Difference between revisions of "Conservapedia:Philip J. Rayment"

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(missing slash)
Line 14: Line 14:
 
Lastly, it has been reported that his followers ‘held all things in common”!!  
 
Lastly, it has been reported that his followers ‘held all things in common”!!  
  
If this isn’t communism, socialism, nationalization of medicine, and a lot of other things beside, than what is it? We must all stop it before it is too late! <ref>http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Barack_Obama&diff=prev&oldid=582024 <ref></blockquote> Philip is a Conservative.  You can't point out that Jesus was close to being a[[Socialist]] can you?
+
If this isn’t communism, socialism, nationalization of medicine, and a lot of other things beside, than what is it? We must all stop it before it is too late! <ref>http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Barack_Obama&diff=prev&oldid=582024 </ref></blockquote> Philip is a Conservative.  You can't point out that Jesus was close to being a[[Socialist]] can you?
  
  

Revision as of 08:17, 9 December 2008

Philip J. Rayment acts as if he has a martyr complex. He believes that “A gentle answer turns away wrath, but a harsh word stirs up anger Proverbs 15:1 (NIV)”. [1] Somehow the anger of Bugler example more examples, and Ed Poor has been stirred up against little Philip and is not turned away. TK is joining in. Big Ed found excuses to block him twice though Philip is loyal to Conservapedia and clearly doesn't deserve a block. Does Philip feel he is being fed to lions?

Philip J. Rayment is too good for Conservapedia. He sometimes unblocks users who have been unfairly blocked. Bugler calls his criticisms of Conservapedia “treasonable”. After mistreatment, Philip J. Rayment is back at Consevapedia doing what he thinks is good work. He forgave those who persecuted him though he may find forgivness more difficult with repeated provocation.

Oh most mighty castle owner, may I please have your esteemed permission to maintain the appearance of one of your subpages when deleting a template used on it? And may I please now back out of your almighty presence on my knees? — Your humble serf, (Philip J. Rayment) [1]

Some RationalWikians feel sorry for Philip.

Bugler, Ed Poor, Aschlafly and others prefer to be harsh in the name of Sweet Jesus. Philip J. Rayment strives to follow some of the better Christian teachings and doesn’t look like a hypocrite. Do the others get angry because Philip J. Rayment shows up their shortcomings?

When Philip blocks

MylesP was blocked just after making the comment below.

Proof of Obama’s secret socialism agenda! Has anyone heard of recent unearthed tapes which reveal Obama’s socialistic agenda? It’s much, much worse than anyone thought. Get this! The guy is nothing more than a communist. He was heard telling a group of people: “If you have two coats, then give one to someone who does not have one”. Incredible! If that isn’t the most radical redistribution programme ever devised, than what is?

But it gets worse. He said: “It’s easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than it is for a rich man to get into Heaven.” When some rich guy protested, Obama said: “Hey, give your money to the campaign fund and follow me.” Then someone asked him what makes a good citizen, and he told the most outrageous story about a guy who finds someone who is sick and pays his hospital bills. If that isn’t socialized medicine, what is?

Lastly, it has been reported that his followers ‘held all things in common”!!

If this isn’t communism, socialism, nationalization of medicine, and a lot of other things beside, than what is it? We must all stop it before it is too late! [2]

Philip is a Conservative. You can't point out that Jesus was close to being aSocialist can you?


Philip J. Rayment believes in creationism with simple childlike faith. In other respects he’s more reasonable than others at Conservapedia. He’s Australian and is thousands of miles from the Bible Belt in the United States. That helps.

Footnotes