Difference between revisions of "Conservapedia:What is going on at CP?"

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Reverted edits by Wazza (Talk); changed back to last version by PFoster)
Line 28: Line 28:
 
==What is going on?==
 
==What is going on?==
 
{{wigo
 
{{wigo
 +
|197=[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Aschlafly&diff=470170&oldid=470157 "(Obama) is not immune from criticism based on his race"].  What kind of [http://www.conservapedia.com/Nigger criticism] would that be, Andy?
 
|196=Andy shows us how to deal with adversity like a [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=%22Professor%22_Barack_Obama&redirect=no grown up].  You're an inspiration to us all, Andy.
 
|196=Andy shows us how to deal with adversity like a [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=%22Professor%22_Barack_Obama&redirect=no grown up].  You're an inspiration to us all, Andy.
 
|195=Is Terry suggesting what it [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:Music_is_not_neutral&oldid=470017 seems] he's suggesting? Yup, today's [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Essay:Music_is_not_neutral&diff=470071&oldid=470056 younguns' music is evil], in my days we used to...
 
|195=Is Terry suggesting what it [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:Music_is_not_neutral&oldid=470017 seems] he's suggesting? Yup, today's [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Essay:Music_is_not_neutral&diff=470071&oldid=470056 younguns' music is evil], in my days we used to...

Revision as of 05:43, 10 June 2008

Trus me
Conservapedia
Conservlogo late april.png
Introduction
Commentary
In-depth analysis
Fun
Keep up to date with all the insanity at extremist Christian conservative blog Conservapedia right here. This page is for rolling reports of the strange, contradictory or humorous activity at Conservapedia. 

Archives:

There are are other places where we Chronicle Conservapedia Craziness:

  • All-time classics worth preserving for eternity should be removed from this page and entered at Best of Conservapedia. The "up/down" voting system (click on the green and red arrows!) is how we are going to try to pick what should go there.[1]
  • Much of the insanity relates to users foolishly thinking they can add sane material, or, worse yet, argue with the powers that be. They are usually banned quickly, and often in fascinating ways. See Conservapedia:Banwatch for articles of this sort.

Please add new contributions to this list at the top, and try to copy the formatting carefully so the polls work properly. Each new entry gets an ID number one higher than the previous one.

Note to Readers: Due to conservative deceit, some page links from this page to Conservapedia may be broken.

Please do not remove items from the list unless you believe they are legally slanderous or otherwise likely to be detrimental to RW. Any items you think unworthy of inclusion should be discussed on the talk page. Comment out (<!-- WIGO-->) if you think it's really necessary. "one man's boredom is another man's lulz."


Also, can you folks who add to this file try to avoid the first person ("I don't think...") in order to make it smarter?

What is going on?

And in one swell foop, the Pregnancy article was reduced to the intellectual level of "How is babby formed?"

Notes and snark

  1. WARNING: The voting system might be under attack by neoconvicts, koo koo klansmen and/or the International Jewish Conspiracy, so take it with a grain of salt.