RationalWiki's 2019 Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

If everyone who saw this today donated $5, we would meet our goal for 2019.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!

Donations so far: $3680Goal: $6000

Difference between revisions of "Conservapedia talk:L.A. Times"

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 13: Line 13:
 
:I love how Andy stopped replying just a bit before the part about the Breast Cancer issue (almost as much as I love the fact that it's in the LA Times article to begin with). His reply-edit is basically just a bunch of soundwords: "not negative", "non sequitur", "you dislike conservatives", "namecalling", "6 times more liberal", "biased", "we state our perspective", etc. --[[User:Sid|Sid]] 13:33, 20 June 2007 (CDT)
 
:I love how Andy stopped replying just a bit before the part about the Breast Cancer issue (almost as much as I love the fact that it's in the LA Times article to begin with). His reply-edit is basically just a bunch of soundwords: "not negative", "non sequitur", "you dislike conservatives", "namecalling", "6 times more liberal", "biased", "we state our perspective", etc. --[[User:Sid|Sid]] 13:33, 20 June 2007 (CDT)
 
::I thought it was only me who noticed that Andy's reply stuttered out before hitting breast cancer.  If anyone want to buff up our entry...[[User:PalMD|--PalMD]][[User_Talk:PalMD|<sup>-yada yada</sup>]] 13:37, 20 June 2007 (CDT)
 
::I thought it was only me who noticed that Andy's reply stuttered out before hitting breast cancer.  If anyone want to buff up our entry...[[User:PalMD|--PalMD]][[User_Talk:PalMD|<sup>-yada yada</sup>]] 13:37, 20 June 2007 (CDT)
 +
:::I thought the last quote there was the most painful part of the article. I know of no one here who truly intends to "destroy" Conservapedia. I really hope SharonS reads Ames' open letter--it was thoughtful and spot-on. In fact, it made me feel bad about the vandalism I'd just committed. (Not for too long, but I felt a twinge.) [[User:Flippin|'''<font color="teal">ʄĹїþþїɲ</font>''']]<sup>[[User_talk:Flippin |<font color="orange">;-)</font>]]</sup> 13:53, 20 June 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 18:53, 20 June 2007

Is Terry really a computer consultant? If so how can he be so computer-illiterate? --Stevo 16:14, 19 June 2007 (CDT)

That's why he's a consultant. MyaR 16:24, 19 June 2007 (CDT)
Ah, silly me! --Stevo 16:36, 19 June 2007 (CDT)
A few months ago he was an auto-industry consultant. --jtltalk 16:37, 19 June 2007 (CDT)
Does that mean he doesn't know anything about cars either? --Kels 16:39, 19 June 2007 (CDT)
Clearly, from his quote there, he knows little about cars, or economics. At least, I think he was commenting about economics. Hard to tell, really. MyaR 16:55, 19 June 2007 (CDT)

This way lies Madness! --Kels 16:38, 19 June 2007 (CDT)

I wasn't mentioooooooooooooned! --Linus(plot evil tech) 22:27, 19 June 2007 (CDT)

Incidentally, did anyone else enjoy Reginod's exchange with Andy about the article here?

I love how Andy stopped replying just a bit before the part about the Breast Cancer issue (almost as much as I love the fact that it's in the LA Times article to begin with). His reply-edit is basically just a bunch of soundwords: "not negative", "non sequitur", "you dislike conservatives", "namecalling", "6 times more liberal", "biased", "we state our perspective", etc. --Sid 13:33, 20 June 2007 (CDT)
I thought it was only me who noticed that Andy's reply stuttered out before hitting breast cancer. If anyone want to buff up our entry...--PalMD-yada yada 13:37, 20 June 2007 (CDT)
I thought the last quote there was the most painful part of the article. I know of no one here who truly intends to "destroy" Conservapedia. I really hope SharonS reads Ames' open letter--it was thoughtful and spot-on. In fact, it made me feel bad about the vandalism I'd just committed. (Not for too long, but I felt a twinge.) ʄĹїþþїɲ;-) 13:53, 20 June 2007 (CDT)