Difference between revisions of "RationalWiki:Chicken coop"

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 49: Line 49:
#It's about time someone did something about this. <sup>&mdash; Sincerely, [[User:Neveruse|Neveruse]] / [[User_Talk:Neveruse|Talk]] / [[Special:Block/Neveruse|Block]]</sup> 13:14, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
#It's about time someone did something about this. <sup>&mdash; Sincerely, [[User:Neveruse|Neveruse]] / [[User_Talk:Neveruse|Talk]] / [[Special:Block/Neveruse|Block]]</sup> 13:14, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
#I can vote?  But I thought we were fascist... --{{User:Theemperor/Sig}} 23:49, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
#I can vote?  But I thought we were fascist... --{{User:Theemperor/Sig}} 23:49, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
== Nx ==
Being unable to help himself, Nx [http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=Conservapedia_Talk:What_is_going_on_at_CP%3F&curid=77883&diff=597913&oldid=597909 archived an active thread] to suit his own desires. He then proceeded to edit war over it, insisting that the active thread be archived. <sup>&mdash; Sincerely, [[User:Neveruse|Neveruse]] / [[User_Talk:Neveruse|Talk]] / [[Special:Block/Neveruse|Block]]</sup> 18:28, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
:A thread that was in questionable taste at best, and you were actively trolling in?  Yeah, I support him archiving it, or moving it to your page so you could continue your personal conversation with Boderunt without bothering the rest of the wiki.  --[[User:Kels|Kels]] ([[User talk:Kels|talk]]) 18:42, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
::That you personally find it in poor taste is irrelevant as to whether or not it should be archived. Be intellectually honest. <sup>&mdash; Sincerely, [[User:Neveruse|Neveruse]] / [[User_Talk:Neveruse|Talk]] / [[Special:Block/Neveruse|Block]]</sup> 18:46, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
:::PH+Nx+Kels>Neveruse. {{User:Phantom Hoover/sig}} 18:50, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
::::ignore > abuse, you facist half-wit. <sup>&mdash; Sincerely, [[User:Neveruse|Neveruse]] / [[User_Talk:Neveruse|Talk]] / [[Special:Block/Neveruse|Block]]</sup> 18:57, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
::::(EC) Nonsense, people archive talk page conversations all the time for reasons other than age.  I don't see a single word in the Community Standards limiting it only to inactive conversations. --[[User:Kels|Kels]] ([[User talk:Kels|talk]]) 18:51, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
:::::And like a true cabalist, you read in whatever you please. The thread was still active. It wasn't hurting your wiki. Be honest. <sup>&mdash; Sincerely, [[User:Neveruse|Neveruse]] / [[User_Talk:Neveruse|Talk]] / [[Special:Block/Neveruse|Block]]</sup> 18:54, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
::::::I haven't been anything but.  And I (1) still support archiving the thread and (2) don't give a shit about Cabals. --[[User:Kels|Kels]] ([[User talk:Kels|talk]]) 18:59, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
== Phantom Hoover ==
== Phantom Hoover ==

Revision as of 19:00, 3 June 2010

Archives for this talk page: Archive list (new)

This page is for the reporting of abuse of privileges

Please identify the abused privilege

Sysop privileges

  • Block
  • Delete
  • Hide/Show revisions
  • Rollback
  • Vandal bin
  • Locking pages

Bureaucrat privileges

  • Demote users
  • Promote users
  • Rename users


-- Nx / talk 11:41, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

You don't seem like an asshole. From the looks of things, you do a lot and are just frustrated at the state of the wiki. --Grey (talk) 11:44, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
I side with Nx. Harmonic drug Hoover! 11:48, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
Good, then you agree with all my points above? -- Nx / talk 11:49, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
No, I side with pre-strop Nx. Harmonic drug Hoover! 11:52, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
I agree w/Grey--you're apparently--and quite justifiably--frustrated at some of the nonsense going on with a project that you've worked hard on. But that doesn't mean, as you go on to say, that I "agree with all [your] points above." You want those things to all be fair game? Start a discussion about changing the rules so they won't be. Let the mob speak on them instead of just doing them...P-Foster (talk) 12:51, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
Most of the things done were actually quite sensible. Deleting posts made by spammers (including the cheerleader shite) is of no loss to anyway. Freedom kind of vanishes when people become pissed by a site that is pretty much at the whim of any master cracker who decides to try their hand at vandalising a site that is reluctant to block. --ConcernedresidentAsk me about your mother 18:20, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

I can't believe you are going to allow that autocratic fascist get away with all this. You should be ashamed of yourselves for letting him ruin this website. This website used to be a fun, now it's a boring place full of retarded rules and run by fascists.

HITLER was a fascist - David Gerard (talk) 11:59, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

Proposed punishment

  1. Nx shall be required to find a creationist who seriously asks "But how come there are still monkeys?" and enter into a detailed discussion of the topic with them.
  2. Nx shall be required to retain the curse of the sysop bit.

- David Gerard (talk) 12:12, 18 April 2010 (UTC)


Very much for:

  1. Nutty Roux100x100 anarchy symbol.svg 18:06, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
  2. It's about time someone did something about this. — Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block 13:14, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
  3. I can vote? But I thought we were fascist... --The Emperor Kneel before Zod! 23:49, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Phantom Hoover

Upon entering into a dispute involving other administrators, Phantom Hoover removed my rights and subsequently blocked me to prevent me from restoring an active thread. — Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block 18:30, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Can't we all just get along?

Well? EddyP (talk) 18:35, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

I wish we could, Eddy. If only certain people had the power to ignore instead of abuse. — Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block 18:37, 3 June 2010 (UTC)