Difference between revisions of "Talk:Soviet Union"

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 10: Line 10:
  
 
And with that, generations of historians of eastern Europe slowly watch their jaw hit the floor in amazement. [[User:MarcusCicero|MarcusCicero]] ([[User talk:MarcusCicero|talk]]) 11:54, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
 
And with that, generations of historians of eastern Europe slowly watch their jaw hit the floor in amazement. [[User:MarcusCicero|MarcusCicero]] ([[User talk:MarcusCicero|talk]]) 11:54, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
 +
 +
{{DFTT}}

Revision as of 11:59, 27 August 2010

Glory to the motherland! MiddleMan 06:56, 2 July 2007 (CDT)

What does this mean?
Viet Nam - Afghanistan (as in, not quite, but bloody and pointless enough)
Not quite what? Enough for what? WéáśéĺóíďWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 19:35, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

Pointless paragraph

While hardly a parade of sunshine and roses (in fact, they were quite shitty), the USSR was far from the evil baby-eating, warmongering mega-villains the western propaganda portrayed them as. While they lacked the inalienable right of Americans to exploit the poor, the Soviets did see to it that the parts of their population the leaders liked were taken care of. By many standards, life in Russia has actually gotten worse since the fall of the USSR, but this could be because the country is now run by a Bond villain.

And with that, generations of historians of eastern Europe slowly watch their jaw hit the floor in amazement. MarcusCicero (talk) 11:54, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

Troll