RationalWiki's 2019 Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

If everyone seeing this today donates $5, we will meet our goal for 2019.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!

Donations so far: $2900Goal: $6000

User talk:Wolves12345

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

There probably are a lot of fakers but it's hardly bullshit in my opinion if you know yourself you have experienced a traumatic event and you are experiencing visual flashbacks after what happened, which are often rather vivid. Only trouble is that like it says people will pick mundane things to support their wrong idea of them having PTSD, as long as the event is genuinely traumatic and not something mundane then it is fairly rational in my opinion.

On talk pages, please sign your comments using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking on the sign button: SigButt.png on the toolbar above the edit panel. You can also indent successive talk page comments using one more colon (:) for each line. Thank you. —ClickerClock (talk) 23:44, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
Sometimes a disorder is so obvious that self diagnosis is acceptable. Oh someone without a professional diagnosis for anorexia is starving themselves for months because they want to look thinner? Like saying that this person can't self diagnose themselves with an eating disorder is horrible. It's so obvious. Seriously a CSA victim who is a minor, that I know, self diagnosed themselves with PTSD because the doctor won't take them seriously. —ClickerClock (talk) 23:44, 22 October 2017 (UTC)