User talk:SeanTheSheep

Welcome and stuff. --ויִכִּ נתֶּרֶפּרֶתֵּר ^{שְׁלֹום!}

Thanks. Some of my edits have been really terrible recently, so I thought I would pull my socks up. ;-) --SeanTheSheep 04:56, 28 May 2007 (CDT)

A very warm welcome SeanTheSheep - I hope you have your woolly jumper on. It's always always nice to see a new face round here !=). ɱɑδ ɱ¡ɳ^{blow in my ear}/_{I did this!} 07:34, 28 May 2007 (CDT)

Early Music

Please hurry up on this stuff! I'd love to learn more! I'm planning on doing up some maths/physics stuff so mayhaps proofreading swaps on articles? (Don't forget the adrian edmonson/rik mayall dynasty...) αιρδισΗ^ταλκ 05:11, 28 May 2007 (CDT) Hi Airdish Please check out thse edits:

• http://www.conservapedia.com/Josquin_Desprez
• http://www.conservapedia.com/Leonin
• http://www.conservapedia.com/P%C3%A9rotin
• http://www.conservapedia.com/Organum
• http://www.conservapedia.com/Ockeghem
• http://www.conservapedia.com/Dufay

Shortly after I did these (which are all fine), I got zapped for being a troll. I think it started because I told Ed Poor he should keep his nose out of the Average article, as he obviously didn't know anyhting about maths.--SeanTheSheep 05:18, 28 May 2007 (CDT)

Cool, thanks! I can't believe i'm looking at CP for factual information! αιρδισΗ^ταλκ 05:28, 28 May 2007 (CDT)

Yes, I have plans to transport them here. What I do with the ones in CP is anybod's guess ;-) --SeanTheSheep 05:43, 28 May 2007 (CDT)

To kill a a cat - or, A Fox in Sheep's clothing?

You might say sorry to others as well at Conservapedia. I was defending you yesterday, but now I understand what you are doing. I seem to have been implicated in your little game, becuse I have now been designated a sock of someone I have never heard of. But have now rumbled you:

Your edits yesterday to all the Scottish stuff were telling. No-one without inside knowledge could have gone through all of those articles without inside knowledge. You knew where to go, where to look, and what is more, did it with speed. You started arguing with someone who turned out to have three sockpuppets. If this isn't a setup I don't know what is. I accidentally started arguing with you because I thought that the zealous edit you made was a genuine error. I suspect that this time you really are up to no good, in your own words:

Many apologies to all if my posting above caused any offence or any difficulties for any of you. I understand that some editors may have been affected by a "little local difficulty" at the other place.

Because of that, and because of the difficulty in knowing who your friends really are (I love the lot of you, honest), I have decided to lie low for a while, and do some important jobs elsewhere - one in particular is commanding my attention. Those of you who know me will understand.

To those who are not quite sure about any of this, I will just say that in the past I have been known to engage in subtleness, double entendres, underhandedness, deceit, spreading paranoia, trolling and generally causing as much disruption as I can. Most, but not all of that is about to change, at least for the time being, as CatWatcher will not be posting any more here for a while, or doing any more edits.

You are indeed devious, CatWatcher, or should I say Mr Fox, or SeanTheSheep or Ferret (you didn't think I spotted that one, did you. Unfortunately, what gets you in the end is the M.O., you just can't resist the 'animal' connection, can you?). Checking out Ferret's edits are very revealing.

I hope that your plans to deceive the people at Conservapedia (and RationalWiki for that matter) come to nought, and Andrew sees right through this little charade. I think they both ought to know what a devious and cunning animal they are taking into their midst.

--AvengingAngel 07:16, 1 June 2007 (CDT)

Insert ominous music drop here...Dunh dunh dunhhhh....DocSock 07:19, 1 June 2007 (CDT)

You don't have to run with the flock!

• Why does everyone here refuse to follow their own rules? Why don't you accede to my reasonable demands? Why are you all so confused about how to follow rules? Make me a sysop! Bet you thought this was someone else. human^{be in} 22:21, 1 June 2007 (CDT)

Thought I'd just pop round to test my latest sig. God's peed ^{Babel fish}ÅЯ†ђŮŖ ÐΣй†_{Now look here!} 09:57, 12 June 2007 (CDT)

Users of RationalWiki's past

It's quite fascinating to go back to the earliest parts of the User Creation Log. --Edgerunner⁷⁶_{Save me Jebus!} 17:54, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

You're right - I didn't know I joined before Genghis. Shit, I've been here two and a half years (or if you count my flouncings-out, four months). Totnesmartin 07:57, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

Genghis wasn't my original persona. Генгис^{Is the Pope a Catholic?} 08:22, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

I'm still here....--CatWatcher 19:47, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

Hi, Sean. Long time no see. Some great times with the parody articles, which are largely still there. Генгис^{Is the Pope a Catholic?} 21:07, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, There are still several on Cp that I can't believe still haven't been rumbled. There is one especially where I recycled stuff that had been deleted from Melchester as obscene and re-transported it into another location. Unfortunately I haven't had the time recently to devote to these pursuits. For some reason I have got sucked into playing on-line browser strategy games. Nice to hear from you --CatWatcher 07:31, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

Wow, Edge's new project bears fruit. Nice to see you again, Sean! ħuman 09:53, 4 October 2009 (UTC)