Difference between revisions of "User talk:Caius"

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New section: Community Standards)
Line 63: Line 63:
 
==Image:LochShiel04.png==
 
==Image:LochShiel04.png==
 
Ames, do you have a Flickr account?
 
Ames, do you have a Flickr account?
 +
 +
== Community Standards ==
 +
 +
I put some suggestions on [[RationalWiki talk:Community Standards]] to help progress the conversation in a new direction.  I view it as a community wide discussion, not arbitration for a specific case.  Please comment there. [[User:Sterile|Sterile]]<sup>[[User talk:Sterile|xx]]</sup> 17:49, 25 March 2008 (EDT)

Revision as of 21:49, 25 March 2008

Speak to Me! (haha, buttsecks?)

BrainMop.png As a confirmed mustard jar for taking on this job as a Sysop on RationalWiki: I pledge to only block users if they ask for it, or insert unfunny vandalism.
I furthermore pledge that if I indulge in secret private conversations about you, we will make a formal report to the mob. Is that all?
If you impugn my motives without warrant, or challenge my "AUTHORITY", er, there is nothing I can or will do.


Teh Cabal
(Oh noes! Halp!)


TIME!

Are you ready? TmtamesP 23:24, 13 March 2008 (EDT)

No. --Gulik 00:00, 14 March 2008 (EDT)
I am. It's on! humanUser talk:Human 01:26, 14 March 2008 (EDT)
Hello all. So I was actually flying. See, I was supposed to have landed in City 1 by now, but wound up in City 2. Why, you ask? Two words: fuck Airtran. Some more words: your two-hour delays are bad, and made about 100 people today miss their connections. Human, would you be my second again, even though Bohdan isn't man enough to debate you?-αmεσ (soldier) 01:37, 14 March 2008 (EDT)
Sure, no problem. Although all it usually takes to derail teh nadhoB is a simple non sequitur, followed by an ad hoc jab with an ad hominem truth. Hope you make it home (or wherever your destination is). humanUser talk:Human 01:43, 14 March 2008 (EDT)

City #2 is where fambly lives, so life has a pretty good silver lining :-) but thanks for your concern! I'd be concerned for Airtran. Heads're gonna roll.-αmεσ (soldier) 01:47, 14 March 2008 (EDT)

ha ha!

Even you believe you're just like what you claim cp is sometimes. TmtamesP 11:59, 14 March 2008 (EDT)

I hadn't paid attention to the according to page in a while, but I do think it's vitally important that we mean what we say, yeah. Which is one reason I like having you around... you keep us honest in our internal dealings, if sometimes you go too far.-αmεσ (soldier) 12:03, 14 March 2008 (EDT)
I have been called a sock of tmtoulouse, a sock of you, a sock of aschlafly, but never a sock of tk. TmtamesP 12:05, 14 March 2008 (EDT)

Thanks

But we could still do with some more help. I'm beginning to get tired and cranky with the discussion. MarcusCicero 13:38, 14 March 2008 (EDT)

debates

Ames, I have secured a wiki for non-stop debating. Please tell me what time you are available to debate. Until then, TmtamesP 19:49, 15 March 2008 (EDT)

You are, however, not permitted to wear clogs or play with Lego while on the site. Just remember that. --מְתֻרְגְּמָן שְׁלֹום
What? I have to play with Lego when I edit wikis! TmtamesP 19:59, 15 March 2008 (EDT)
Remember NDPOV, Bohdan. --מְתֻרְגְּמָן שְׁלֹום
You're right. I will gladly give it up for such a noble cause. TmtamesP 20:02, 15 March 2008 (EDT)
I think everyone should be playing with Lego all the time. The more, the better! --AKjeldsenGodspeed! 20:05, 15 March 2008 (EDT)
That figures... TmtamesP 20:06, 15 March 2008 (EDT)
Well, we all have to do ours for the balance of trade. --AKjeldsenGodspeed! 20:31, 15 March 2008 (EDT)
AKjeldsen, please come join the fun at rwww. We need a resident Dane. TmtamesP 20:38, 15 March 2008 (EDT)
As long as he does not try to infiltrate the awesoem articles with a Danish Point Of View! Keep him under close supervision! humanUser talk:Human 21:51, 15 March 2008 (EDT)

Its tuesday, debate night. TmtamesP 12:54, 18 March 2008 (EDT)

I'll debate if you go over to the other place & call Ed Poor out on his craziness.-αmεσ (soldier) 12:56, 18 March 2008 (EDT)
Really? Now I must earn debates? Are you talking about the liberal code words page? TmtamesP 13:01, 18 March 2008 (EDT)
Just general, "articles sourced to blog posts" pages.-αmεσ (soldier) 13:03, 18 March 2008 (EDT)
Whoa. You did. I guess we have to debate now!-αmεσ (soldier) 13:35, 18 March 2008 (EDT)
Yes, you owe me a debate. Due to the climate of this site, I suggest we have our debate on Rwww. Not only are there bytes upon bytes to go around, I can block you if I start to feel I am losing. Its really win-win. TmtamesP 17:37, 18 March 2008 (EDT)

Well? Where are you? Don't make me write a liberal honesty article... TmtamesP 22:23, 18 March 2008 (EDT)

apologies but I'm currently occupied with throwing up. Some bad Indian food. Pray for mojo. Sysop rights to the first person to place that quote.αmεσ (soldier) 00:03, 19 March 2008 (EDT)

As much as it pains me to say this, I don't believe you. You're probably out with Spitz right now... TmtamesP 00:09, 19 March 2008 (EDT)
Bohdan, did you just pass up the op for sysopness?????? Pinto's5150 Talk 00:12, 19 March 2008 (EDT)
B17, you might want to go put a security fence around your beloved RWWW. Teh wandals edit it more than anyone else; teh logo, she iz gonn, captin. humanUser talk:Human 00:20, 19 March 2008 (EDT)
And where, may I ask, were you whilst the wiki was being vandalized? I made you a sysop for a reason. TmtamesP 00:53, 19 March 2008 (EDT)
Bohdan dearest, I was telling the truth! And I just sat up for the first time in 12 hours or so. It's really exciting. I had to share it.-αmεσ (soldier) 16:33, 19 March 2008 (EDT)
Ames, old sport, I think I speak for the entire wiki when I say "thank you for sharing". Get well soon. TmtamesP 17:53, 19 March 2008 (EDT)

Susan

They think I drove away Susan. Thats why their pissed. MarcusCicero 07:01, 25 March 2008 (EDT)

me

ames, can you block me for 5 minutes, i dont want myself getting too angry here --RyanB 11:00, 25 March 2008 (EDT)

Image:LochShiel04.png

Ames, do you have a Flickr account?

Community Standards

I put some suggestions on RationalWiki talk:Community Standards to help progress the conversation in a new direction. I view it as a community wide discussion, not arbitration for a specific case. Please comment there. Sterilexx 17:49, 25 March 2008 (EDT)