There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.
If everyone who saw this today donated $5, we would meet our goal for 2019.
| Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.|
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with !
Conservapedia:Differences with Wikipedia
What is going on?
|Best of Conservapedia|
Differences with Wikipedia
CP in the media
More about CP
Conservapedia claims to differ from Wikipedia in 16 different ways. All 16 of these differences are almost completely nonexistent and/or excruciatingly frivolous. What Aschlafly is trying to do here is justify his personal blog as something important. Also the things Conservapedia claims Wikipedia is guilty of are things that Conservapedia suffers from to a much greater degree.
- 1 - Free Reuse
- 2 - Intellectual
- 3 - Non Commercial
- 4 - Concise
- 5 - No Gossip
- 6 - Requires Authoritative Support
- 7 - No Obscenity
- 8 - Non Neutral
- 9 - No Censorship
- 10 - Allows Original Works
- 11 - Respect users' control over their own talk pages
- 12 - No Distracting templates
- 13 - Loose Regulations
- 14 - Do not drive away experts
- 15 - Only Onsite Offenses Count
- 16 - Professional Names