Difference between revisions of "Conservapedia talk:L.A. Times"

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 13: Line 13:
 
:I love how Andy stopped replying just a bit before the part about the Breast Cancer issue (almost as much as I love the fact that it's in the LA Times article to begin with). His reply-edit is basically just a bunch of soundwords: "not negative", "non sequitur", "you dislike conservatives", "namecalling", "6 times more liberal", "biased", "we state our perspective", etc. --[[User:Sid|Sid]] 13:33, 20 June 2007 (CDT)
 
:I love how Andy stopped replying just a bit before the part about the Breast Cancer issue (almost as much as I love the fact that it's in the LA Times article to begin with). His reply-edit is basically just a bunch of soundwords: "not negative", "non sequitur", "you dislike conservatives", "namecalling", "6 times more liberal", "biased", "we state our perspective", etc. --[[User:Sid|Sid]] 13:33, 20 June 2007 (CDT)
 
::I thought it was only me who noticed that Andy's reply stuttered out before hitting breast cancer.  If anyone want to buff up our entry...[[User:PalMD|--PalMD]][[User_Talk:PalMD|<sup>-yada yada</sup>]] 13:37, 20 June 2007 (CDT)
 
::I thought it was only me who noticed that Andy's reply stuttered out before hitting breast cancer.  If anyone want to buff up our entry...[[User:PalMD|--PalMD]][[User_Talk:PalMD|<sup>-yada yada</sup>]] 13:37, 20 June 2007 (CDT)
 +
:::I thought the last quote there was the most painful part of the article. I know of no one here who truly intends to "destroy" Conservapedia. I really hope SharonS reads Ames' open letter--it was thoughtful and spot-on. In fact, it made me feel bad about the vandalism I'd just committed. (Not for too long, but I felt a twinge.) [[User:Flippin|'''<font color="teal">ʄĹїþþїɲ</font>''']]<sup>[[User_talk:Flippin |<font color="orange">;-)</font>]]</sup> 13:53, 20 June 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 18:53, 20 June 2007

Is Terry really a computer consultant? If so how can he be so computer-illiterate? --Stevo 16:14, 19 June 2007 (CDT)

That's why he's a consultant. MyaR 16:24, 19 June 2007 (CDT)
Ah, silly me! --Stevo 16:36, 19 June 2007 (CDT)
A few months ago he was an auto-industry consultant. --jtltalk 16:37, 19 June 2007 (CDT)
Does that mean he doesn't know anything about cars either? --Kels 16:39, 19 June 2007 (CDT)
Clearly, from his quote there, he knows little about cars, or economics. At least, I think he was commenting about economics. Hard to tell, really. MyaR 16:55, 19 June 2007 (CDT)

This way lies Madness! --Kels 16:38, 19 June 2007 (CDT)

I wasn't mentioooooooooooooned! --Linus(plot evil tech) 22:27, 19 June 2007 (CDT)

Incidentally, did anyone else enjoy Reginod's exchange with Andy about the article here?

I love how Andy stopped replying just a bit before the part about the Breast Cancer issue (almost as much as I love the fact that it's in the LA Times article to begin with). His reply-edit is basically just a bunch of soundwords: "not negative", "non sequitur", "you dislike conservatives", "namecalling", "6 times more liberal", "biased", "we state our perspective", etc. --Sid 13:33, 20 June 2007 (CDT)
I thought it was only me who noticed that Andy's reply stuttered out before hitting breast cancer. If anyone want to buff up our entry...--PalMD-yada yada 13:37, 20 June 2007 (CDT)
I thought the last quote there was the most painful part of the article. I know of no one here who truly intends to "destroy" Conservapedia. I really hope SharonS reads Ames' open letter--it was thoughtful and spot-on. In fact, it made me feel bad about the vandalism I'd just committed. (Not for too long, but I felt a twinge.) ʄĹїþþїɲ;-) 13:53, 20 June 2007 (CDT)