Difference between revisions of "Conservapedia:What is going on at CP?"
(→What is going on?: Lenski FTW! (edit conflict)) |
|||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
--> | --> | ||
{{wigo | {{wigo | ||
− | |59= | + | |59=[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia:Lenski_dialog&diff=481047&oldid=477834 Lenski pwns Andy, overuses the word "acolyte"]. Summary of reply to request: We will of course release the data and the raw materials, though if you had bothered to learn to read you would see it is all in the paper. Summary of pwnage: too wonderful to summarize. Read it yourself. Taking bets on how long it takes for "angry outbursts" to make the professor values list. |
|58=How will they fill the gaps by the sysops leaving? Simple, [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=rights&user=Aschlafly&page=User%3AJinxmchue&pattern=&limit=1&offset=0 promote] the worst sort to fill their shoes. '''Note:''' {{cpu|Jinxmchue|He}} still cannot Move, Protect nor Delete individual pages. Though he can [http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:User_rights#Siteadmin_rights lock the database.] | |58=How will they fill the gaps by the sysops leaving? Simple, [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=rights&user=Aschlafly&page=User%3AJinxmchue&pattern=&limit=1&offset=0 promote] the worst sort to fill their shoes. '''Note:''' {{cpu|Jinxmchue|He}} still cannot Move, Protect nor Delete individual pages. Though he can [http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:User_rights#Siteadmin_rights lock the database.] | ||
|57= [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Professor_values&curid=61662&diff=480196&oldid=480171 "A start"] on more Lenski-bashing? | |57= [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Professor_values&curid=61662&diff=480196&oldid=480171 "A start"] on more Lenski-bashing? |
Revision as of 04:03, 24 June 2008
Trus me Conservapedia |
Introduction |
Commentary |
In-depth analysis |
Fun |
Keep up to date with all the insanity at extremist Christian conservative blog Conservapedia right here. This page is for rolling reports of the strange, contradictory or humorous activity at Conservapedia.
Archives:
All-time classics worth preserving for eternity are saved at Best of Conservapedia. The "up/down" voting system (click on the green and red arrows!) is how we pick what should go there.[1]
Add new contributions to the top of this list, and copy the formatting carefully so the polls work properly. Each new entry gets an ID number one higher than the previous one.
Please check older entries to avoid duplication - especially if you see something that's been going on for hours - there's a good chance that someone else has seen it and added it already.
Do not remove items from the list unless you believe they are legally slanderous or otherwise likely to be "detrimental to RationalWiki". Comment out (<!-- WIGO-->) an item if you think it's really an issue. If you think an item is not worthwhile, just vote it down - "one man's boredom is another man's lulz".
What is going on?
- Lenski pwns Andy, overuses the word "acolyte". Summary of reply to request: We will of course release the data and the raw materials, though if you had bothered to learn to read you would see it is all in the paper. Summary of pwnage: too wonderful to summarize. Read it yourself. Taking bets on how long it takes for "angry outbursts" to make the professor values list.
- How will they fill the gaps by the sysops leaving? Simple, promote the worst sort to fill their shoes. Note: He still cannot Move, Protect nor Delete individual pages. Though he can lock the database.
- "A start" on more Lenski-bashing?
- According to cp:condom the condom (which doesn't need to be defined) is not as effective at birth control as fidelity. It would seem that you can't get pregnant if you don't screw around. And it prevents teen pregrancy. Update: In an ironic move, Ed protects the article.
- Learn together reverts the Philip Pullman article to a better version, containing wonderful prose like 'Critics brand his books subversively anti-religious. Defenders say it's all good fun.'
- Due process is for the weak.
- USA and Poland reject Theory of Evolution. United Nations in disarray.
- Now KevinM (who he?) accuses Andy of calling the Holy See liars. Update(s) Just read the whole thing, particularly: "I've already spent far too much time on this issue when more pressing issues need attention. But I looked again at this entry and found it to be 100% correct" from the infallible
PopeAndy. Moer There's no stopping KevinM. DoubleMoer PJR is ice cold. - That deceitful Dawkins allegedly managed to sneak into Expelled by using his real name "Clinton" - that alone was enough to fool everybody into letting in a guy with the last name "Dawkins" who also happened to look like Richard Dawkins.
- Welcome to "CP in a nutshell"!
STATSMSN: Ken, you never addressed my arguments satisfactorily. This dialogue is becoming quite futile.
ANDY: Die, alien scum!
Hey, Andy? MYOB. - Is PJR is planning to go out in a blaze of glory? This reply isn't going to win him many friends amongst the sysops. Good to see PJR standing up for the little people - finally a sysop has realised what their purpose is. How long until he gets slapped back into line, however? The counter starts.... now. Update: Andy is pwned by PJR! Update2: ...and the debate is ended with slappage.
- Ed Poor demonstrates just how clueless he is about other cultures
- Stand aside
Sun Myung MoonBan Ki-moon! SuperWikiConflictResolutionMan to the rescue. - Andy cravenly begs Dan to stay... by rehashing the same old crap about Obama not being a Christian.
- Oh noes, Crocite is gone! Now who will post up all those
blog entriesnews headlines?? - That's all fine and well, Croco. However, when exactly same methods (using biased sources, portraying the statements and actions of single persons as representative for the entire topic, etc.) are used to portray atheism as evil, that's cool?
- Completely lacking any of the intellectual tools needed to participate in a debate, let alone ever win one, Conservative takes the George Aiken response to getting pwned by StatsMsn: declare victory and leave. Update: But what do you do when the debate continues? Easy: Misrepresent results, pretend you're not interested, fling out thinly veiled insults and rely on Andy to take care of things while your opponent does pretty much the opposite of last wordism.
- Instead of writing articles about unimportant crap like the Hoover Dam, CP sysops like Conservative write about the truly pressing issues like homosexual bathhouses and disease! Update: You're welcome, Bugler.
- Upon leaving the polling station, some voters have reported being set upon by a besuited goon. Just another day of wonderful Conservapedian justice. Incidentally: StatsFan has been blocked under the 90/10 rule four times now -- he's breaking the 90/10:4/1 rule! Get 'im, boys! UPDATE: WERD.
- Andy's New Rule: "You're perfectly welcome to talk with me as long as you repeat what I say . . . My new rule is in effect below this line ..."
- Moar! MOAR POWER!Cue maniacal laughter.
- You know the next Great Purge is coming when more folks sign this and this instead of this.
- Beware, Conservative has (hopefully) moved on from mindless forum/blog spamming/trolling and now approaches Viral Marketing (Image backup since Ken has a habit of deleting his link lists every couple of hours). Update: Woosh! Down the memory hole.
- Since Lenski hasn't responded in 48 hours, Andy declares this a refusal to release the data and will now contact the editor-in-chief of the journal PNAS because the journal must have violated its own policies. Update: Andy's own dubious "scientific facts" are called into question. Andy decides he doesn't like all the talk pollution. But wait, there's more: Assfly cranks the irony generator to 11.
- Karajou pwned by PJR. Nice one, Philip!
- Muslims are worse than extremist Christians. Any examples to the contrary are simply exceptions to the rule!
- A nice, convenient list of people who will soon be blocked.
- Oh no, it looks like whatever Ken has is indeed contagious
- Learn Together explains why sysops hand out the day/week long blocks like fricken candy: Those are just the warnings!
- "911, what's your emergency?" "I run a conservative encyclopedia, and I'm reporting a vulgar vandal." "How vulgar?" "He put the word 'penis' into an article." "Is that all?" "He also put a link to 4chan.org into an article." "OK, we'll send a squad car out right away. Thank you for calling."
- Conservapedia's average IQ takes a hit as DanH quits in protest over the attempts to portray Obama as less than fully Christian.
- DinsdaleP: Instead of assuming what Lenski thinks, why not give him time to respond himself? Andy: Okay, I checked my watch, and it's time to STFU! Update: Thou shalt not point out that I painted myself into a corner - or else!
- "The only way this can be settled is if we have access to the genetic sequences of the bacteria colonies so that we can apply CSI techniques and determine if these "potentiated genotypes" originated through blind chance or intelligence"[1]
- Bugler tells PJR that he's not the ombudsman and shouldn't try to be!
- Apparently, PJR does not know Yiddish.
- DanH is really not thrilled about CP's apparent position on the Obama-Muslim issue.
- Congratulations, sysops Joaquín Martínez and Learn together. You finally managed to make Tom snap after weeks of endless sysop power abuse and refusal to discuss editorial direction - with predictable results. Update: Aziraphale gets gunned down for not cheering on the sysops. Uh, okay: Henry engages in damage control and reasons that if people can't complain, they can't be banned for complaining. Update: In the meantime, JM pretends that nothing ever happened.
- Fearless sysop Bohdan asks under fire editor TomMoore to do his dirty work for him. Tom may be brave but he's not stupid. Bohdan is, however, happy to sign the Moreclopedic Pleez Petition, and even suggested Tom pester CPAdmin1 to get their signature.
- Further evidence that the Assfly is a mega-self-contradictory goon.
- PJR, as he is wont to do, says the right thing.
- Ed Poor shows us his level of maturity
- Schlafly shows us the meaning of the word diligence. "I skimmed the paper, and the learned nothing from the pretty pictures. Therefore, clearly I need to skim more data." Also I don't need no biology, bitch. I'm an ENGINEER! Update Andy cops some straight talking from PJR. Update the third: Quoth Assfly "that's totally and absolutely not my transparently obvious motivation for doing this. And I'll block and revert anyone who says otherwise."
- Deborah shows us an easy way to improve our 90/10 stats. (Image backup, just in case a sysop goes on a deletion spree)
- PJR heroically pre-empts the corruption of innocent minds by filthy articles (Screenshot here, 'cause it'll vanish with time).
- Who would've thought you had to follow Wikipedia's guidelines while on Conservapedia? And why is the sysop who thinks so misapplying it? And what is stopping him from deleting its equivalent? (Old, but related: You also have to obey another Wikipedia guideline that doesn't exist on CP.)
- Can you sense a pattern? Update - or not?
- Andy looks for people to sign his letter to Lenski. Six hours later he has three: Himself, some guy named after a largely defensive weapon of gun whose user page is still a redlink, and TomMoore, a known pain in the ass. Update: Up to 20; down to 6
- Ymmotrojam isn't too happy with the "the truth shall set you free" quote because it equates Andy's views with Jesus. How long until he realizes that that's most likely exactly what Andy wanted to say?
- There no need to fear! Signed, the Trusworthy Encyclopedia.
- Conservapedia user Jack Smith dares to suggest that the burden of proof is on the Creationist. Circular reasoning soon follows. UPDATE: And the battle continues! Jack smith, shackled by the bonds of logic and the steel ball of sanity, continues to struggle to survive the onslaught from the divine warriors, defying all known laws of reality with the aid of their god! UPDATE 2: these just might be JackSmith's last words.
- How to edit an article, Joaquín Martínez style: Revert anything that happened since your last edit and continue from there. Rinse, repeat. Oh, and keep ignoring the other editors. Update: A reply! JM claims that Tom didn't "give explanations or wait for a reply"(!!!) More: Learn Together solves the conflict by only allowing JM to edit. Update: Tom is not allowed to ask Andy for input Oh, my: JM and Tom exchange blows... (scroll down to the first horizontal line) once, before JM realizes that he lost and resorts to silly taunts and threats. Full Circle: Tom asks if there are any other objections... and JM replies by silently protecting the article again. Update: Learn Together to the rescue: JM is "a man of the arts" and shouldn't be pestered by lowly editors like you, Tom!
- Sign up now to ensure Andy starts really bothering Prof. Lenski!
- DLerner, is blocked by Karajou for daring to question the quality of Andy's
epistleessay - Finally a bit of balance to Andy's bullshit article about marriage, TomMoore strikes back with Essay:Marry Someone You Love
- Mistake or being a dick? With TerryH, it has become impossible to tell, but either way, one day magically became one month. Update: TerryH confirms that it was dickery: "No accident"
- Wasn't it <sorry> Hitler </sorry> and Stalin who compiled lists of their enemies? Or was it the Mikado "I've got a little list... and you'll surely not be missed ..."?
- No, no, Koward! When he said "Irresponsible liars should not be given admin powers", he didn't mean you, although that's a natural assumptions. Blocking him and Jimmy both for "speaking truth to power" does make the connection pretty good, though.
- The Red Queen's justice: sentence first, then trial!
- So far, the list is surprisingly honest. Update: liberals are infertile sluts.