| There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. If everyone seeing this today donates $5, we will meet our goal for 2019. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with |
User talk:Yossarian/Oxfordian design
From RationalWiki
There's already a Shakespeare authorship article - maybe this could be merged into it, unless you're planning a lengthier treatment of the subject. Ŵêâŝêîôîď
Methinks it is a Weasel 21:01, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
- Oh, I know. This is a send up of the
crazy conspiracy theory ofOxfordianism, rather than a straight article. --
YossieSpring in Fialta 21:05, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
- I'm gonna put it in the fun name space, but I just realised it doesn't indicate that 'cause it's in a subpage right now. :P As for expanding the Shakespeare authorship article...it would probably come to blows if any anti-Stratfordians showed up, and I'd rather not get into a flame war. --
YossieSpring in Fialta 21:08, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
- I'm gonna put it in the fun name space, but I just realised it doesn't indicate that 'cause it's in a subpage right now. :P As for expanding the Shakespeare authorship article...it would probably come to blows if any anti-Stratfordians showed up, and I'd rather not get into a flame war. --