Difference between revisions of "RationalWiki:What is going on at ASK?"

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Undo revision 564290 by Nx (Talk) It's legit, you fucking freak...)
m (Reverted edits by Neveruse (Talk) to last version by Nx)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{delete}}
 
 
{{AOTW Navigation}}
 
{{AOTW Navigation}}
 
Add your observations on what is happening at [[A Storehouse of Knowledge]] here.   
 
Add your observations on what is happening at [[A Storehouse of Knowledge]] here.   

Revision as of 17:35, 15 April 2010

Template:AOTW Navigation Add your observations on what is happening at A Storehouse of Knowledge here.

Same rules as WIGO CP. New items at the top, archive when it gets big.

Always be wary of Poe's Law - if something seems too outrageous to be true, it often is. If you see an entry that you think is questionable add {{poe}} to it.

If you decide to join up there, you might want to consider signing the RW Moles Declaration.

Archives

What is going on?

April 2010

upneutraldown
5Not got enough power to sort them nasty evilutionists? Give youself "check user" Bradley
upneutraldown
2Philip channels Andy and adds deceit to the "creation-evolution controversy" "article."

March 2010

upneutraldown
1"Choosing to reject evidence simply because you don't agree with the people highlighting the evidence is not a rational argument." Whereas believing the words of a primitive society's priesthood is?
upneutraldown
-15ASK takes on a decidedly more commercial toneimg.
upneutraldown
6Phillip lays it all on the table: I'll deal with reality when I have some reality to deal with.
upneutraldown
1aSK has made a further departure from the reality-based community.
upneutraldown
-10 Revert and Infinite ban # (Block log); 16:59 . . OscarJ (Talk | contribs) blocked Someone (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of infinite (account creation disabled) (Abusing multiple accounts)
upneutraldown
0PJR: I never said that evilutionists shouldn't give creationists short shrift. PJR has rather a short memory.
upneutraldown
2PJR does some stand-up comedy: "Science should explain what happened without ruling out a particular agency a priori."
upneutraldown
3Following blocks of Teh Terrible Asp, Jeeves, and Editor at CP, PJR announces a new policy at aSK: Insults with "no merit" are to be burned on sight.
upneutraldown
1PJR: Bigoted comments disputing that CMI personnel are scientists are disallowed.
upneutraldown
2Remember, Philip is an honest man. Therefore, this is not lying by omission.
upneutraldown
3March 7: Teh Terrible Asp posts a warning to fellow editors. Two days later, PJR notices it: Revert and one-week block. UPDATE: Jeeves puts up the same text, but only gets three days.
upneutraldown
1PJR: Conclusions that are based on the evolutionary worldview are disallowed in articles. Or, in English, science is verboten.
upneutraldown
0Old-earth creationist view of origins: Trolling. UPDATE: Comment restored by, of all people, OscarJ.
upneutraldown
2PJR: The be-all-end-all of communism was to spread atheism.
upneutraldown
0Oh,look. Daniel1212's given us a lovely new essay semi-coherent blather self-plagiarized dump from Conservapedia Valuable Mainspace Article!
upneutraldown
3The Dream Thought Police, they're coming to arrest me, oh no!

February 2010

upneutraldown
7Is this what they call a teachable moment?
upneutraldown
8No true Scotsman! Extra Value Sure, they've got God and heaven and Jesus and the Bible, but they don't agree with me, therefore they're not really Christian.
upneutraldown
12That's an awful big setup just to say "I'll swallow any sciency-sounding rubbish CMI wants to shovel down my gob."
upneutraldown
8Christianity is the same all over the world!
upneutraldown
5Philip finally gets it! A bit passive-aggressive and childish, but at least he's on the right track.
upneutraldown
5"... the Garden of Eden is not a myth!" sayeth the prophet (Phil).
upneutraldown
16
Two tumbleweeds rolling across the screen, from left to right.

January 2010

upneutraldown
-10My parting comments to Philip and his cesspool of a site [1] .
upneutraldown
5I'm not accusing respected scientists of corruption nor deceit nor sloppiness, except that's totally what I'm doing.
upneutraldown
-11Maybe it really is all over? I mean seriously, click this link. Go ahead, go ahead, click it, I'll wait right here. Oh my <expletive deleted>, see what I mean?
upneutraldown
6PJR: I never did science beyond high school, but I know more about it than every scientist in the world. It's all in the Bible, you know!
upneutraldown
-5LowKey: It is impossible for Jesus to demean any human being. One would think that, being the incarnation of an omnipotent God and all, Jesus could lower anyone's character, status, or reputation.
upneutraldown
-7HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA... ...urrkk!!! By definition, no apparent, perceived or claimed laughter can be valid if it contradicts the scriptural record.
upneutraldown
4A little bit more like Conservapedia every day.
upneutraldown
1Bit of advice Philip, it helps if you give good answers, rather than just regurgitating CMI.
upneutraldown
1Has anyone ever told you you're sexy when you channel TK, Philip?
upneutraldown
1What are the rules for conflict of interest on aSK, anyway?
upneutraldown
4Collaboration, the CP aSK way!
upneutraldown
5 The Great Flood wasn't genocide, you're just hating on god. The only reason someone would attempt to associate it with God would be to imply that He is evil and unjust. Yup!
upneutraldown
2Dishonesty reigns supreme! Surprised?
upneutraldown
4Ken doesn't like people badmouthing his boyfriend.