Difference between revisions of "Template talk:WIGO title"

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(I mean WHISTLES, not whispers)
Line 5: Line 5:
 
::::Well, the problem with using purely rounded corners here is that it doesn't match the angular corners of Monobook. {{User:Phantom Hoover/sig}} 13:47, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
 
::::Well, the problem with using purely rounded corners here is that it doesn't match the angular corners of Monobook. {{User:Phantom Hoover/sig}} 13:47, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
 
:::::Well, it's not like we can't change the default skin ... --&nbsp;[[User:Nx|<span style="color:teal">'''''Nx'''''</span>]]&nbsp;/&nbsp;[[User talk:Nx|''talk'']] 13:49, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
 
:::::Well, it's not like we can't change the default skin ... --&nbsp;[[User:Nx|<span style="color:teal">'''''Nx'''''</span>]]&nbsp;/&nbsp;[[User talk:Nx|''talk'']] 13:49, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
 +
::::::There is a huge difference between this and the main page, and this actually looks pretty good. I'm just venting. It always strikes me being a novelty. Circles just aren't rational. I'd rather see a gradient any day.<sup>&mdash; Sincerely, [[User:Neveruse|Neveruse]] / [[User_Talk:Neveruse|Talk]] / [[Special:Block/Neveruse|Block]]</sup> 14:18, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:18, 19 May 2010

I'll send every CSS user who stops using rounded corners a dollar. It's becoming the new hammer of web design. — Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block 13:09, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, I kinda agree, but there's a huge difference between our main page and this, and I think this is fine. -- Nx / talk 13:35, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
There is a huge difference. I think they were a great novelty and the mainpage then used them to good novelty effect. But now Opera 10 supports them and I've started seeing them more often, it's looking clunky and annoying. I gather the same is true for people who have been looking at them for a while longer too. However, looking up some of the examples where pro designers have used them on corners or changed the border radius so it's non-uniform, it can look pretty good, and the extension is quite powerful and can produce amazing results when used properly. Okay, so the code is 5 times longer than it needs to be, but that's an under-the-hood issue. Scarlet A.pngpostate 13:41, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
That too. And Internet Explorer is going to support them in version 9. -- Nx / talk 13:45, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
Well, the problem with using purely rounded corners here is that it doesn't match the angular corners of Monobook. Stupid time Phantom Hoover! 13:47, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
Well, it's not like we can't change the default skin ... -- Nx / talk 13:49, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
There is a huge difference between this and the main page, and this actually looks pretty good. I'm just venting. It always strikes me being a novelty. Circles just aren't rational. I'd rather see a gradient any day.— Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block 14:18, 19 May 2010 (UTC)