Difference between revisions of "User talk:AKjeldsen"

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Your taste in books is lousy)
Line 122: Line 122:
 
[[Image:Talk-AKjeldsen ad.jpg|center]]
 
[[Image:Talk-AKjeldsen ad.jpg|center]]
 
This probably confirms what SHahB has been saying all along.  {{User:Radioactive afikomen/sig}} 01:52, 12 June 2008 (EDT)
 
This probably confirms what SHahB has been saying all along.  {{User:Radioactive afikomen/sig}} 01:52, 12 June 2008 (EDT)
 +
:Your louse in taste is booksy. Well dog my cats, just goes to how ya, whodthunkit, hard tellin', not knowin', eh? '''[[user:human|<font color="#DD00DD" face="comic sans ms"><big>ħ</big>uman</font>]]'''{{User:Human/sigtalk}} 02:27, 12 June 2008 (EDT)

Revision as of 06:27, 12 June 2008

Archives for this talk page: <1>, <2>, <3>, <4>, <5>, <6>, (new)

Despite having had Sysopship thrust upon me against my express wishes, I hereby pledge to do a moderately barely acceptable job, as it would appear that I have little say in the matter anyway. Also, since I, apparently unlike some of my more touchy-feely colleagues, consider Sysops appointed representatives of the RationalWiki community as a whole, I furthermore pledge that if you impugn my motives without warrant, or challenge my "AUTHORATIE", and by extention that of the community as such, I both can and will ban you so hard that the relativistic effects will be sufficient to kick you into next week. Goatspeed!


Your castle is on fire

Have you looked at your user page? I think you must have left a tag unclosed. I would've fixed it, but I don't know how.</concern> <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!</font>NewWorldEnterprise 18:27, 7 June 2008 (EDT)

Looks fine to me. What does it look like to you? --AKjeldsenPotential fundamentalist! 18:31, 7 June 2008 (EDT)
It has those creepy "shrunken buttons" at the top. And the navigation bar is at the bottom of the page. I hear Stephen King is using it as the monster in his next short story. <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!</font>NewWorldEnterprise 18:35, 7 June 2008 (EDT)
Hmm, yes - I think I see the problem now. The problem probably is that you're using IE. I suggest you solve this by switching to a browser that doesn't suck. --AKjeldsenPotential fundamentalist! 18:38, 7 June 2008 (EDT)
I'm using firefox. Your buttons are pwned.
Deal with it :P <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!</font>NewWorldEnterprise 18:44, 7 June 2008 (EDT)
*grumbles* Right, right. --AKjeldsenPotential fundamentalist! 18:46, 7 June 2008 (EDT)
Verily it doth suck, what hast thou done, Dane? SusanG  ContribsTalk 18:49, 7 June 2008 (EDT)
Bohdan left a little <div> gift that I think messed things up a bit. Should be fixed now. --AKjeldsenPotential fundamentalist! 18:52, 7 June 2008 (EDT)

FCK

You don't support FCK? Are you a moron or something? SHahB 20:02, 7 June 2008 (EDT)

...And your motive for the random userbox wandalism finally becomes clear. I should have known, really :) <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!</font>NewWorldEnterprise 20:04, 7 June 2008 (EDT)
Known what? That Copenhagen dominates, and only a fool would cheer for anyone else? SHahB 20:07, 7 June 2008 (EDT)

Have a look here. SHahB 20:12, 7 June 2008 (EDT)

I really don't know why you do this, Shabby. <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!</font>NewWorldEnterprise 20:20, 7 June 2008 (EDT)
Plus, you haven't changed your name for a while. I can't wait to see what you've got in store for us! <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!</font>NewWorldEnterprise 20:21, 7 June 2008 (EDT)
JahJD would work well. ħumanUser talk:Human 21:22, 7 June 2008 (EDT)
I don't know about that. I was expecting something more epic. <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!</font>NewWorldEnterprise 21:30, 7 June 2008 (EDT)
For the record, I neither support nor oppose FCK, as I do not, indeed, give much of a damn about football at all. But if I did give one, I would probably support FCK. --AKjeldsenPotential fundamentalist! 04:26, 8 June 2008 (EDT)
And you call yourself European... lol. SHahB 22:28, 8 June 2008 (EDT)
Yes, but not necessarily a good one. --AKjeldsenPotential fundamentalist! 07:43, 9 June 2008 (EDT)

Bohdan, did you have to put up a header that reads dangerously close to a swear word? Shame, you naughty boy! Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 22:30, 8 June 2008 (EDT)

Fickle is a dirty word? ħumanUser talk:Human 23:51, 8 June 2008 (EDT)
Man! How can you use such fowl language? Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 00:08, 9 June 2008 (EDT)

Priceless art?? Come closer so I may sting you

He prolly only grabbed it from somewhere. <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!</font>NewWorldEnterprise 19:28, 8 June 2008 (EDT)

That is undoubtedly true, but that does not diminish the pricelessness of this work. Indeed, it only increases its artistic merits by highlighting the transient and fluid post-constructionist nature of internet art and culture. [/smokepipe] --AKjeldsenPotential fundamentalist! 19:32, 8 June 2008 (EDT)
If I understand you correctly, you're arguing that its value lies in how easily it was ripped off by Grawp? Are you quite sure?? <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!</font>NewWorldEnterprise 19:36, 8 June 2008 (EDT)
Er. More or less. --AKjeldsenPotential fundamentalist! 19:45, 8 June 2008 (EDT)
So are we going to put this priceless treasure on display somewhere in our Museum of Unnatural History? ħumanUser talk:Human 21:01, 8 June 2008 (EDT)
Nay! If we don't know where it comes from it could easily be copyrighted! Or worse -- quote mining! <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!</font>NewWorldEnterprise 21:08, 8 June 2008 (EDT)
Or ideally, both! ħumanUser talk:Human 21:42, 8 June 2008 (EDT)

If you would be so kind...

You seem to be the in-house philosopher here. What is this philosophical critique of Ayn Rand's objectivism even saying? I tried reading it, and past the first eighth I couldn't understand it. If you would be so kind as to paraphrase it in layperson's terms for me? Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 22:28, 8 June 2008 (EDT)

First, Ayn Rand's definition of "rational" was "what I [she] think[s]". Contrast that with the hurly-burly on this site... ħumanUser talk:Human 00:36, 9 June 2008 (EDT)
Uh, is that your critique of Rand, or the critique I asked for help with? Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 00:42, 9 June 2008 (EDT)
It was my response after reading the first two paragraphs. I do intend to struggle forth more fully, do not feel slighted by my quick response. ħumanUser talk:Human 01:08, 9 June 2008 (EDT)
Ah, okay. Sorry if I went off a bit there. And thanks. Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 01:14, 9 June 2008 (EDT)
No offense, I didn't really address your question. But I do have that window open to struggle through! ħumanUser talk:Human 01:18, 9 June 2008 (EDT)
I don't know much about either Rand or Jacob Fries, so I don't know how much more sense I can make of it. But I'll take a look at it... (*glances at rapidly onrushing deadlines*) ...in a few days. --AKjeldsenPotential fundamentalist! 07:59, 9 June 2008 (EDT)
Long ago, on a website far far away... [1] Think of everything2 as "a website where anyone can write anything, everyone votes (WIGO style) on articles and is rewarded for doing so and the admins occasionally delete the junk." A couple of people clashed with an "ayndroid" who had the annoying habit of posting Rand quotes without any original material. --Shagie 20:10, 10 June 2008 (EDT)

Football

You really don't care? Is that some liberal thing? Or are you some kind of pervert? --SHahB 13:24, 9 June 2008 (EDT)

Not to speak for AKjeldsen, but I don't care about any sport. Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 14:25, 9 June 2008 (EDT)
Hear hear. <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!</font>NewWorldEnterprise 14:32, 9 June 2008 (EDT)
Sport are for doing not for watching/supporting get out there and sport, Sport! SusanG  ContribsTalk 05:39, 10 June 2008 (EDT)
Sometimes it's fun to watch ;) ħumanUser talk:Human 14:11, 10 June 2008 (EDT)

Euro

Remember when you started spreading your propaganda about the Denmark and the Euro? [2]. Leading bankers (not politicians) have said this is a bad idea. But what do they know about the economy? Its not like they're SCIENTISTS or anything. SHahB 22:10, 9 June 2008 (EDT)

The danish currency has hearts on it. That can't be good for the economy. Wazza (Not Wazzock, Wazza)Approach the Presence 22:15, 9 June 2008 (EDT)
Indeed. Because the modern Danish Empire is built upon love. Just not of those inferior Faroese. Or the Greenlanders. SHahB 22:18, 9 June 2008 (EDT)
You associate love with money? Whatever happened the ideals of Free Love? Isn't Denmark supposed to be chock full of hippies, you filthy corporationist? Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 22:31, 9 June 2008 (EDT)
I can't help but wonder 1) who these "prominent bankers" are, and 2) why they are not mentioned by name in the article. Is the journalist too lazy to research such a simple fact? The "Lars Lokke Rasmussen" on the other hand is hilarious. --AKjeldsenPotential fundamentalist! 05:03, 10 June 2008 (EDT)
What are you implying? SHahB 18:18, 10 June 2008 (EDT)
I'm not implying anything, I'm saying that this article is, at best, useless. It tells us nothing. It is not journalism, it is gossip. --AKjeldsenPotential fundamentalist! 18:34, 10 June 2008 (EDT)
Your hatred of Icelanders is far too obvious. I should be discussing this with a Dane who isn't a chauvinist. SHahB 18:36, 10 June 2008 (EDT)
I have nothing against Icelanders. As long as they share my unquestioning love for the Euro, of course. I don't know whether this particular Icelander hates the Euro or whether he's just lazy, but I'm watching him. Carefully. --AKjeldsenPotential fundamentalist! 18:40, 10 June 2008 (EDT)
Ahhh-haaaa! I have gotten you to admit your bias. SHahB 18:41, 10 June 2008 (EDT)
There is no bias here, I am simply neutral to the facts. If one of those facts happens to be that anyone not unquestionably loving the Euro is a dark-hearted, hate-filled reprobate with no hope of redemption - well, I can't help that, can I? --AKjeldsenPotential fundamentalist! 18:45, 10 June 2008 (EDT)

Miss Headscarf 2008

So, were you disappointed with the results? I was cheering for the runner-up. SHahB 18:07, 10 June 2008 (EDT)

No, I think the best scarf won, really. I like blue. --AKjeldsenPotential fundamentalist! 18:13, 10 June 2008 (EDT)
Figures. Blue is the color of sadness. Much like... your face. SHahB 18:17, 10 June 2008 (EDT)
My face is a colour of sadness? That doesn't even make sense. --AKjeldsenPotential fundamentalist! 18:28, 10 June 2008 (EDT)
No, no, no. Your face represents sadness, like the color blue. SHahB 18:33, 10 June 2008 (EDT)
Actually, I think about the only thing my face represents right now is moderate unshavenness. --AKjeldsenPotential fundamentalist! 18:35, 10 June 2008 (EDT)
Yes. And thus, sadness. SHahB 18:36, 10 June 2008 (EDT)
You don't even know what my face looks like. --AKjeldsenPotential fundamentalist! 18:41, 10 June 2008 (EDT)
Sure I do. SHahB 18:43, 10 June 2008 (EDT)
I'm the Prime Minister? Hey, I didn't even know that! Excuse me, I need to go make a few phone calls. --AKjeldsenPotential fundamentalist! 18:46, 10 June 2008 (EDT)
No, fool. You look like him. SHahB 18:48, 10 June 2008 (EDT)
Do not. --AKjeldsenPotential fundamentalist! 18:49, 10 June 2008 (EDT)
Do to. SHahB 18:49, 10 June 2008 (EDT)
That guy looks like a caveman. I don't. --AKjeldsenPotential fundamentalist! 18:51, 10 June 2008 (EDT)
Then you must look like Seebach. SHahB 18:52, 10 June 2008 (EDT)
I'm sorry, I don't look like a miserable, failed pop musician, either. --AKjeldsenPotential fundamentalist! 19:03, 10 June 2008 (EDT)
:D Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 09:05, 11 June 2008 (EDT)

Looking at that header sets off the "sexism" alarm bells in my head for some reason. Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 09:05, 11 June 2008 (EDT)

[3]. --AKjeldsenPotential fundamentalist! 09:11, 11 June 2008 (EDT)
Hm. It seems I was right. Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 10:09, 11 June 2008 (EDT)
Not at all. It's to highlight the participants and cast them in a positive light, as well as to slightly satirize a current political debate. No sexism involved at all. --AKjeldsenPotential fundamentalist! 10:35, 11 June 2008 (EDT)
His concerns are valid. You are a theist, so therefore you must be a sexist. Anything you talk about needs to be scrutinized for sexism, religious bigotry, hatred of the environment, or pro-Danish nonsense. SHahB 12:32, 11 June 2008 (EDT)

I have replied to your very important message with a childish joke

I have replied to your very important message with a childish joke. <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!</font>NewWorldEnterprise 18:20, 10 June 2008 (EDT)

Congratulations!

Congratulations on finishing your project! ...Whatever it was. Come to think of it, you haven't been very forthcoming about what your project is. Is it a secret? C'mon, you can tell us! Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 09:03, 11 June 2008 (EDT)

Nothing particuarly interesting, just writing abstracts for a bunch of historical articles. --AKjeldsenPotential fundamentalist! 09:11, 11 June 2008 (EDT)
Yah, but forty-four of them? Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 10:10, 11 June 2008 (EDT)
Thirty, actually, but about half of them are double the length of the others, so they count as two in my mind. But yeah, that's your average-size batch. --AKjeldsenPotential fundamentalist! 10:33, 11 June 2008 (EDT)
Remind me never to be a Danish historian. Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 10:40, 11 June 2008 (EDT)
Someone's got to do it, I guess. Though as a matter of fact, the company I work for is located in California, so I don't think you're safe anywhere in the world. --AKjeldsenPotential fundamentalist! 10:58, 11 June 2008 (EDT)
So the Danish Empire is expanding into the USA? SHahB 12:33, 11 June 2008 (EDT)
I saw someone wearing imperialist clogs in Manhattan on teh tellytube news the other day. They're everywhere! ħumanUser talk:Human 14:49, 11 June 2008 (EDT)
It's globalization, Henry! The wave of the future! All the cool countries are doing it! --AKjeldsenPotential fundamentalist! 17:43, 11 June 2008 (EDT)
Thank you for logging on at such a convenient time. Are you, Andrew, a supporter of globalization. SHahB 17:48, 11 June 2008 (EDT)
All the way, Hippolytus. It is the only path forward. --AKjeldsenPotential fundamentalist! 17:50, 11 June 2008 (EDT)
But Aadu, anarchists oppose globalization. SHahB 17:54, 11 June 2008 (EDT)
Good thing I'm not an anarchist, then. --AKjeldsenPotential fundamentalist! 18:19, 11 June 2008 (EDT)
Thanks for getting back to me. Au contraire, you are clearly an anarchist wanna-be. It's every liberal dream to be an anarchist. That and to commit genocide of conservatives. SHahB 18:24, 11 June 2008 (EDT)
How about globalizing anarchy? That'd get on their clogs! Tammy Seabuck for President! ħumanUser talk:Human 21:27, 11 June 2008 (EDT)

Your taste in books is lousy

Talk-AKjeldsen ad.jpg

This probably confirms what SHahB has been saying all along. Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 01:52, 12 June 2008 (EDT)

Your louse in taste is booksy. Well dog my cats, just goes to how ya, whodthunkit, hard tellin', not knowin', eh? ħumanUser talk:Human 02:27, 12 June 2008 (EDT)