Difference between revisions of "User:Francine"

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 3: Line 3:
 
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">{{Userboxboxtop|<center>Francine Peters</center>|#000000}}
 
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">{{Userboxboxtop|<center>Francine Peters</center>|#000000}}
 
[[Image:Francine3.jpg]]
 
[[Image:Francine3.jpg]]
 +
In her previous, sinful life, '''Francine Peters''' was a brown-skinned Taoist lesbian with a vaguely Hispanic name who first joined RationalWiki in the summer of 2007 when there were only a handful of humorous articles poking fun at conservatives.  After more than a year on sabbatical, Francine returned to RationalWiki and was overjoyed to connect again with her old friends there. 
  
 +
Unfortunately, it was no longer the same RW.  She uploaded a picture of detainees at Guantanamo Bay for the [[concentration camp]] article, and this was immediately smacked down for being blatant anti-Bush propaganda harmful to the minds of homeschoolers who must use RationalWiki as their sole window on the internet.  Francine went batshit crazy and started burning bridges before she came to them, roaring down the fast lane of the eight-lane superhighway to hell.
 +
 +
By the grace of God, the Holy Spirit convicted her heart and she was brought to the foot of the cross.  Francine accepted the Lord Jesus Christ as her personal Lord and Savior and she began her new life.  The first order of the day was to come out of her filthy lesbian lifestyle and become a white chick.  Now that she has conformed her path to the RationalWiki mission she hopes to make a new start.
 
{{Userboxboxbottom}}</td>
 
{{Userboxboxbottom}}</td>
  

Revision as of 13:22, 2 October 2008

Welcome to my world, <Anonymous User>! Pull up a chair and take a load off.

<td bgcolor="#cccccc">

<center>Francine Peters
</center>

Francine3.jpg In her previous, sinful life, Francine Peters was a brown-skinned Taoist lesbian with a vaguely Hispanic name who first joined RationalWiki in the summer of 2007 when there were only a handful of humorous articles poking fun at conservatives. After more than a year on sabbatical, Francine returned to RationalWiki and was overjoyed to connect again with her old friends there.

Unfortunately, it was no longer the same RW. She uploaded a picture of detainees at Guantanamo Bay for the concentration camp article, and this was immediately smacked down for being blatant anti-Bush propaganda harmful to the minds of homeschoolers who must use RationalWiki as their sole window on the internet. Francine went batshit crazy and started burning bridges before she came to them, roaring down the fast lane of the eight-lane superhighway to hell.

By the grace of God, the Holy Spirit convicted her heart and she was brought to the foot of the cross. Francine accepted the Lord Jesus Christ as her personal Lord and Savior and she began her new life. The first order of the day was to come out of her filthy lesbian lifestyle and become a white chick. Now that she has conformed her path to the RationalWiki mission she hopes to make a new start.

Userboxes
Cross.jpg This user is a Christian
Fem.jpg This user is a woman
Noverlap.png This user holds to the concept of non-overlapping magisteria
Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination
This user is an American
</td><tr> <td bgcolor="#cccccc">
Edits
</td>

<td bgcolor="#cccccc">

New Pages
</td>

</tr><tr>

<td bgcolor="#cccccc">

Chit-chat
</td>


<td bgcolor="#cccccc">

Blog

081001:

Totalitarian Collectivism

The Theocratic State

The Environmentalist Utopia

Classical Liberalism

When people take those little quizzes that plot their politics on a grid, they don't cluster at four points, but end up scattered to hell and gone like my own pattern with an M-14 at 200 yards. The four points are just where the vocal extremists lie:

Thou shalt not covet (0%-100%)

Thou shalt not kill (0%-100%)

  • If you have 0% coveting and 0% killing, you believe the rich should keep their money and we should not fight wars or execute people (Taoist).
  • If you have 100% coveting and 0% killing, you believe the rich should be taxed to help the poor, and we should not fight wars or execute people (Democrat).
  • If you have 0% coveting and 100% killing, you believe the rich should keep their money and we should fight wars and execute people (Republican).
  • If you have 100% coveting and 100% killing, you believe the rich should be taxed to help the poor, and we should fight wars and execute people (Communist China).


</td>

</tr></table>