Conservapedia:Differences with Wikipedia
Revision as of 17:34, 25 August 2007 by DickTurpis (talk | contribs)
Trus me Conservapedia |
Introduction |
Commentary |
In-depth analysis |
Fun |
Conservapedia claims to differ from Wikipedia in 16 different ways. All 16 of these differences are almost completely nonexistent and/or excruciatingly frivolous. What Aschlafly is trying to do here is justify his personal blog as something important. Also the things Conservapedia claims Wikipedia is guilty of are things that Conservapedia suffers from to a much greater degree.
Supposed Differences
- 1 - Free Reuse
- 2 - Intellectual
- 3 - Non Commercial
- 4 - Concise
- 5 - No Gossip
- 6 - Requires Authoritative Support
- 7 - No Obscenity
- 8 - Non Neutral
- 9 - No Censorship
- 10 - Allows Original Works
- 11 - Respect users' control over their own talk pages
- 12 - No Distracting templates
- 13 - Loose Regulations
- 14 - Do not drive away experts
- 15 - Only Onsite Offenses Count
- 16 - Professional Names