User talk:Toast/Archive02

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Moreover, stop archiving material you don't want to deal with. It is just cowardly. Cubic harmonic Phantom Hoover! 14:49, 26 March 2009 (EDT)
It should be fairly obvious that archiving things just because you hate the person who said them is out of line. Cubic harmonic Phantom Hoover! 14:55, 26 March 2009 (EDT)
It's just a more acceptable form of  K e n D o l l ' s  deletion of comments on his talk page that don't suit him. Cubic harmonic Phantom Hoover! 14:57, 26 March 2009 (EDT)
Fine. Censor your talk page, but accept what is possibly my first swearing on this wiki: fuck off, you pathetic bully. Cubic harmonic Phantom Hoover! 14:59, 26 March 2009 (EDT)
CUR shouldn't have called you an ass, but who can blame him, given how vile you are towards him. What I take issue at is the fact that you moved an active discussion into a place which is, by community agreement, read-only, despite the fact that it was nowhere near the size for archiving. Indeed, the only reason you did so was that you like picking on an editor who commented in the thread. Go on, give a justification other than "it's my talkpage, and I can do whatever I want with it". Cubic harmonic Phantom Hoover! 15:13, 26 March 2009 (EDT)
I don't really have to justify myself to you but here: Justification: removal of offensive comment. I have not interacted with CUR other than to desysop him after he went on a stupid & offensive block : " 16:48 (cur; last) . . ConservapediaUndergroundResistor (Talk | contribs | block) (blocked User:Toast with an expiry time of 31416 seconds (account creation disabled): I hate you.)" I believe that this was totally justified. ToastToastand marmite 15:18, 26 March 2009 (EDT)
No it isn't. You have been very nasty to CUR in the past, and he is perfectly justified in hating you. Anyway, your talk page isn't your property. It belongs to the community, and you cannot just prevent further discussion because you don't like what is said. Cubic harmonic Phantom Hoover! 15:22, 26 March 2009 (EDT)
I have scrupulously avoided any interaction with CUR for ages now and I don't see that "You are an ass" is in any way a reasonable discussion header. Had it been less confrontational, then I wouldn't have done what I did. ToastToastand marmite 15:29, 26 March 2009 (EDT)
A little blast from the past... Mjollnir.svgListenerXTalkerX 15:33, 26 March 2009 (EDT)
What's wrong with that? ToastToastand marmite 15:40, 26 March 2009 (EDT)
You used an offensive heading there, and I bet you would have whinged if Listener had archived it without discussion. Cubic harmonic Phantom Hoover! 15:42, 26 March 2009 (EDT)
There's a difference between being offensive about content & being offensive about a person. ToastToastand marmite 15:46, 26 March 2009 (EDT)
The link was a response to your remark about the header being "too confrontational." Mjollnir.svgListenerXTalkerX 15:52, 26 March 2009 (EDT)
Especially considering that talk-pages are community property. Mjollnir.svgListenerXTalkerX 15:16, 26 March 2009 (EDT)


Close, but no cigar. And my neighbor has replaced those ugly blue doors with new, hyper-insulated ones. His '69 AMX project is hidden behind the far left one. ħumanUser talk:Human 23:31, 31 March 2009 (EDT)

I know, but it's as near as you can get with streetview. ToastToastand marmite 10:49, 1 April 2009 (EDT)
If you went about two "clicks" up the highway you could turn left and see my roof and car... ħumanUser talk:Human 22:13, 10 April 2009 (EDT)

You have been blocked[edit]

Please reconsider your conduct. — Unsigned, by: MarcusCicero / talk / contribs

How amusing. ToastToastand marmite 13:48, 1 April 2009 (EDT)
Stop doing that. Or you'll be blocked again. MarcusCicero 13:50, 1 April 2009 (EDT)
Do you really hate men? Neveruse513 13:50, 1 April 2009 (EDT)
Of course she does. She's a man hating demon. Who eats men. MarcusCicero 13:55, 1 April 2009 (EDT)
But they are so tasty!--Sun mowse.pngEn attendant Godot"«Let the credulous and the vulgar continue to believe that all mental woes can be cured by a daily application of old Greek myths to their private parts. V.Nabokov» 13:56, 1 April 2009 (EDT)
Piffle! Kittens are tastier by far! Cubic harmonic Phantom Hoover! 14:02, 1 April 2009 (EDT)


Seriously epic. You know what I'm talking about. Z3rotalk 17:30, 1 April 2009 (EDT)

But cruel? I'm a little ashamed of myself. ToastToastand marmite 17:34, 1 April 2009 (EDT)
It was perfect. Z3rotalk 17:35, 1 April 2009 (EDT)

Looks like your kind of thing[edit]

[1]! seventhrib 06:15, 3 April 2009 (EDT)

Heh! But that's darn in t'smoke. A'v not bin ther f'yonks. ToastToastand marmite


I'm agreeing to. He is illogical, and likely not worth my time. Sterilewalkie-talkie 22:24, 3 April 2009 (EDT)

I don't. Philip won't censor our comments, so we might as well throw everything we have at him, just to try to combat the misinformation he spread around. Besides, he could prove helpful in taking down Conservapedia some time. --<choose>

<option>Input The ResistorOutput</option> <option>CoyoteOver 450 pages watched NOT including talk pages</option> <option>The Trickster</option> <option>Acionyx</option> 22:54, 3 April 2009 (EDT)

If we try bombarding him with arguments to counter his misinformation why would he help us take down CP? - User \scriptstyle h/2\hbar 23:45, 3 April 2009 (EDT)
I've got a hunch he doesn't like Conservapedia any more than we do in its current state. Sure, he originally adored it, but he doesn't like the way it's become. --<choose>

<option>Input The ResistorOutput</option> <option>CoyoteOver 450 pages watched NOT including talk pages</option> <option>The Trickster</option> <option>Acionyx</option> 21:24, 10 April 2009 (EDT)


I think it would be funny if you switched to an alternate meaning of "toast" and used scotch.jpg for a bit. Well, the concept amuses me, anyway. Then you can do "skoal", and then use a pic of GWB (toast!), and then back to the burnt bread thing? ħumanUser talk:Human 00:38, 4 April 2009 (EDT)

You know, the wikilinked period is growing on me. The EmperorKneel before Zod!
It would be funnier if that's what UKish people called a full stop... ħumanUser talk:Human 00:53, 4 April 2009 (EDT)

dpl help pleez?[edit]

The archive I just created isn't showing up at RationalWiki:What is going on at ASK? I left a live link to it for inspection, and a commented out copy from wigoCP with an extra term in case that helps. ħumanUser talk:Human 00:30, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Someone else fixed it up, it wasn't really a dpl issue. ħumanUser talk:Human 03:06, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

For you[edit]

for those lonely nights. Ace McWickedThe Liquid Room 03:01, 2 May 2009 (UTC)


Nice catch. ħumanUser talk:Human 05:36, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

Spelling nazi, me. ToastToastand marmite 05:38, 3 May 2009 (UTC)


I wanted to apologize for making the Buddhism comment on the main page talk section a few days ago, obviously not a very rational thing to do, thus forcing you to have to clean up after me. I will try to be more careful in the future! :) Clepper 17:58, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

No worries. If you don't know your way around teh wiki, it's not your fault & we used to dump loads of stuff on main Page Talk that we've learned not to do now. See you've found what the Saloon Bar's for! ToastToastand marmite 18:01, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
I'm trying to learn wiki policy. I've always been a super-lurker of wikis, but never an active participant in one. I'm working up to actually contributing something, heh. Yup, I've found a use for the Saloon Bar, but I hope that if anyone wants me to STFU they say so. I'd totally understand. The 'Some random new user comes in and starts ruining the good clean fun of the Saloon Bar' scenario is one I'm trying to avoid. /sheepish grin :) Clepper 18:16, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
If it goes on much longer, someone'll suggest moving it to "Debate" namespace. ToastToastand marmite 18:21, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
I'm hoping it won't get much longer... whether or not Listener X thinks it's cowardly, I don't see the point of 'I'm right'-ism, and it seems any further debate on the subject would be superfluous to RationalWiki per the debate on Liberal Beliefs, which I seem to remember Listener X himself taking part in. I'll try to stall the section. Hopefully I presented enough common ground for appeasement. Chances are I didn't. Ah well. Clepper 19:19, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

Brainwashing much?[edit]

Strange what crops up when you're rootling round the web. Found this & don't know where to put it, if anywhere:

I was saved June 26th 1967 after some 4 years of pretty heavy personal witnessing to me by several wonderful God loving people that God had put in place at different locations where I would have to be around them. I remember these people after all these years. They were so sincere. They really believed what they were telling me themselves. They would tell me that I was lost, that I was a sinner going to a devil's Hell. Some even cried they were so concerned. They would tell me about God's love and that He was the only Saviour. They would plead with me and pray with me too get saved. These people would not give-up on me. As time drew closer to June 1967, I began to really dislike them even hate them. I would hide from them and dodge them, anything I could to keep away from them. But they would continue to tell me that God gave His only begotten Son too die for me in my place and that He paid the price for my sins. "Jesus loves you" they would say. Then June 5th - 10th 1967, the Israeli Six Day War broke out and man did I come alive. I became so scared & nervous because I had heard over & over in my adult life that the Jews were God's special people. I had started working at Hayes International Corp. in Birmingham in February of 1965. This is where I worked the week leading up to the 26th. On Thursday June 22nd, God gave me a vision. I was driving down the road a suddenly the vision hit. I was in this white cloud of the "Shekinah Glory" for a few seconds and when a came out of it I was saying as fast as I could "I'll go to church, I'll go to church". I was really shaken up. This was the first time God had visited me like this. I was not the same the rest of the day, I just couldn't be normal no matter how hard I tried, I just couldn't shake the feeling I had. Everyday when I returned home (5:00 p.m.), my wife Sue would always have supper ready and on the table. Well this day when got home I told her "We are going to Church Sunday". She had been trying too get me to go for several months. So Sunday morning came and she decided she wasn't going, so I got ready and went.
Faith Tabernacle, a ministry of First Pentecostal Church Of Cullman Alabama.

There's more but I struggled. This message brought to you by: Toastrespondand honey 17:14, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

Feeling threatened[edit]


Okay, I feel better now. Thanks! :)

- Cuckoo 00:02, 29 May 2009 (UTC)


Thanks for deleting the duplicate entry. I'm still getting used to this.Rad McCool 00:00, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

We've all done it & still do, on occasion. This message brought to you by: Toastrespondand honey 00:08, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

Well its 10am and I'm having a gin so it may happen again. I'm placing my trust in you to keep watch. Rad 00:13, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

like (accidentally) logging out & signing as an IP, you mean?Excited.gif This message brought to you by: Toastrespondand honey 00:16, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

ExactlyRad McCool 00:19, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

Anyhoo, I've sysopped you: have a gin on me. This message brought to you by: Toastrespondand honey 00:21, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

For that I'll have two, my hard Kiwi heart thanks you. Rad McCool 00:23, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

As a brit you may understand.....[edit]

I have been trying to figure out who it is that CUR reminds me of and I figured it out while drinking beer in the shower. He reminds me of Adrian Mole. Intelligent, well meaning, well read but rather socially inept. As a brit I thought you would "get it". Ace McWickedDisco Jesus 02:36, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Just thought you might like to know[edit]

I'm done with treatment, with, that is, the proviso that I go through a battery of scans every three months for the next year or so. Just thought you may be interested to know. Hope everything is well with you. Pinto's5150 Talk 06:16, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Congratulations, hope everything goes well for you. Don't miss the scansand tests whatever you do - I've just had to have another op - no 'lady bits' left inside at all now. I'm in an 'observation ward' now - they're keeping my insides under scrutiny full time 'cause they gave me the all clear before and the tests showed recurrence (took them by surprise) which was confirmed so they whipped out the lot. On more drugs than Amy Winehouse & permanently knackered - home this weekend with any luck. This message brought to you by: Toastrespondand honey 09:51, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
Good luck to both of you. Hang in there. ħumanUser talk:Human 02:37, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
Keep strong, chuck. I miss seeing you round the place. I'd pray for you if I thought it'd do any good but as we don't believe in that stuff... I know how difficult it is dealing with the treatment so having a good supportive partner (which I understand you have) to abuse when the shit gets too much really helps. Much love,  Lily Inspirate me. 19:38, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
Cheers each. This message brought to you by: Toastrespondand honey 00:15, 21 June 2009 (UTC)


I sent you are very unimportant email. Ace McWickedi9 01:47, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Replied. This message brought to you by: Toastrespondand honey 00:14, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
Reading.....:) Ace McWickedi9 00:20, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
Sorry I couldn't be more help. It's very much a case by case thing. Keep me posted if you would - it's good to talk. Friends.gif This message brought to you by: Toastrespondand honey 00:23, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

HOT! (well it's not cold)[edit]

I wasn't made for this sort of weather. This message brought to you by: Toastrespondand honey 11:34, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

My edits to WIGO[edit]

Is there a way to talk privately? — Unsigned, by: Zelmerszoetrop / talk / contribs

Email? If you've specified yours in your preferences you can mail me. (Usually reply on the same page as the original comment please - it'll be seen) This message brought to you by: Toastrespondand honey 13:57, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

Philip's making me angry, angry, angry[edit]

Grrrrr..... 03:40, 12 July 2009 (UTC) — Unsigned, by: Sterile / talk / contribs

If you debate him for the laughs, rather than actually trying to convince him of anything, you can usually pull it off without getting angry. See also the poem extract I put on my user-page over at aSK; it might be useful if you are attempting to keep your shirt on. Mjollnir.svgListenerXTalkerX 03:52, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
I usually can, but the information page strains my patience. The rest of ASK I can deal with. Anyway, I will leave it for now.... Sterile echinoid 03:56, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
What really annoys me is the intelligence devoted to the whole thing. They use their brains assiduously in defence if the indefensible. The informattion crap is just an aspect. There's been no improvement in the evidence flr gOD's existence at all. You'd think that it would be a priority. Phil can't see he information inherent in his 'random' matches because he defines information as that which informs me. The fact that others can extract information is immaterial as is the inherent information in any pattern of the matches even if no-one extracts that information. (I haven't read it today - on phone not pc).
Sorry, Listener, I can't see them as anything but dangerous - believe me I've tried, but they terrify me - such superstitious ignorance in the 21st century! This message brought to you by: Toastrespondand honey 19:15, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
I don't know if anyone else noticed, but the "random" matches are quite clearly arranged as a proof of Fermat's Last Theorem, except for one which is slightly out of place. ħumanUser talk:Human 21:05, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
If only Philip realized that!  :) Sterile echinoid 21:15, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

Tapping with a stylus[edit]

I am currently confined to my gsm phone. I have no idea how I managed for months like this, it's slow & painful. Horrid! This message brought to you by: Toastrespondand honey 01:56, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, I know the feeling. I usually just browse on small devices and participate only if pressed. Sterile echinoid 02:53, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
You have my deepest sympathy. Ten fingers on a Dvořák keyboard are a whole lot more fluent, but I've come to accept the limitations of this verschlugginer QWERTY layout. Trying to say anything with a phone keypad would lead to agitated dementia in my case. In other news, I've put up a little essay in my user space. Best regards, Sprocket J Cogswell (talk) 15:12, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

My Most Sincere Apologies[edit]

Dear ‘Toast’

I hope you find it somewhere in your heart to exonerate me of sin. I wish you a thousand felicitations and warm regards, infinite good wishes and hearty remonstrance’s and a well regarded remorseful chest bump. MarcusCicero (talk) 18:35, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Troll This message brought to you by: Toastrespondand honey 19:49, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi 'Toast', I really am sorry that that is the level you hold me to. I will prove to you that I am a changed man. I'm sorry 'Toast', I really am. MarcusCicero (talk) 20:06, 14 July 2009 (UTC)


Next to User:LArron, User:SusanG is at the moment the copyright holder for the largest number of images released specifically under the GFDL. If SusanG were so inclined now would be an excellent opportunity to go ahead and release those as CC-BY-SA. It is of course her choice. It just helps smooth the transition, and it is not really clear how compatible GFDL only material is under CC-BY-SA. tmtoulouse 17:20, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

if some kind person were to amend the licensing on any images for which I am the copyright holder on my behalf I wwould be very grateful. I can't run multiple edts @ the moment, being on a slow phone probably until the end of next week. (It's weird being Susan - like "coming out of the closet") SusanG  ContribsTalk
Weird: I got a "new editor edit block then for making edits too close together. SusanG a new editor? This message brought to you by: Toastrespondand honey 19:44, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
"She", er, "you", um, "someone" desysopped and decratted "her" when "she" "left". I just resysopped "her" in case it might be handy for "her" (whoever "she" is) to be able to edit freely in future. Ya think I should go to "her" talk page and make the grand announcement there? ħumanUser talk:Human 04:09, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
I wouldn't bother - I don't think she'll be back. This message brought to you by: Toastrespondand honey 04:23, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
"Who"? ħumanUser talk:Human 04:26, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
Err ... SusanG? This message brought to you by: Toastrespondand honey 04:30, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
I know not who this "SusanG" you claim to allude to might be. In fact, were I aware of such a "SusanG" in any way, I would be compelled to deny such knowledge, which of course, does not exist. Or any knowledge of missions in which I may or may not have been instructed to compromise "her" existence with extreme prejudice. But fuck it, I sysopped "her" anyway, just in case. "She" seems to be "mostly harmless". ħumanUser talk:Human 05:16, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
"Ouch." This is (not) confusing, except when it is. Sterile echinoid 02:34, 24 July 2009 (UTC)


As "feces" is the US spelling of faeces, I thought his spelling was really shitty. Sorry if you missed the joke. Redchuck.gif ГенгисOur ignorance is God; what we know is science. 19:46, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

I did, sorry! Ashamed.gif This message brought to you by: Toastrespondand honey 19:59, 26 July 2009 (UTC)


"Free reign" is not that wrong any more. Sure, it isn't how the phrase started but it's a fairly common corruption of it today. I hope you aren't going to edit all occurrences of "an apple" to "a napple" soon... !! :) ħumanUser talk:Human 07:49, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

and "an apron" to "a napron"? This message brought to you by: Toastrespondand honey 07:52, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
And "an anecdote" to "a necktie"... ħumanUser talk:Human 07:54, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
I'm just bored, is all. Goin' out in a few minutes. This message brought to you by: Toastrespondand honey 07:55, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
Widespread ignorance doesn't make something correct. We'll be having "free rain" next. And just to pre-empt Human - I don't pay for my rain either. Redchuck.gif ГенгисOur ignorance is God; what we know is science. 10:07, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
I pay for mine, fucker, in too many ways. Everything I own leaks. ħumanUser talk:Human 06:49, 8 August 2009 (UTC)


I just found out that you're a woman. (This is just a random comment letting you know I suck at guessing age, gender, sex, etc). Kix, they're not just for kids~ 21:06, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

I've known for years! I am eating Toast& honeychat 21:19, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
Known what? Eh?! Fuzzy =^_^= 21:23, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

RE: Your link re: cosmetic surgery for girly bits.[edit]

You're probably right about how porn has helped to commodify women's genitals (although there's a longer history of that in terms of things like menstrual products/douches/deodorants, etc...). Have you seen the "Mow the Lawn" commercials? Preposterous. And evil.

I'm reminded of when my ex was reading a Cosmo magazine--the teaser on the cover for one of the articles read something like: "What he's thinking the first time he sees you naked--how to creatively hide your flaws." Flaws? Bullshit. as a man I'll tell you what I'm thinking the first time I see her naked: "Holy shit! She's NAKED. This is going way better than I expected!"

That being said, one of the things I'm really curious about is what easy access to hard-core porn (in my day we were lucky to find a copy of Penthouse or Playboy, never mind what one can now see with a few clicks of the mouse) is doing in terms of the development of male sexuality--what they think is normal (...apparently pubic hair is "gross" now) and what they expect women to do--and how that's going to play out on women's bodies and self-images, and how capitalism will profit from those shifts. Thanks for the link. TheoryOfPractice (talk) 16:50, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

I think that homosexuals of either gender are more likely to dislike pubic hair than hetero men (it gets stuck in the teeth, you know) Nods.gif. I'm not very experienced in the appearance of vulvas, having seen fewer close up than most men probably. Since school I've probably seen fewer than five. I had no exposure to porn at all until the coming of the internet where it's almost obligatory. I suppose that with the (apparent) preoccupation of men with the size of their bits(?), it's only fair that some insecurity ought to be spread to us Laughing.gif. Face it, if there's money to be made out of anything it will be: they've done the face and the bosom and even the backside and obviously had to find somewhere else. I've never particularly liked my body (I'm built like a 12 year old in size and shape) but I wouldn't trade it for Marylin Monroe's. What was the song "My face, I don't mind it/ For I am behind it/ It's those in the front get the jar."
AlterNet's good - try the RSS feed, there's a couple of other things on there that could be of interest. (
Glenn Beck, Rush Limbaugh, Lou Dobbs Enflame Scary Right-Wing Rage;
Christian Cowboy Plots to Bring Christ into Kids' Social Studies Class;
Halting Town Hall Intimidation Is AlterNet's Top Take Action Campaign This Week
etc etc) I am eating Toast& honeychat 17:26, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
I was trying to find the public hair reference. Is there some obscure link to the vanishing hedgehog picture you posted? --BobNot Jim 17:40, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
TOP brought it up (metaphorically that is - I wouldn't acuse him of vomiting pubic hair) I am eating Toast& honeychat 18:03, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
Confession time - I'm afraid I don't like shaved pubes it is too reminiscent of children and doesn't turn me on at all. On the other hand I do have a predilection for gamin types which is probably why I quite like far-Eastern women and Irish pixies. And as for pubes getting stuck in your teeth well there's nothing quite like a freshly washed pussy even for heterosexuals - I can say that I have "given" in this respect far more than I've ever "received" so don't tar all of us straight men with that bush. Redchuck.gif ГенгисOur ignorance is God; what we know is science. 20:11, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

A triumph for Yorkshire[edit]

Just saw this on the BBC news and though you might be interested. Redchuck.gif ГенгисOur ignorance is God; what we know is science. 20:11, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

Not sure. (not watched the vid -bandwidth/speed). I am eating Toast& honeychat 20:15, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
It was also on BBC News24. Redchuck.gif ГенгисOur ignorance is God; what we know is science. 20:24, 13 August 2009 (UTC)


Hello thar, I had a question I was hoping you could answer for me. Have you ever been penetrated? If not, allow me to explain the experience. First he starts talking all smutty, which makes you all wet and drippy. Then he slips himself into teh wetness, and bangs on you as hard as he can for about two minutes. Then you have to go shower with your legs apart while you drip out teh excess dickmilk. After he's gone to sleep, you usually grab your dildo from the third draw down and finish yourself off. This usually soils the bedding and it needs to be washed, you can try rolling over to get out of the wet patch, but the patch is usually so big you'll fall out of bed. 00:16, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

Taking notes, taking notes... (me, not Toast, although that was quite a personal question.) SJ Debaser 00:18, 15 August 2009 (UTC)