User talk:Smellingkate
|
Your welcome to RationalWiki is lukewarm at best, Smellingkate.
This observation is due to the nature of your initial edits. Pull up a goat and try not to make trouble. We realize it is possible that you do not understand the nature of the site or our objectives. Please see our guide for newcomers and our community standards to clarify things for you. If you're still interested in contributing, please see what our articles are intended to be. |
I doubt that anybody here cares much about ED. I sure as hell don't. But we don't much like seeing RW torn up with childish vandalism & trolling. You're blocked for an hour. Try not to be such a prick when you come back. Wéáśéĺóíď
Methinks it is a Weasel 00:08, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
- "ED is for niggers." Reminds me of the line in American History X when Ed Norton says "weed is for niggers." Also, can please you fuck off if all you're here to do is throw about racist terminology? I'm sure you can appreciate the fact that we aren't going to change our stance on the word. SJ Debaser 00:27, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
- Smellingkate is just running out of places to whine. SK went apeshit over a search-and-replace bot action on ED, got blocked there for a week, went to WP, managed to get indefinitely blocked within one minute after their first and only pre-block edit - at least the only one that made it past the filters - and is now here. Did I mention that all of that apparently happened within the last 24 hours? Yeah, I don't see much potential here. --Sid (talk) 00:32, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
Why?[edit]
Why am I not allowed to edit this site just for expressing a fucking opinion? And by the way, ED is censoring far more than just niggers now. Rule 34 images are being deleted at a fast rate. By tomorrow morning I highly doubt there will even be any sexual references on the site. It has become more of a G-rated pile of shit than Uncyclopedia. Smellingkate (talk) 03:37, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
- I'm sure your use of racial slurs has nothing to do with it. But I'm not the one in charge here. Majintahu (talk) 03:47, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
- Do you approve of the FUCKING censorship of what was once the graetest site on the web? I'll point out that the censorship goes far beyond simply the deletion of racism. The site is becoming fucking G-RATED!!! Smellingkate (talk) 03:51, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
- I do approve. Mostly because I feel ED is an awful site, with no real purpose. I'm sure you'll find many here that share that opinion. You are certainly entitled to your opinion, but don't think people here are going to join your cause. I'm sure /b/ has something planned. Probably more DDOSing, and maybe mass e-mails. Majintahu (talk) 03:55, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
- If you look at the Thizzlehat Junction Center, you'll see it is obviously not simply trolling. The admins seem to be pretty fucking dead serious about censoring ED and turning it into a nigger-loving, conservative-loving, jew-loving piece of family-friendly shit. Smellingkate (talk) 04:01, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
- (ECx2) You are blocked for repeatedly inserting inappropriate material over objections and warnings from numerous sysops and bureaucrats - I.e., vandalism. This isn't fucking ED. Which, by the way, is and was a fucking terrible site. And nobody gives a fuck about it here. Blue (is useful) 04:04, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
- Actually, I gave a fuck about it. Web (talk) 05:16, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
- Hello, web, would you like to help start a new ED formed from the ashes of what used to be the lulz? Smellingkate (talk) 06:00, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
- Actually, I gave a fuck about it. Web (talk) 05:16, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
- (ECx2) You are blocked for repeatedly inserting inappropriate material over objections and warnings from numerous sysops and bureaucrats - I.e., vandalism. This isn't fucking ED. Which, by the way, is and was a fucking terrible site. And nobody gives a fuck about it here. Blue (is useful) 04:04, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
- If you look at the Thizzlehat Junction Center, you'll see it is obviously not simply trolling. The admins seem to be pretty fucking dead serious about censoring ED and turning it into a nigger-loving, conservative-loving, jew-loving piece of family-friendly shit. Smellingkate (talk) 04:01, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
- I do approve. Mostly because I feel ED is an awful site, with no real purpose. I'm sure you'll find many here that share that opinion. You are certainly entitled to your opinion, but don't think people here are going to join your cause. I'm sure /b/ has something planned. Probably more DDOSing, and maybe mass e-mails. Majintahu (talk) 03:55, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
- Do you approve of the FUCKING censorship of what was once the graetest site on the web? I'll point out that the censorship goes far beyond simply the deletion of racism. The site is becoming fucking G-RATED!!! Smellingkate (talk) 03:51, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
Why you so racist, Dawg?[edit]
!!!WARING!!! Links to porno and stuff: ED's article on Metapedia is funny. ED is not racist. It is like being not Jewish or something. I guess because they post all those "anti-white" cartoons from WAR (without attribution?)? Or because all the jokes are based on things they don't believe? I have great plans for Lumeniki's not racist article. If you have a black friend you're a racist, so that won't work. I've got a LONG list of favorite Jews to prove I'm not racist. Comparison charts to measure notable wikis' not racistness. I think we should have pleasant competitions between races. Who is the most benevolent race? Who is the smartest (not just IQ)? And be serious. We need to know the truth of these matters so we will know if we should breed and and and who we can trust. Stuff like that. It is complicated and controversial however I think it makes as much sense as having competitions between schools. It could lead to excellence and other good things. Unicow (talk) 23:29, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
- The A. Wyatt Mann article was part of the what shaped me into who I am today. That and a few others. I saw most of them back in 2007 or 2009 and they epitomized Lulz in every way imaginable. It is likely that they are next to be destroyed by the admins. Smellingkate (talk) 04:27, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
- So that is the author of those comics. Thanks. CP = Jack Chick, ED = A. Wyatt Mann. Not all the racist stuff is nearly as entertaining, IMO. ED is so full of it, I can't believe what you are saying. But I took a look at TJC and saw an interesting comment. Changing "sand nigger" to "Arab" makes it MOAR racist. What are they trying to say that all Arabs are sand niggers? There are much better ways to deal with prejudice rather than censorship. Unicow (talk) 17:51, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
Protip[edit]
Revert warring won't get you anywhere. Why don't you make an anti-ed wiki or something and leave us alone? We don't give a fuck about you or ed or the little tempest in a teapot that brought you here. -- Nx / talk 07:55, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
- Please forgive me special br/other. Ey's quite the team player. Nx once described RW as (what was it?) a place for retired btards, or something. The delicious irony is that we once had a massive argument at WikiIndex over whether Wikipedia was more effective at refuting the psuedo-science and whatnot. Those were good times and Nx' machismo could rival UncleHo (except he doesn't kill people AFAIHaveRead). Can even admit ey's wrong sometimes. Fascinating. Unicow (talk) 18:30, 26 January 2011 (UTC)