Difference between revisions of "User talk:Human"

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(its just too bad)
(its just too bad)
Line 92: Line 92:
 
Oh dear god.  A Pinto copycat is arguing with a Human copycat over who runs the Bohdan sock (which, incidentally, is the Pinto copycat).  My brain's not melting, it's just liquefying.  [[User:Thunderkatz|Thunderkatz]]<sup>[[User talk:Thunderkatz|Ho!]]</sup> 10:24, 3 February 2008 (EST)
 
Oh dear god.  A Pinto copycat is arguing with a Human copycat over who runs the Bohdan sock (which, incidentally, is the Pinto copycat).  My brain's not melting, it's just liquefying.  [[User:Thunderkatz|Thunderkatz]]<sup>[[User talk:Thunderkatz|Ho!]]</sup> 10:24, 3 February 2008 (EST)
 
:Now we have to figure out which sock is run by you... [[User:Locke|Locke]] 20:22, 3 February 2008 (EST)
 
:Now we have to figure out which sock is run by you... [[User:Locke|Locke]] 20:22, 3 February 2008 (EST)
 +
::Me.  [[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]]

Revision as of 01:37, 4 February 2008

This usely to cher is suspas appepets abusiveat in officpupry, and harently uted of socksed pupcial mopetb votes.

Archives for this talk page: Archive list (new)
See the history of vandalism to this article

Wingnut.jpg
This user may experience moments of lucidity,
but don't count on it.

Hey goobers, it's my talk page!

Just so's you all know, I have a distinct preference for continuing conversations on the talk page they start on. Otherwise my aging brain hurts! (ie, no table tennis conversations, please)

BrainMop.png As a confirmed mustard jar for taking on this job as a Sysop on RationalWiki: I pledge to only block users if they ask for it, or insert unfunny vandalism.
I furthermore pledge that if I indulge in secret private conversations about you, we will make a formal report to the mob. Is that all?
If you impugn my motives without warrant, or challenge my "AUTHORITY", er, there is nothing I can or will do.
Anyone is welcome to nominate editors for demotion to sysop, and discuss the nominations here.
Sysops can summarize the nominations here
Free world to hold party in -268 days!

A nice break from bigotry

Hey, Human, I found a good site: Religious Tolerance.

Not sharing for any real reason, though I find the site refreshing after reading Conservapedia, and even sometimes after RationalWiki. --Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 15:59, 28 January 2008 (EST)

Hehe, cool, thanks. Yeah, CP gots their militant YECiots, and we gots our share of militant atheists... Personally I like a one hour show that's on Air America Sat from 10-11 and Sundays from 7-8 EST, State of Belief with the Rev. Dr. C. Welton Gaddy. He's hilarious, and obviously religious but very ecumenical. humanUser talk:Human 18:46, 28 January 2008 (EST)

UR

VERY EFISHUNT ADMIN. HEREZ A COOKIE FUR U. ROTFLMAOKTHXBAI
Scotch.jpg
Gee, thanks abunchofnumbers! humanUser talk:Human 18:00, 30 January 2008 (EST)
I concur with the above sentiment. Regrettably, I'm all out of cookies. :-( --AKjeldsenGodspeed! 19:14, 30 January 2008 (EST)
You can enable your cookies on your toolbar. Also, socks are nice.--PalMD-Did that sound a little harsh? 19:16, 30 January 2008 (EST)
I would, but as you may recall, User:Interpreted took all my cookies, and then nuked my user page. --AKjeldsenGodspeed! 19:23, 30 January 2008 (EST)
The cookies are yummy and appreciated, but has anyone brought Scotch??? Ah, there it is! humanUser talk:Human 19:32, 30 January 2008 (EST)
Cookie half.jpg For demonstrating exemplary goatery in the line of duty, NamuH
has awarded you a used pre-owned! and slightly stale cookie.
Ewwwwwww.
Cockroaches ate half of it.

Cookies from socks are so much better than imaginary cookies from imaginary people. -- yteicos enamuħ   19:45, 30 January 2008 (EST)

Thanks everyone! And, abunchofnumbers, I forgot to blush at what I hope was a compliment (Mussolini was supposedly a "VERY EFISHUNT ADMIN." too...) humanUser talk:Human 19:56, 30 January 2008 (EST)

vast RW conspiracy

Were you seriously offended? Its not like I said "libtard". (that one never gets old!) Locke 23:35, 30 January 2008 (EST)

What? when? where? how? ...link? humanUser talk:Human 23:38, 30 January 2008 (EST)
What are you talking about? Why did you come say "for that you deserve a block"? Was it because I said you were part of a rat-wiki conspiracy? Locke 23:39, 30 January 2008 (EST)
What are you talking about? I was playing cat and mouse with Bohdan, what were you doing, pinto bean guy?
I am not the pinto bean guy. Locke 23:43, 30 January 2008 (EST)
Well, are you impersonating him? That is naughty and punishable by deaf! humanUser talk:Human 23:50, 30 January 2008 (EST)
I'm the Pinto Bean Guy. ^He's Bohdan. Pinto's5150 Talk 23:45, 30 January 2008 (EST)
No, I am not him either. Locke 23:45, 30 January 2008 (EST)
Ok, sure, next you're going to say that you're User:AKjeldsen. Pinto's5150 Talk 23:48, 30 January 2008 (EST)
Or me! So who was that stranger!?!?!?!!?! humanUser talk:Human 23:50, 30 January 2008 (EST)
  • So you didn't block me for calling you a rat? Thats good. Can I get away with calling you a libtard? Locke 23:52, 30 January 2008 (EST)
  • Libtard. user talk:Bohdan 23:53, 30 January 2008 (EST)
You can call me anything you want, you asteriskatroid. It won't make you less of an asteriskatroid. You askeriskatroid, you. PS, I might block you for any idiotic random reason I come up with, as long as it is a very short block, and we aren't edit warring over an article! 23:56, 30 January 2008 (EST)

HUMAN IS A LIBTARD! Locke 00:01, 31 January 2008 (EST)

oooooohhh! I'm so scared! humanUser talk:Human 00:06, 31 January 2008 (EST)

Wait, why was I just promoted? Pinto's5150 Talk 00:09, 31 January 2008 (EST)

I dunno... why? Some dumbass made you a burocrat! So I fixed that. No, sorry, that was the "locke" user impersonating you. Who can tell what's what when Mr. Bohdan in in the house? humanUser talk:Human 00:13, 31 January 2008 (EST)
I'm so confused now. Pinto's5150 Talk 00:15, 31 January 2008 (EST)
You want to know why you were "promoted"? Read the header for this discussion. user talk:Bohdan 00:18, 31 January 2008 (EST)
Wait, your head is spinning? Surely not from the last few minutes of constructive editing of this ever-growing, educational web site?!?!?!?! humanUser talk:Human 00:19, 31 January 2008 (EST)

I was the first, you know. --Stabbythe Misanthrope, essayist 06:49, 31 January 2008 (EST)

So, did anyone check to see if we left any permanent damage to the wiki after last night's chaos? humanUser talk:Human 11:33, 31 January 2008 (EST)

Templates

Heh! Given you something to do haven't I?! SusanPurrrrrrr 17:50, 31 January 2008 (EST)

Well, someone is now going to have to enter useful info for all those templates... and not having the empty params in place makes it eleven times harder </whine> And I still question its usefulness. Oh, and can you please make helpnav list things alphabetically? humanUser talk:Human 17:53, 31 January 2008 (EST)

Usefulness? What sort of criterion is that for including anything? The alpha thing - I've had an idea - back in a while. SusanPurrrrrrr 18:25, 31 January 2008 (EST)

its just too bad

I am amazed at what this site has become. Quality vandalism doesn't last ten seconds before a hotheaded admin reverts it, then issues a block. Its almost like they think somebody actually cares. Locke 22:38, 2 February 2008 (EST)

(You're blocked, so I can answer) Are you calling Bohdan's vandalism quality? Because most of it is repeating the same joke about x being a sockpuppet of y. Funny the first couple of times, kinda lame by the 314th. ThunderkatzHo! 22:57, 2 February 2008 (EST)
Chill out. Nobody cares about this wiki. And yes, the vandalism was quality. But the sock notices, those were legitimate. Locke 23:06, 2 February 2008 (EST)
No, just tiresome and booooorrring. Sock announcements are so "last November". humanUser talk:Human 23:18, 2 February 2008 (EST)
Your comments didn't make sense until I remembered that Locke = Pintobean and Pintobean = Bohdan 2.0. And I'll fight you if you accuse me of being hotheaded again. ThunderkatzHo! 23:29, 2 February 2008 (EST)
I think my brain just melted.--PalMD-Did that sound a little harsh? 23:34, 2 February 2008 (EST)
Brains don't melt. Locke 23:50, 2 February 2008 (EST)
No, Locke = Bohdan; and PintoBean signs as Locke. So Locke should blocked/renamed as a cheap doppelganger attempt. Doc, it's not that hard to keep track of! We are all sockpuppets, after all, of Helena Bonham Carter! humanUser talk:Human 23:46, 2 February 2008 (EST)
Almost. You're all actually brains in jars in my lab. I keep the jar juice just the right temperature to avoid any melting unpleasantness. --Helena Bonham Carter 00:01, 3 February 2008 (EST)
Why should Locke be blocked/renamed? How about making Pintobean sign with what his account is? Locke 23:50, 2 February 2008 (EST)
Brains don't melt, eh? Who's the doctor here?? Next you're gonna tell me that UFO's aren't real.--PalMD-Did that sound a little harsh? 23:52, 2 February 2008 (EST)
Whens the last time you saw a brain melt? Locke 23:54, 2 February 2008 (EST)
  • I am not Locke. Are you getting paranoid Human? user talk:Bohdan 23:53, 2 February 2008 (EST)
lol Locke 23:54, 2 February 2008 (EST)
Not at all (are we all colon-impaired tonight?). But, if there was any housekeeping to be done, "Locke" should be renamed and the pinto bean guy should be renamed Locka, as he has bin signing for oh-so-long. It just didn't occur to him that some scum sucking slug would try to doppelgang him. humanUser talk:Human 23:57, 2 February 2008 (EST)
Are you saying that you have been doppleganging him? Shame! Locke 23:58, 2 February 2008 (EST)
Are you sure Locke is Bohdan? Because I always assumed that Locke was run by some random, unoriginal moron. -- yteicos enamuħ   00:05, 3 February 2008 (EST)
Are you saying I am run by Radioactive afikomen? Locke 00:21, 3 February 2008 (EST)
Silly. Radioactive afikomen is a well-organized, highly original moron. So he clearly cannot be Bohdan. -- yteicos enamuħ   00:26, 3 February 2008 (EST)
Ames isn't all that original, but is he a moron? He is a lawyer, does that count? Locke 00:29, 3 February 2008 (EST)
Nah. Lawyers fall under "bastards and scumbags". Being a moron costs extra. -- yteicos enamuħ   00:32, 3 February 2008 (EST)
Maybe Linus? PalMD? Wait I know... TMTOULOUSE! Locke 00:37, 3 February 2008 (EST)
Maybe Elassint? I mean, Locke is sort of an aggressive loony, and that's Elassint all over. -- yteicos enamuħ   03:04, 3 February 2008 (EST)
But was he a moron? Locke 20:24, 3 February 2008 (EST)

Oh dear god. A Pinto copycat is arguing with a Human copycat over who runs the Bohdan sock (which, incidentally, is the Pinto copycat). My brain's not melting, it's just liquefying. ThunderkatzHo! 10:24, 3 February 2008 (EST)

Now we have to figure out which sock is run by you... Locke 20:22, 3 February 2008 (EST)
Me. Bohdan