User talk:Samurai Fish

Yeah, good luck with all that. - User $\pi$ 04:55, 22 December 2008 (EST)

You are now in the vandal bin. You are permitted to 2 edits per hour. If you use them wisely you will be released from the vandal bin. - User $\pi$ 05:31, 22 December 2008 (EST)

Hi. I'm not sure why you're in the vandal bin as the sysop who put you there doesn't say here. If you'd like to know about us then our RationalWiki:Newcomers' guide may help. It also explains our position in respect of CP.--Bob^{bing up} 06:01, 22 December 2008 (EST)

Sorry I didn't explain why.

1. Stupid pretending to fit in article
2. Stupid user talk comments.
3. Begging for sysopship in an unentertaining manner

But the actual reason was tampering with the archives. A big no-no in my books. - User $\pi$ 06:07, 22 December 2008 (EST)

Looks like simple peurile silliness to me. It's easily done quite innocently if you don't know how a community works and just dive in (a generally okay tactic for internet forums but this can backfire when you misjudge). We just need to wait and see if it's malicious or innocent. ArmondikoV^{d hominem} 06:41, 22 December 2008 (EST)

I've paroled him on the basis he (1) may not have realised that we have such a firm injunction against messing with archives (2) He got no warning or explanation about what he was doing wrong.--Bob^{bing up} 07:48, 22 December 2008 (EST)

I'm not impressed with a "new" user who jumps in and messes with a talk page archive, and says "muahaha" too much ;) Time will tell... ħuman 13:34, 22 December 2008 (EST)

Neither am I. But let's give him a chance. He'll either hang himself or become a member of the community.--Bob^{bing up} 14:04, 22 December 2008 (EST)

Like I said, time will tell. What I meant was I saw no problem with the v-binning, but also see no problem with the wait and watch approach either. ħuman 16:03, 22 December 2008 (EST)