Difference between revisions of "User talk:Bob M"

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Reverted edits by 86.40.213.45 (Talk) to last version by Nx)
(I think it's good idea: new section)
Line 34: Line 34:
 
:::::I am?  I must have missed that.  Perhaps not the best qualification for the LJ.  On the other hand the mere threat of the LJ's existence seems to have calmed things down.  Or something has.--[[User:Bob_M|Bob]][[User_Talk:Bob_M|<sup>It's windy!</sup>]] 17:46, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
 
:::::I am?  I must have missed that.  Perhaps not the best qualification for the LJ.  On the other hand the mere threat of the LJ's existence seems to have calmed things down.  Or something has.--[[User:Bob_M|Bob]][[User_Talk:Bob_M|<sup>It's windy!</sup>]] 17:46, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
 
::::::What's calmed things down is that the Belfast playwright is annoying RWW instead (and his blog died, arf arf). The only trolls we've got now are those cheerleaders, and even they've gone off the idea. [[User:Totnesmartin|Totnesmartin]] ([[User talk:Totnesmartin|talk]]) 17:51, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
 
::::::What's calmed things down is that the Belfast playwright is annoying RWW instead (and his blog died, arf arf). The only trolls we've got now are those cheerleaders, and even they've gone off the idea. [[User:Totnesmartin|Totnesmartin]] ([[User talk:Totnesmartin|talk]]) 17:51, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
 +
 +
== I think it's good idea ==
 +
 +
It was so funny. I literally laughed so hard that I had to pea in my pants. If I only could reach your intellectual level. But I still think you are far too earnest. We should all enjoy our life more and more. Who the fuck would give shit anyway? Not you. --[[User:Earthland|Earthland]] ([[User talk:Earthland|talk]]) 19:55, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:55, 22 April 2010

Archives for this talk page: <1>, <2>, <3>, <4>, <5>, <6>, <7>, <8>, (new)

Bunny.gif

You have been smitten by a bunny in accordance with the community standards for... no real reason. Feel free to revert this odd edit.

This is where I keep some stuff and play about.

Hello and welcome to my talk page. Not being a smart chap I'll reply on this page to any comments on this page.--Bob_M (talk) 01:59, 28 May 2007 (CDT)

And now you?

Fucking hell.....Acei9 18:57, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

FYI

Just thought that I'd let you know that, seeing as how I graduated from a high school 6 years ago where the majority of student are Latinos and English as a second language students, I recommended your teflpedia site to my old teachers there as a resource for helping them. Turns out, the feedback I have gotten from them is mostly positive, with them grateful for having it as a resource. Anyways, just thought I'd pass that along. Lord of the Goons The official spikey-haired skeptical punk 07:35, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

That's both interesting and gratifying as I get so little actual feedback. I assume it's popular because the site statistics show reasonably positive growth and my pageviews last month were over 40,000. Unfortunately few people take the time to edit or comment which means that I'm rather flying in the dark which makes your feedback most welcome. My (possibly generous) assumption is that most teachers are busy people who only really have time to take and no real time to give even though they might wish to.--BobIt's cold! 07:48, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
(EC) Was that one of our Minneapolis Public Schools? Mjollnir.svgListenerXTalkerX 07:49, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
Yes, it was a charter high school. El Colegio Charter High School to be exact. Punky Your mental puke relief 14:32, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
Hey Bob, thats great man! Acei9 08:12, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
Thanks Ace.--BobIt's cold! 12:08, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
If you want more in-depth analysis of what they thought about teflpedia, I can surely get it for you, Bob. I'd just need to know what you want to know, and then a few weeks to gather said data. Lord of the Goons The official spikey-haired skeptical punk 14:32, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
That would be most interesting - though given that it's a wiki perhaps the most appropriate thing would be to get them to make suggestions or changes there. However, if, for some reason that's not possible then some responses via you would also be most welcome. With regard what what I'd like to know - well for a start it would be interesting to find out what would make people contribute. My guess is lack of time and lack of technical ability. Then, are there any particular things that would like to see covered? Anything that is particularly liked or disliked? Any kind of comments really. Cheers.--BobIt's cold! 15:20, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

That reminds me, I passed the url along to my mother, who is involved with some literacy council thing in N Carolina, and she said she'd pass it along to them. It's probably these folks. ħumanUser talk:Human 10:52, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks Human. Though looking at the site I think they may have a different focus. It's interesting that traffic to the Teflon-Pedia continues to grow. Almost 25% of my bandwidth has been used so far this month. It's the first time that I've had to consider that as a potential problem since the RW visit last year.--BobIt's cold! 11:50, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
No problem. I suspect theree might be some overlap, although, yes, largely different missions. Congrats on the bandwidth problem! ħumanUser talk:Human 12:10, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

LJ Tie

Bob, You and Totnesmartin have tied for 7th place on the LJ. Could you decide between you who is to take the place. yummy Toast&  honey(or marmalade) 00:33, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

Resolved.--BobIt's cold! 10:34, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
You are a gentleman Bob. - π 10:36, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
He certainly is. Totnesmartin (talk) 10:38, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
He's also back in because Genghis has dropped out. Totnesmartin (talk) 17:41, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
I am? I must have missed that. Perhaps not the best qualification for the LJ. On the other hand the mere threat of the LJ's existence seems to have calmed things down. Or something has.--BobIt's windy! 17:46, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
What's calmed things down is that the Belfast playwright is annoying RWW instead (and his blog died, arf arf). The only trolls we've got now are those cheerleaders, and even they've gone off the idea. Totnesmartin (talk) 17:51, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

I think it's good idea

It was so funny. I literally laughed so hard that I had to pea in my pants. If I only could reach your intellectual level. But I still think you are far too earnest. We should all enjoy our life more and more. Who the fuck would give shit anyway? Not you. --Earthland (talk) 19:55, 22 April 2010 (UTC)