February 2009 (EST)

Fall Down

Look him up and talk to him. I think he will like you. I knew he would come in handy some day! --"CUR^talk 18:03, 17 February 2009 (EST)